Sponsor Advertisement
Texas AG Probes Over 100 Suspected Noncitizen Voters

Texas AG Probes Over 100 Suspected Noncitizen Voters

Texas AG Ken Paxton initiates an investigation into suspected illegal voting by over 100 noncitizens in recent elections, following Trump-era database access.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced an extensive investigation into the voting activities of more than 100 individuals suspected of casting ballots as noncitizens during the 2020 and 2022 election cycles. The inquiry, which alleges these individuals participated in over 200 instances of voting across multiple counties, has plunged the state into a contentious debate over election integrity.

On Tuesday, Paxton expressed his firm stance: “Illegal aliens and foreign nationals must not be allowed to influence Texas elections by casting illegal ballots with impunity. I will not allow it to continue.” This investigation is a direct result of President Donald Trump's executive order that facilitated state access to the SAVE (Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements) database, managed by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).

While Harris County has been the focus of most identified suspicious activities, the investigation has also extended to Guadalupe, Cameron, and Eastland counties. The Texas Secretary of State's office has played a crucial role in this process, providing data which has enabled the cross-checking of voter registrations against citizenship records to identify potential illegal voting.

This isn't the first time Texas has taken measures to safeguard its elections. Recently, 33 individuals were referred to Paxton's office for allegedly voting illegally in the November 2024 election, flagged using the SAVE system. Paxton has been vocal about the importance of this tool, stating, “If you’re a noncitizen who illegally cast a ballot, you will face the full force of the law.”

Despite these allegations, election officials and independent studies have consistently found that noncitizen voting in the United States is a rare occurrence. Widespread voter fraud of this nature is not considered a significant problem by most experts. However, Paxton and other Republican leaders argue that the integrity of elections is compromised even by a small number of illegal votes, necessitating strict enforcement of election laws to ensure fairness.

The investigation coincides with a politically charged period, as Paxton is campaigning to challenge U.S. Senator John Cornyn in the 2026 Republican primary. This move has raised questions about the timing and motives behind the probe. It also comes ahead of a vote on a Texas constitutional amendment that seeks to reaffirm the citizen-only voting requirement, a standard that is already in place under current laws.

Across the nation, states like New Hampshire, Louisiana, and Wyoming have passed laws mandating documentary proof of citizenship to vote. Texas lawmakers attempted to pass similar legislation, but it did not progress during the legislative session.

Paxton's office remains committed to prosecuting every confirmed case of illegal voting, emphasizing that these investigations are part of a broader statewide effort to protect election integrity. The accessibility of the SAVE system is seen as a crucial component in this ongoing battle to ensure only eligible voters participate in Texas elections.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

While ensuring the integrity of our elections is a shared goal, the investigation launched by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton raises concerns about the potential for disenfranchisement and the actual impact of noncitizen voting. The push to investigate over 100 suspected noncitizen voters must be balanced with the knowledge that multiple studies and audits have shown that voter fraud is exceedingly rare in the United States.

The progressive perspective emphasizes the importance of promoting participation in our democracy, and the measures taken should not create barriers that could intimidate eligible voters or suppress turnout. The use of the SAVE database, while potentially useful for identifying ineligible voters, must be implemented with extreme caution to avoid errors that could lead to eligible voters being wrongly purged from the rolls.

Moreover, the timing of Paxton's investigation, amidst his own political campaign, warrants scrutiny. It's crucial to ensure that such probes are not politically motivated or used as tools for voter suppression under the guise of preventing fraud. Progressives advocate for systemic solutions that expand voting access and rights, while still maintaining secure elections.

The proposed constitutional amendment and similar legislation in other states, which seek to require proof of citizenship to vote, could disproportionately affect marginalized communities, including the poor and people of color, who may face obstacles in obtaining the necessary documentation.

Conservative View

The recent actions taken by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton are a commendable step toward preserving the sanctity of the electoral process. The essence of a representative democracy hinges on the principle that only those who are legally entitled to vote—citizens—can determine the direction of our government. It's not about the number of illegal votes cast; it's the principle that matters. Every unlawful vote dilutes the power of legitimate voters, undermining the democratic process.

The Trump administration's executive order that granted states access to the SAVE database is a prime example of the government effectively using its resources to empower states to enforce the law. This access is pivotal for Texas to uphold the integrity of its elections, and Paxton is right to utilize it fully. It's not about xenophobia or discrimination; it's about adherence to the rule of law.

Critics may argue that instances of noncitizen voting are minimal and do not influence election outcomes. However, the conservative viewpoint emphasizes that law and order are paramount, and even a single case of illegal voting is one too many. It's about setting a precedent that illegal actions have consequences, and safeguarding our elections is a non-negotiable aspect of American sovereignty.

Moreover, the proposed Texas constitutional amendment to explicitly state that only U.S. citizens may vote serves to reinforce this principle. While some may see it as redundant, it is a symbolic gesture that reinforces the value Texans place on their electoral system's legitimacy.

Common Ground

Despite differing perspectives on the investigation initiated by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, there's potential common ground to be found in the shared objective of ensuring fair and secure elections. Both conservative and progressive viewpoints can agree that the integrity of the electoral process is vital and that every eligible citizen should have the opportunity to cast their vote without fraud or suppression.

Finding a middle path involves creating and implementing measures that prevent illegal voting while also making sure that every eligible voter can easily exercise their right to vote. This could include improving the accuracy of voter rolls, increasing transparency in the election process, and investing in better voter education.

Additionally, both sides might support the use of technology to streamline voter verification processes, as long as it is done with respect for privacy and inclusivity. By focusing on these shared goals, there is a chance for bipartisan collaboration that upholds the integrity of elections while fostering an inclusive democracy.