Sponsor Advertisement
St. Paul Council VP Hwa Jeong Kim Under Fire for Anti-ICE Video

St. Paul Council VP Hwa Jeong Kim Under Fire for Anti-ICE Video

St. Paul City Council Vice President Hwa Jeong Kim faces backlash for a video instructing residents on aiding those avoiding ICE. Critics condemn her actions as obstructive to federal law, while supporters view it as community protection.

St. Paul City Council Vice President Hwa Jeong Kim has sparked a wave of criticism following her recent Instagram video post, where she implored residents to assist individuals in evading federal immigration enforcement. The controversial video, which quickly went viral, shows Kim urging her constituents to provide groceries, escort workers, and monitor the activities of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents amid ongoing operations in the Twin Cities.

Kim highlighted an increase in federal activity, alleging that several individuals, including families with children, had been detained that morning. "It’s not even noon, and ICE has already kidnapped five of my neighbors," she stated in the video. She also claimed that federal agents in Minnesota outnumber the local police forces of St. Paul and Minneapolis combined.

In her call to action, Kim introduced a "mutual aid grocery run," designed to support those too fearful to shop due to the enforcement actions. Additionally, she requested that residents document any sightings of federal agents on city-owned properties and report them to her office, instructing, "If you see this, please record it to the best of your ability and submit to the Ward Five office."

Critics were quick to denounce Kim's actions, arguing that she is actively promoting interference with federal law enforcement and contributing to the rhetoric that has led to increased attacks on federal agents. Calls for her arrest and charges for assisting undocumented immigrants have intensified.

This incident is not the first time Kim has taken a confrontational stance against federal authorities. As reported by LifeZette, she previously demanded the arrest of an ICE agent involved in the fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis—an event that heightened scrutiny of ICE operations and led to widespread protests.

The backdrop of this controversy is a legal battle over sanctuary policies in Minnesota. In September 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice sued the State of Minnesota, the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, and other officials, claiming that local policies interfere with federal immigration enforcement and are unconstitutional.

Supporters of immigrant protections in Minnesota have organized responses to federal operations, such as alerting communities about ICE activities, providing transportation, and public accompaniment. These advocates assert that their actions are meant to ensure safety and fulfill community responsibilities, not to obstruct law enforcement.

St. Paul's municipal code reflects a commitment to immigrant communities, prohibiting the use of city resources for immigration enforcement or detaining individuals based solely on immigration status. Kim's stance has garnered support from local and statewide Democratic-aligned organizations, including endorsements from figures such as Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison and groups like the Twin Cities chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America.

As legal proceedings continue, the incident underscores the ongoing conflict between federal enforcement efforts and local protections for immigrant communities in sanctuary jurisdictions like St. Paul. The city finds itself at the crossroads of maintaining public safety, respecting federal authority, and supporting its vulnerable residents.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

Council Vice President Hwa Jeong Kim's call to support community members facing the threat of ICE raids is a testament to the humanitarian spirit that defines our society. She is not inciting lawlessness but rather promoting solidarity and the protection of human rights within her community. The federal government's aggressive stance against sanctuary cities like St. Paul is an overreach that undermines local autonomy and the safety of immigrant populations.

The language used by Kim to describe ICE activities may be strong, but it reflects the fear and trauma experienced by families who are suddenly torn apart by federal operations. Sanctuary policies are rooted in the principle of inclusion and the understanding that immigrant communities are integral to the social and economic fabric of our cities.

The legal challenge posed by the Department of Justice against Minnesota's sanctuary policies is an attempt to coerce local governments into compliance with a draconian immigration agenda. Local leaders like Kim are on the front lines, ensuring that their constituents are not subjected to undue harassment and that their rights are protected. It is the duty of local officials to prioritize the well-being of all residents, regardless of immigration status.

Conservative View

The actions of St. Paul City Council Vice President Hwa Jeong Kim represent a blatant disregard for the rule of law and federal authority. By instructing residents to aid individuals in evading ICE, Kim is not only promoting lawlessness but also endangering the safety of her community and the officers tasked with upholding immigration laws. The federal government’s lawsuit against Minnesota’s sanctuary policies is a necessary step to restore order and ensure that local jurisdictions do not impede the execution of federal mandates.

The assertion that ICE agents have "kidnapped" residents is irresponsible and inflammatory. Such language fosters distrust in law enforcement and potentially incites hostility towards agents performing their duties. Furthermore, the claim that federal agents outnumber local police is a clear attempt to paint a picture of an overbearing federal presence, which is misleading and unfounded.

It is imperative that elected officials respect the separation of powers and allow ICE to operate without interference. Those who obstruct the enforcement of immigration laws should be held accountable, as they are complicit in the violation of national sovereignty and the undermining of legal immigration processes. Upholding the law should be the foremost priority, and any actions contrary to this must be met with appropriate legal consequences.

Common Ground

Both conservative and progressive viewpoints can agree on the importance of public safety and the rule of law. There is a shared understanding that immigration policy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration of security, human rights, and community relations. Finding common ground may involve working towards comprehensive immigration reform that addresses the concerns of law enforcement while also providing humane and just treatment for those seeking a better life in the United States.