Sponsor Advertisement
Senator Introduces Bill to End Dual Citizenship in the US

Senator Introduces Bill to End Dual Citizenship in the US

Ohio Senator Bernie Moreno proposes a bill mandating U.S. citizens to renounce foreign citizenship or lose American status, stirring national debate.

Ohio Senator Bernie Moreno is set to introduce a bill, known as the Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025, that aims to abolish dual citizenship for Americans. If passed, this legislation would require U.S. citizens who also hold foreign nationality to pledge exclusive allegiance to the United States by renouncing their other citizenship. Failure to do so within a year would result in the forfeiture of their U.S. citizenship status.

Born in Colombia, Senator Moreno renounced his Colombian citizenship at 18, a decision he describes as a deeply personal and patriotic choice. "One of the greatest honors of my life was when I became an American citizen at 18, the first opportunity I could do so,” Moreno told Fox News Digital. He further emphasized the commitment required to be an American, stating, “It’s all or nothing."

The bill tasks the State Department and the Department of Homeland Security with creating mechanisms to ensure compliance. Those who lose their American citizenship under this law would be classified as aliens according to federal immigration statutes. While it is challenging to provide exact figures, analysts estimate millions of Americans could be affected, with potentially up to 40% eligible for dual nationality through ancestry.

The legislation has sparked a significant discussion about national identity and allegiance. Proponents argue it is necessary to protect national interests and resolve ambiguities around the responsibilities of American citizenship. There is particular concern about potential conflicts of interest for public officials holding dual citizenship. Previous legislative efforts have sought disclosure of foreign citizenship from lawmakers or even barred dual citizens from holding office.

However, the proposed law may face constitutional challenges. The Supreme Court's 1967 ruling in Afroyim v. Rusk established that U.S. citizenship cannot be involuntarily revoked. Legal experts suggest that forcing renunciation might contravene this precedent.

Internationally, some countries enforce similar strictures. Japan mandates a choice of nationality by age 22, and India revokes citizenship upon acquisition of foreign nationality, although it offers limited overseas citizenship rights as a compromise.

Moreno’s bill would position the U.S. closer to these international norms and signal a strong stance on exclusive national loyalty. This issue has not been a primary focus for President Donald Trump, who has previously questioned birthright citizenship but has not centered policy on dual citizenship.

The bill is a distinct legislative effort to define the boundaries of U.S. nationality and promote exclusive allegiance both legally and symbolically. Moreno underscores the bill's importance, reiterating the necessity for Americans to dedicate themselves entirely to the nation and its laws.

The proposed legislation has elicited a variety of responses, with some critics labeling it as extreme. Joey Mannarino, a commentator, expressed vehement opposition in a tweet, arguing that the blanket ban on dual citizenship is absurd and noting that many people are born with dual citizenship. Mannarino suggested a more measured approach, such as restricting dual citizens from serving in public office, rather than an outright prohibition.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025 introduced by Senator Bernie Moreno has generated concern from a progressive standpoint. Progressives might view this legislation as potentially regressive, denying individuals the ability to maintain diverse cultural identities and connections that dual citizenship often represents.

Critics within the progressive sphere are likely to argue that the bill overlooks the systemic complexities of immigration and citizenship. In a globalized world, many individuals are inherently connected to more than one nation, whether by birth, family, or other circumstances. Forcing a choice upon these individuals can be seen as an infringement on personal freedoms and an erosion of the rich multicultural fabric that progressives believe strengthens society.

Furthermore, the bill's impact on collective well-being is significant. The loss of U.S. citizenship could have detrimental effects on the lives of millions, potentially separating families and undermining the stability of communities that are already navigating the complexities of immigration laws. The progressive perspective would likely advocate for policies that accommodate the realities of a diverse citizenry rather than imposing strict legal limitations.

Additionally, from an equity standpoint, this legislation might disproportionately affect individuals who are less equipped to navigate the legal hurdles of renouncing their other citizenship, potentially leading to a form of socioeconomic discrimination.

Conservative View

The Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025 proposed by Senator Bernie Moreno embodies a conservative approach to national allegiance and citizenship. From a conservative perspective, the bill promotes a clear, unified national identity and loyalty which are foundational to a country's integrity and security.

The legislation advocates for the principle of individual liberty by ensuring that each citizen's allegiance is not divided, thereby reinforcing the sanctity of the American civic commitment. It also echoes the concept of limited government, as it aims to prevent conflicts of interest within the government by delineating a clear standard for citizenship and allegiance.

Requiring exclusive allegiance to the U.S. could also be seen as a means to enhance economic efficiency. By clarifying citizenship status, the bill could potentially streamline legal processes and reduce complexities associated with dual nationals, such as tax obligations and legal rights, which can currently present bureaucratic challenges.

Moreover, the bill upholds traditional values by emphasizing the act of choosing to be American as a significant and deliberate decision, one that should not be diluted by divided loyalties. The conservative viewpoint values personal responsibility, and this legislation calls for a personal commitment to the nation-state that is clear and undivided.

Common Ground

Despite differing opinions on the Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025, there may be common ground in the aim to ensure the integrity of U.S. citizenship. Both conservative and progressive viewpoints might agree that clear laws are necessary to define and uphold the responsibilities and privileges of citizenship.

Both sides may also converge on the desire for a transparent and efficient legal system that can effectively manage citizenship status without causing undue hardship to individuals. Moreover, there could be bipartisan support for measures that protect national security and public office integrity, such as requiring disclosure of dual citizenship for elected officials.

Finding a balanced approach that respects individual rights while safeguarding national interests could serve as a point of unity. Collaboration on refining the bill to address constitutional concerns and provide humane solutions for those with complex citizenship scenarios could be a constructive way forward.