Sponsor Advertisement
Secret Service Investigates Influencer Over "8647" Trump Post

Secret Service Investigates Influencer Over "8647" Trump Post

The US Secret Service visited left-wing influencer Ed Krassenstein over a post containing "8647," which was perceived as a potential threat to former President Trump. Krassenstein defended the post as a call for Trump's removal from office.

On Friday, the Secret Service confronted Ed Krassenstein, a prominent left-wing social media figure, at his residence following a contentious online post. The post in question displayed the sequence "8647," which agents interpreted as a veiled threat directed at former President Donald Trump. This visit occurred shortly after James Comey, the former FBI Director, shared an Instagram image with the same numbers arranged in seashells.

Federal authorities swiftly engaged with both men to ascertain their intentions behind these cryptic messages. Krassenstein, in a revealing Substack article, recounted the encounter, labeling it an excessive reaction. According to Krassenstein, "8647" is a slogan used by Democrats to signify the desired impeachment or legal ejection of Trump, presumably the 47th president if he secures another term. He elaborated that "86" is slang for elimination, used commonly in the restaurant industry, and "47" alludes to Trump's potential presidential number.

The agents who visited Krassenstein, after hearing his explanation, reportedly did not consider him a threat. Nonetheless, the incident has sparked considerable debate, with Krassenstein accusing the Trump administration of utilizing federal agencies to quash political opposition and dissent.

The initial probe was catalyzed by Comey's vague Instagram post captioned, “Cool shell formation on my beach walk.” This post was interpreted by many as provocative, especially in the political context. President Trump, in an interview with Fox News, condemned the post, suggesting that even a child could infer it meant "assassination." Comey, 64, removed the post amidst the outcry and denied any intention of advocating violence.

Comey also faced questioning at the Secret Service's Washington field office, where agents reviewed his social media history and public statements for any patterns of concern. Although no charges have been pressed, the cases have been treated seriously due to the potential security implications for a former president.

Krassenstein took to social media to voice his opposition to violence, arguing that misconstruing the "8647" message could lead to actual violence. He also released a video on Twitter, seemingly to verify the Secret Service's visit and counter skeptics.

Despite the controversy, Krassenstein acknowledged the professionalism of the Secret Service agents and maintained that his post was a political statement, not an incitement to violence. This incident highlights the delicate balance between free speech and perceived threats in the politically charged atmosphere surrounding former President Trump.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The Secret Service's investigation into Ed Krassenstein's use of "8647" raises concerns about freedom of expression and the potential for government overreach. Krassenstein's explanation of the term as a political slogan, not a call to violence, is consistent with its known usage at Democratic protests. The rapid escalation to a federal inquiry over a social media post could be perceived as an intimidation tactic against those critical of the Trump administration.

The assertion by Krassenstein that the government may be misusing its resources to suppress dissent echoes a broader progressive worry about the erosion of democratic norms. Transparency and accountability in law enforcement activities are crucial to maintaining public trust and ensuring that citizens can freely express their political views without fear of retribution.

Conservative View

The Secret Service's visit to Ed Krassenstein represents due diligence in protecting a former president's security. Given the current political climate, where threats can be veiled in various forms of communication, it's imperative that all potential risks are investigated thoroughly. The Secret Service must remain vigilant, especially where cryptic messages like "8647" arise, which may hold a deeper meaning than the simplistic explanations offered.

Krassenstein's portrayal of the visit as an overreaction is shortsighted. The responsibility to protect former presidents is not a matter to be taken lightly, and the insinuation that the Trump administration weaponized federal resources is a serious accusation lacking substantial evidence. It's essential to uphold the rule of law and ensure that political discourse does not cross into the realm of endangering individuals' safety, regardless of political affiliation.

Common Ground

Both conservatives and progressives can agree that the safety of all individuals, especially public figures and former presidents, is paramount. The Secret Service has a duty to investigate any potential threats, and their actions in this case align with that obligation. Moreover, there is a shared understanding that political discourse should not devolve into threats or actions of violence. Acknowledging the importance of clear communication and responsible rhetoric is a step towards ensuring that political disagreements are settled through democratic processes, not through intimidation or fear.