STATUS: Currently our image feed is down. We are working on it and it should be back within 48 hours. ----- Launched to challenge overwhelming bias — Balanced Right — your new home for clear, contextual news. - Latest Headlines: Stephen Miller Touted for National Security Adviser Role | Legal Group Sues Chief Justice Over Supreme Court Ethics Inquiries | Ex-Bush Official Alleges Secretive $21T Government Spend on Elite Havens | Virginia Governor Youngkin Embroiled in GOP Scandal Amid AllegationsSTATUS: Currently our image feed is down. We are working on it and it should be back within 48 hours. ----- Launched to challenge overwhelming bias — Balanced Right — your new home for clear, contextual news. - Latest Headlines: Stephen Miller Touted for National Security Adviser Role | Legal Group Sues Chief Justice Over Supreme Court Ethics Inquiries | Ex-Bush Official Alleges Secretive $21T Government Spend on Elite Havens | Virginia Governor Youngkin Embroiled in GOP Scandal Amid Allegations
Ex-Bush Official Alleges Secretive $21T Government Spend on Elite Havens

Ex-Bush Official Alleges Secretive $21T Government Spend on Elite Havens

Catherine Austin Fitts, former HUD assistant secretary, accuses the U.S. government of funneling $21 trillion into a clandestine network of underground facilities for the elite, based on a 2017 financial report.

Catherine Austin Fitts, a former assistant secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) under President George H. W. Bush, has made a startling assertion that trillions of dollars have been secretly allocated to construct an underground network for the world's power players. In an interview with Tucker Carlson, Fitts detailed her team's research, which points to the existence of approximately 170 underground bases and cities, some even beneath the ocean, funded by unaccounted federal money.

The origins of this claim can be traced back to a 2017 report by Mark Skidmore, an economist at Michigan State University. Skidmore's analysis uncovered $21 trillion in unsupported adjustments within the Department of Defense and HUD over a 17-year span from 1998 to 2015. Fitts, now an investment banker, believes these discrepancies are indicative of funds diverted to construct these hidden facilities.

Skidmore's investigation began when Fitts highlighted an alarming figure: $6.5 trillion in unsupported Army spending for the fiscal year 2015 alone. Considering the Army's budget was set at $122 billion, the report underscored that the adjustments were over 54 times the authorized spending by Congress.

Fitts speculates that these networks of subterranean strongholds could serve as sanctuaries for the elite during cataclysmic events. Beyond acting as mere bunkers, she suggests they might harbor government "secret projects" and potentially a "secret space program." She also posited the use of advanced energy sources to power these facilities, beyond the realm of conventional electricity.

Adding to the intrigue, Tucker Carlson recounted a conversation with a contractor who claimed to have worked on a base beneath Washington, D.C. This contractor described a seemingly ordinary transformer box on Constitution Avenue as a secret egress point from the White House.

These allegations gain further momentum against the backdrop of a burgeoning market for luxury doomsday bunkers among the affluent. A company named SAFE has recently launched a $300 million underground facility called "Aerie," which boasts a $20 million membership fee. Located near Washington, D.C., this development could be the first in a series of high-tech bunkers across the United States.

While some may dismiss Fitts' claims as conspiratorial musings, they underscore a broader issue of government transparency and elite preparedness for global emergencies. The public's awareness of these allegations, and the potential misuse of taxpayer dollars, may lead to increased scrutiny and demand for accountability in governmental spending and secret undertakings.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

From a progressive standpoint, the concerns raised by Catherine Austin Fitts resonate with the call for economic justice and equitable treatment of all citizens. The idea that billions, if not trillions, of dollars have potentially been funneled into projects for the societal elite goes against progressive values of transparency, fairness, and public welfare.

Progressives are likely to advocate for immediate disclosure and transparency regarding the allocation of government funds. The alleged spending on secretive infrastructures for the elite exacerbates the already significant wealth and opportunity gaps in our society. This situation could be seen as emblematic of systemic inequality, where resources that could benefit the public are instead reserved for a privileged minority.

Moreover, if advanced energy technologies exist, progressives would argue that such innovations should be leveraged for the greater good, potentially aiding in the fight against climate change and the transition to renewable energy sources.

Conservative View

The allegations by Catherine Austin Fitts, if proven true, could validate long-held conservative concerns about the misuse of government funds and the lack of fiscal accountability in federal agencies. It underscores the need for a more transparent government that prioritizes the interests of all citizens, not just the privileged few.

The conservative perspective emphasizes the importance of limited government and responsible financial stewardship. The notion that $21 trillion—more than the current national debt—could have been misappropriated into building underground enclaves for the elite is appalling. Conservatives argue for a full investigation into these claims, as they betray the trust of the American taxpayer and potentially infringe upon the constitutional mandate for a government that is accountable to its people.

Furthermore, conservatives may view these alleged secret projects as symptomatic of a government that has overreached and operated beyond its intended constraints. The existence of a secret space program or advanced energy technologies, if true, should be brought into the public sphere and subjected to the scrutiny of elected representatives and the citizens they serve.

Common Ground

Both conservatives and progressives should be able to find common ground in demanding accountability and transparency from the government. The potential misuse of taxpayer money is a bipartisan issue that undermines the trust in public institutions and the democratic process.

There should be unanimous support for a thorough investigation into these claims, ensuring that public funds are used for the benefit of all citizens and not squandered on clandestine projects. Additionally, both sides can likely agree that if new energy technologies exist, they should be disclosed and potentially applied to address broader societal challenges, such as energy sustainability and environmental protection.