Sponsor Advertisement
Trump's Border Policy Yields Zero May Releases, Sharp Drop in Crossings

Trump's Border Policy Yields Zero May Releases, Sharp Drop in Crossings

In May 2025, for the first time in over a year, no illegal immigrants were released into the U.S. by Border Patrol, a significant contrast to the 62,000 releases in May 2024 under Biden's administration.

In a stark turnaround from the previous year, the U.S. Border Patrol did not release any illegal immigrants into the country during May 2025, a move that marks a 93 percent drop from May 2024's figures under the Biden administration. The data indicates a significant policy shift and underscores the effectiveness of the border enforcement strategies implemented by President Donald Trump's administration.

In May 2024, federal authorities released approximately 62,000 individuals after encounters at the southern border. Fast forward to May 2025, and that number plummeted to zero despite the apprehension of 8,725 attempting to cross. This decline has been attributed to the operational support and policy changes under the current administration.

Acting Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Commissioner Pete Flores commented on the marked improvement, stating, “Under the leadership of this administration, CBP has received historic support resulting in another 93% decrease in illegal crossings along the southwest border this month when compared with last year,” as reported by the New York Post.

The commendations extended to social media, where House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) celebrated the achievement with a tweet: “PROMISES MADE, PROMISES KEPT. Another CLEAR example of strong, America First Leadership by @POTUS.” Texas Governor Greg Abbott also highlighted the stark contrasts in border control results between Trump and Biden, lauding Trump's approach as a demonstration of "real leadership."

The change in numbers reflects a reversal from the Biden administration's policies, which often saw illegal immigrants released and subsequently finding employment, sometimes to repay smuggling debts, thereby encouraging further immigration, according to Breitbart News. In contrast, the Trump administration has adopted a detention-focused approach upon apprehension, disrupting smuggling networks and acting as a deterrent to further crossings.

Former Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Director Tom Homan criticized the prior administration's release policy in an April interview with Breitbart, questioning the rationale behind choosing expensive hotel accommodations over more economical ICE detention facilities, and suggesting that the previous policy had the intentional effect of allowing immigrants to stay in the U.S. for extended periods.

The data from May is consistent with a downward trend in illegal crossings and releases since Trump's inauguration. Chief Michael W. Banks, on Twitter, highlighted the "continued historic lows with a 93% drop in illegal crossings last month," attributing this to increased border patrol and a strong enforcement posture that prevents a "flood" of illegal crossings and bolsters capabilities to combat criminal networks.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The recent news of zero illegal immigrant releases in May 2025 raises important questions from a progressive standpoint. While border security is unquestionably important, the methods and consequences of achieving it must be scrutinized for their impact on human rights and the underlying systemic issues.

A zero-tolerance policy may deter illegal crossings, but it also has a significant humanitarian cost. Detention without release can lead to overcrowded facilities and prolonged detainment without due process, potentially infringing on human rights. Rather than a strict detention policy, there should be a focus on comprehensive immigration reform that provides clear, compassionate pathways for asylum seekers and addresses the root causes of migration, such as violence and economic instability in home countries.

The progressive view advocates for a balanced approach that ensures border security while upholding America's tradition as a beacon of hope for the oppressed. It is crucial to consider the long-term consequences of aggressive border policies, including their impact on America's image as a leader in human rights, as well as the potential for these policies to sow fear and distrust among immigrant communities.

Conservative View

The Trump administration's policy of zero releases at the border in May 2025 stands as a testament to the conservative principles of law and order and the protection of national sovereignty. A country cannot claim to be secure if it cannot control its borders. This administration has made it clear that the rule of law is paramount, and the results speak for themselves.

By putting an end to the 'catch and release' policy that allowed illegal immigrants to enter the U.S. interior, the administration has demonstrated its commitment to the principles of individual liberty and limited government. This approach places the responsibility squarely on individuals to follow the legal processes for entry. Moreover, the economic efficiency of using ICE detention facilities over expensive hotel stays is a logical decision that respects taxpayer dollars.

It is a matter of national security and economic prudence to ensure that those entering the country do so legally, without burdening the system. The sharp decline in illegal border crossings is a direct consequence of policies that prioritize America's interests first, discourage illegal immigration, and protect the integrity of our immigration system. The conservative viewpoint underscores the importance of a government that enforces its laws while fostering a climate where legal immigration is respected and encouraged.

Common Ground

Despite differing viewpoints on border security and immigration, there is common ground to be found in the shared objective of a safe, orderly, and humane immigration system. Both conservatives and progressives can agree on the importance of protecting national borders and ensuring that immigration occurs legally and transparently.

There is potential for bipartisan support for policies that secure the border and simultaneously uphold humanitarian values, such as investing in technology and infrastructure that streamline border processing and improve conditions for those detained. Additionally, both sides can work together to address the root causes of illegal immigration, such as by providing aid and support for the economic development of countries that are major sources of migrants.

By focusing on solutions that respect the rule of law and human dignity, there is an opportunity to forge a comprehensive immigration strategy that can garner widespread support and effectively manage the challenges at the border.