Sponsor Advertisement
Study Suggests Colbert's Show Favors Liberal Guests

Study Suggests Colbert's Show Favors Liberal Guests

Analysis by NewsBusters highlights a significant imbalance in political guests on Stephen Colbert's "The Late Show," suggesting a liberal bias.

A study conducted by media watchdog NewsBusters has brought to light an apparent political bias in Stephen Colbert's "The Late Show." The analysis, which tracked guest appearances since 2022, indicates a stark imbalance in political representation, with a preponderance of liberal guests and a scarcity of conservative voices, potentially turning the show into a form of "group therapy" for liberals.

Since 2022, Colbert has invited 176 left-leaning guests, contrasted with only one Republican, as reported by NewsBusters. The trend persisted into 2025, with 43 liberal guests in the first half of the year and no conservative figures. Curtis Houck, managing editor of NewsBusters, labeled the program as "late-night group therapy for liberals," citing a growing disinterest among viewers for partisan content masquerading as comedy.

High-profile Democrats like Chuck Schumer, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, and Cory Booker have all graced Colbert's stage. Additionally, New York socialists Zohran Mamdani and Brad Lander, alongside liberal media personalities such as MSNBC's Chris Hayes, HBO's John Oliver, and New York Times columnist Ezra Klein have made appearances, as mentioned by the New York Post.

The sole Republican guest since 2022, former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY), had a contentious interview with Colbert in December 2023. Cheney's persistent criticism of former President Donald Trump and her campaigning with Kamala Harris during the 2024 election has led many to question her representation of conservative values.

January 2025 saw Colbert interview former Republican congressman Adam Kinzinger, who, despite being excluded from NewsBusters' conservative count due to his anti-Trump stance and support for Harris, adds to the political diversity on the show.

Amidst the controversy, CBS announced the cancellation of "The Late Show" in May 2026, officially attributing the decision to financial constraints. The show reportedly suffered over $100 million in annual losses, with audience numbers dwindling. The timing of the cancellation, however, has raised eyebrows, occurring just after Colbert criticized CBS's parent company Paramount Global for a $16 million settlement with Trump—facilitating a lucrative merger cleared by the Trump-led Federal Communications Commission.

Houck attributes the show's decline to its partisan tone and alienation of half the American populace. He also notes the broader trend of cable TV subscriber loss contributing to the show's financial woes.

The imbalance extends beyond Colbert's program, as NewsBusters recorded 511 liberal guests versus 14 conservatives across all late-night shows since 2022. Despite the criticisms, Colbert has yet to respond to media inquiries and will continue broadcasting until spring 2026. Other hosts, including Jimmy Kimmel, Seth Meyers, and Jimmy Fallon, have contracts extending through 2028.

In a striking turn, Trump's former chief strategist, Steve Bannon, has called for a federal investigation into late-night TV producers, accusing them of making illegal in-kind contributions to Democrats. Bannon suggested the financial losses related to Colbert's show could total up to $500 million.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The NewsBusters report regarding Stephen Colbert's "The Late Show" highlights a need for introspection within the media landscape about the role of late-night television. From a progressive standpoint, the importance of advocating for social justice, equity, and a more inclusive society is paramount. However, it is also crucial to recognize that a failure to include diverse political perspectives can inadvertently perpetuate systemic biases, hindering the very progress sought.

While the predominance of liberal guests on "The Late Show" may provide a sanctuary for those who share those views, it is essential to question whether this also silences or marginalizes conservative perspectives. As progressives, the goal should be to champion a media environment that encourages constructive dialogue and challenges systemic issues through robust debate. The lack of conservative voices potentially deprives the audience of comprehensive discussions that could lead to collective solutions.

In addressing environmental issues, social equity, and collective well-being, it is vital to engage with all sides. This engagement creates an opportunity to influence and educate, potentially leading to broader support for progressive policies. A more balanced representation of political ideologies on shows like Colbert's could foster a greater understanding and bridge the divide, ultimately contributing to a more informed and harmonious society.

Conservative View

The NewsBusters study on Stephen Colbert's "The Late Show" underscores a trend that many conservatives find concerning: the transformation of late-night comedy into a partisan echo chamber. This alleged bias not only skews public discourse but also undermines the principles of a free and diverse media landscape, which conservatives uphold. The notion of individual liberty extends to the media, where a plurality of views should be represented to foster an informed electorate.

Late-night television, traditionally an entertainment medium, has seemingly adopted a political agenda that leans heavily to the left, excluding conservative voices in what could be perceived as a disregard for fair representation. This lack of balance can be seen as an affront to the free market of ideas, where all perspectives should compete on an equal footing. Colbert's show, by predominantly hosting liberal guests, may have contributed to a one-sided narrative, alienating conservative viewers and potentially leading to the show's decline in ratings and financial losses.

Moreover, Colbert's pointed criticisms of former President Trump and the Republican Party resonate with a selective audience, potentially at the expense of broader appeal and economic efficiency. The conservative viewpoint champions media outlets that respect diverse ideologies and do not rely on government regulation, but rather the market to dictate their success. As viewership declines, market forces should naturally correct any imbalances, as seen with the cancellation of "The Late Show."

Common Ground

The recent study by NewsBusters regarding the political leanings of Stephen Colbert's "The Late Show" guests opens a conversation that transcends partisan lines. It highlights the universal value of diverse representation in media—a principle that both conservatives and progressives can agree upon.

Both sides may acknowledge the importance of a media that reflects a wide range of ideologies, facilitating a more comprehensive public discourse. There is a shared belief in the power of dialogue to enlighten and inform, which can only be achieved through balanced representation. Furthermore, there is likely a consensus that the media's role is not to serve as an echo chamber, but as a forum for varied voices and ideas.

In the spirit of collaboration, both conservatives and progressives might explore ways to advocate for more equitable guest line-ups on such shows. Encouraging media producers to invite a broader spectrum of political thought can lead to more dynamic conversations, enriching the national dialogue and fostering a more informed populace.