Sponsor Advertisement
Yates Allegedly Ordered FBI to Drop Clinton Probe, Email Suggests

Yates Allegedly Ordered FBI to Drop Clinton Probe, Email Suggests

An email reportedly shows Sally Yates instructed the FBI to stop investigating the Clinton Foundation during the 2016 election, according to John Solomon.

A recent revelation has brought to light an email that potentially implicates former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates in halting an FBI criminal investigation into the Clinton Foundation. The investigation was active in 2016, delving into whether Hillary Clinton, during her tenure as Secretary of State, engaged in a pay-to-play scheme with foreign nationals and donors seeking influence over U.S. policy.

Investigative journalist John Solomon, known for his work on politically sensitive topics, reported on the email, stating it was obtained by former FBI Director Kash Patel. The investigation in question spanned multiple locations, including New York, Washington, D.C., and Little Rock, and was focused on the Clinton Foundation's fundraising activities and their potential link to political favors.

The narrative detailed by Solomon suggests that the probe faced significant resistance from within the FBI, particularly from then-Deputy Director Andrew McCabe. McCabe, critics point out, may have had a conflict of interest as his wife received campaign donations from a Clinton ally while he was involved in decisions related to the investigation.

Further complicating the situation was the lack of support from U.S. Attorney offices, with three out of four offices declining to cooperate with the FBI on subpoenas and evidence collection, leaving the investigators strapped for resources.

The most striking claim comes from the reported contents of the email from Yates, which explicitly directed the FBI to "shut it down," terminating the investigation before the 2016 presidential election. This directive, as Solomon argues, effectively granted the Clintons immunity while the investigation was still active across several FBI offices.

The abrupt end to the investigation has led several prosecutors to express their readiness to cooperate with Congressional and Trump-aligned investigators, as reported by The Gateway Pundit. Patel is also said to hold additional emails from other Obama-era officials that could shed more light on the decision to close the investigation.

The Clinton Foundation has been embroiled in controversy for years, particularly concerning Clinton's use of a private email server for official business as Secretary of State. This server is suspected of facilitating preferential treatment for foundation donors. Judge Royce Lamberth has previously condemned Clinton's handling of private emails as a severe breach of government transparency.

Solomon frames these events as part of a broader pattern of political bias, accusing the FBI and Department of Justice of pursuing baseless allegations against Republicans while protecting high-profile Democrats from scrutiny. The investigation's cessation in August 2021, under the Biden Justice Department, marked an unexpected halt to FBI activities related to the case.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The allegations that former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates instructed the FBI to stop investigating the Clinton Foundation during a critical election period are deeply concerning from a progressive standpoint. They speak to systemic issues of power imbalance and the need for justice that serves the public interest, not just the interests of the elite.

Progressives believe in the importance of holding all individuals, regardless of status, to the same legal standards. The potential obstruction of an investigation into a major political figure suggests a disregard for the principles of transparency and accountability that are vital to a healthy democracy. If true, Yates' actions would represent a failure to respect the rule of law, a cornerstone of social justice.

The idea that high-ranking officials can influence investigations to protect allies undermines faith in our institutions and erodes the trust that is essential for collective well-being. It is imperative that government agencies operate independently of political influence to maintain integrity and public confidence.

The broader implications of such actions, if confirmed, would necessitate a thorough examination of our justice system to identify and correct systemic flaws. This includes ensuring that investigations are free from political bias and that all individuals are subject to equitable scrutiny.

Conservative View

The recent revelation surrounding Sally Yates' email directing the FBI to cease its investigation into the Clinton Foundation represents a troubling example of government overreach and a lack of accountability. It is essential to underscore the fundamental conservative principle of equal justice under the law, which seems to have been compromised in this instance.

The Clinton Foundation investigation's abrupt halt reinforces concerns about the impartiality of federal agencies and the potential for political interference in law enforcement matters. The allegations of pay-to-play practices by a former Secretary of State raise serious questions about corruption and the use of public office for personal gain, issues that should be of paramount concern to all who value transparency and ethical governance.

The notion that significant investigations can be obstructed due to political expediency undermines public trust in our institutions. It is incumbent upon those in positions of power to adhere to the rule of law and ensure that justice is administered without bias. Furthermore, the apparent reluctance of the U.S. Attorney offices to support the probe illustrates a systemic problem with accountability in our justice system.

If the content of the email as reported is accurate, it suggests a deliberate effort to shield politically connected individuals from scrutiny, which is antithetical to the conservative values of fair play and equal treatment. This incident underscores the need for a more limited and accountable government, where individual liberties are not trampled by the machinations of the powerful.

Common Ground

Despite differing political ideologies, both conservatives and progressives can agree that the rule of law and the integrity of our justice system are foundational to a functioning democracy. If Sally Yates did indeed instruct the FBI to halt the Clinton Foundation investigation, it presents an opportunity for bipartisan consensus on the need for transparency and accountability within government agencies.

Both sides can unite in the pursuit of ethical governance and the prevention of undue political influence over law enforcement. It's a shared value that justice should be impartial and independent, serving the public interest rather than partisan agendas.

The potential willingness of prosecutors to cooperate with investigators offers a chance to reaffirm a commitment to thorough and unbiased inquiry. Collaboration in seeking the truth can pave the way for reforms aimed at bolstering the integrity of our institutions, ensuring that all citizens, regardless of political affiliation or status, are treated equally before the law.