Sponsor Advertisement
Investigation Targets Biden's Pardon Decisions and Mental Competency
AI illustration. Particular LLC

Investigation Targets Biden's Pardon Decisions and Mental Competency

The Trump administration has initiated a probe into former President Joe Biden's mental competency and his use of an autopen for clemency decisions, including a pardon for his son, Hunter Biden.

The Trump administration has launched an investigation examining former President Joe Biden's mental competency during his final presidential acts, with a particular focus on his use of an autopen device to sign clemency documents. Ed Martin, Trump's pardon attorney, revealed that the Justice Department has been tasked with scrutinizing the clemency decisions granted by Biden as his presidency concluded.

Interest in Biden's mental fitness has escalated following the publication of "Original Sin" by journalists Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson, which claims that Biden's cognitive deterioration was managed by a group of family members and close aides, dubbed a "politburo." These revelations have caused a divide within the Democratic Party, with some members distancing themselves from Biden while others, like former President Bill Clinton, continue to support him. Clinton, in a recent CBS interview, expressed his belief that Biden was in "good shape" during his presidency.

The investigation is unprecedented and focuses on determining whether Biden was competent when granting clemency, especially concerning the December pardon of his son Hunter Biden, who was convicted on federal charges. The use of an autopen—a mechanical device that has been employed by presidents and lawmakers for decades to reproduce signatures on official documents—is at the center of this inquiry.

Hunter Biden was pardoned following his conviction on three felonies related to illegal gun possession. Accusations have also surfaced that both Hunter Biden and former First Lady Jill Biden exerted undue influence over the president in his final weeks in office. Critics, including Trump and his supporters, argue that Biden's reliance on the autopen device either delegitimized his presidential actions or indicated a lack of awareness concerning these decisions.

Trump declared Biden's last-minute pardons "void, vacant and of no further force or effect,"

The finer details of Biden's use of autopen technology for pardons are not fully disclosed. Trump, in March, declared Biden's last-minute pardons "void, vacant and of no further force or effect," also warning that House committee members investigating the Jan. 6 riots could be prosecuted. The Justice Department's probe will also look into pre-emptive pardons Biden issued to family members and clemency decisions that commuted 37 federal death penalty sentences to life imprisonment.

On January 20, prior to transferring power to Trump, Biden pardoned five family members, stating his intention to "protect them from future politically motivated investigations." These pardons included Biden's siblings James Biden, Frank Biden, and Valerie Biden Owens, as well as their spouses, John Owens and Sara Biden. The investigation, however, has not specified which family member pardons will be scrutinized, nor has it clarified who authorized the probe. Both the White House and the Department of Justice have been contacted for official statements regarding the matter.

Presidential pardon power, granted by the Constitution, allows for pardons for federal criminal convictions and commutations to modify sentences—a power exercised throughout American history. Trump himself granted clemency to nearly 1,600 supporters on January 20, 2021. Martin, during a May 13 press conference, stated that using the autopen for pardon power is not necessarily problematic but maintained that Biden's pardons deserved examination.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The investigation into former President Biden's mental competency and clemency decisions, while necessary for transparency, also touches upon deeper systemic issues that concern progressives. The focus on social justice and equity calls for a careful examination of the power dynamics at play, particularly when it comes to the influence of close aides and family members in the decision-making process.

The use of an autopen, in itself, is not the crux of the issue. Instead, it is the potential exploitation of a leader's diminished cognitive abilities that should be of utmost concern. This situation underscores the need for robust systems to protect the integrity of executive decisions and the well-being of the leader in question. It is a reminder that our institutions must be resilient and fair, not easily swayed by personal interests or familial ties.

Additionally, the preemptive pardons suggest a need to reevaluate the safeguards against the politicization of legal proceedings. The progressive vision for a fair and equitable society demands that justice is not a tool used for political retribution or protection. The government and community must work together to ensure that all individuals, regardless of their status or connections, are held to the same legal standards.

Conservative View

The recent investigation into former President Joe Biden's use of an autopen for clemency decisions raises important questions about the integrity of executive power and accountability. From a conservative perspective, the essence of this issue lies in safeguarding the principles of individual liberty and limited government. If an executive, due to mental incompetency, delegates the solemn responsibility of clemency to a mechanical device without proper oversight, it undermines the constitutionally granted authority and potentially allows for unchecked power.

Moreover, the pardons in question—especially those involving Biden's family members—reflect a concerning trend of nepotism and lack of transparency. The conservative principle of personal responsibility is starkly at odds with the notion of preemptive pardons meant to shield from politically motivated investigations. It raises the specter of elite privilege and the circumvention of legal processes that are meant to apply equally to all citizens.

The economic efficiency argument also comes into play here. If government officials are not held to the highest standard of competency and accountability, it leads to a waste of taxpayer-funded resources, as investigations like the current one become necessary to ensure the integrity of governance. It is paramount that each presidential act, particularly those with lasting implications, be executed with full awareness and intent, not through automated processes that could be manipulated.

Common Ground

In the midst of the investigation into former President Biden's final acts and mental competency, a common ground can be found in the universal call for transparency and integrity in leadership. Both conservative and progressive viewpoints agree that the authority to grant clemency is a profound responsibility that must be exercised with the utmost care and sound judgment.

There is also bipartisan acknowledgment that the rule of law is paramount and that any form of nepotism or abuse of power should be scrutinized regardless of political affiliation. The sanctity of the legal process and the equitable application of justice are principles that transcend ideological differences.

Ultimately, ensuring that our leaders are capable and that their decisions are made with clarity and purpose is a shared goal. It is in the nation's best interest to have robust mechanisms in place to prevent the misuse of power and to uphold the Constitution. Both sides can agree that protecting the integrity of the presidency is crucial for maintaining public trust and the proper functioning of our democracy.