Sponsor Advertisement
RFK Jr. Advisor Accused of Abusing Power in MAHA Feud

RFK Jr. Advisor Accused of Abusing Power in MAHA Feud

A leaked call reveals a dispute within the Make America Healthy Again movement, involving threats and federal complaints against advisor Calley Means and CEO Peter Gillooly.

The Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement, known for its opposition to traditional healthcare and government regulations, finds itself in the throes of an internal power struggle. At the heart of the controversy are Calley Means, an advisor to environmental lawyer and anti-vaccine advocate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and Peter Gillooly, CEO of The Wellness Company. A leaked phone call and formal complaints reveal accusations of threats, abuse of power, and potential coercion involving federal positions.

The feud came to light after Gillooly filed a complaint with the U.S. Office of the Special Counsel and the HHS Inspector General on Saturday. He alleges that Means, using his government role, attempted to intimidate his company into a partnership with Means' health startup, Truemed. The startup's business model allows customers to purchase wellness products with pre-tax health spending accounts, an increasingly popular option among conservative Americans.

Rift TV released a recording in which Means accuses The Wellness Company of disseminating harmful information about Truemed to investigative journalist Laura Loomer. Loomer recently reported that Truemed provided unverified doctor’s notes for customers to misuse health savings accounts for supplement purchases. In the call, Means is heard issuing a direct threat of legal action and potential backlash from influential figures if the alleged sharing of information continued.

The controversy extends beyond the immediate conflict as Means' dual roles as a government advisor and private company executive draw scrutiny. Before his HHS involvement, Means worked as a strategist for Republican campaigns and was recognized for his criticisms of big pharma and government health policy, gaining attention on platforms such as The Joe Rogan Experience.

As part of the dispute, Loomer has accused Truemed of tax fraud and questioned the nomination of Casey Means, Calley's sister, as Surgeon General, citing her lack of support for Donald Trump and an inactive medical license. The accusations have sparked backlash among conservatives, with Nicole Shanahan, RFK Jr.'s former running mate, expressing confusion over the appointment.

Gillooly's complaint alleges that Means sought to "blackmail" his private corporation and implied negative consequences from HHS leadership if The Wellness Company did not collaborate with Truemed. This clash highlights the delicate balance between public service and private interests and raises concerns about the abuse of government power.

The Wellness Company, recognized for its supplements and alternative COVID-19 treatments, is supported by a customer base that values its position as a counter to mainstream medicine and government healthcare. The company's advisory board includes prominent figures like Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Kelly Victory, known for their critiques of pandemic protocols and vaccine mandates.

As the situation escalates, the parties involved are calling for accountability rather than personal apologies. The broader implications for the MAHA movement and the integrity of federal positions remain to be seen, as the public and authorities weigh in on this unfolding controversy.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The unfolding drama within the Make America Healthy Again movement underscores the importance of ethical conduct and the need for proper checks and balances in our government systems. Progressives understand that a democracy thrives when its leaders are held to the highest standards of accountability and transparency. The accusations against Calley Means suggest a possible exploitation of public office for private benefit, which is antithetical to the ethical governance that progressives champion.

The situation also highlights concerns about nepotism and the potential influence of personal relationships on public appointments. The scrutiny surrounding Casey Means' nomination as Surgeon General, based on qualifications and ideological alignment, reflects the progressive value of meritocracy and diversity in public service.

Furthermore, the allegations against Truemed raise questions about the responsible stewardship of health savings accounts and the critical role of oversight in ensuring that these funds are used for legitimate medical expenses. Progressives advocate for a healthcare system that is accessible, accountable, and free from fraudulent practices. This incident serves as a reminder of the necessity for vigilant oversight in all aspects of healthcare administration.

Conservative View

The allegations against Calley Means, if true, represent a severe breach of trust and an abuse of the power entrusted to public servants. The conservative viewpoint emphasizes the sanctity of free enterprise and the dangers of governmental overreach. It is crucial to maintain a clear separation between government roles and personal business interests to prevent conflicts of interest. The purported actions by Means could be seen as an attempt to leverage his position for personal gain, undermining the principles of fairness and transparency that are foundational to the American system.

Moreover, this incident raises questions about the credibility of the individuals involved in the MAHA movement and their commitment to its purported values. For a movement that champions health freedom and criticizes the overreach of government in personal health decisions, the alleged coercion by a government advisor is particularly troubling. It belies a hypocrisy that cannot be overlooked and warrants a thorough investigation to ensure that public officials act in the best interest of the people, not their own business interests.

The conservative base demands accountability and, should these allegations be substantiated, appropriate consequences for any abuse of power. Integrity in public service must be upheld, and any actions that compromise this integrity should be met with swift and decisive action.

Common Ground

Both conservatives and progressives can agree that the integrity of public servants is paramount. No one should exploit a government position for personal gain or to exert undue influence over private enterprises. There is a shared understanding that ethical breaches, such as the ones alleged in the MAHA movement dispute, undermine public trust and the efficacy of health and government institutions.

Additionally, both sides recognize the need for transparency and accountability in healthcare practices. Regardless of political stance, there is consensus that health savings accounts must be safeguarded from abuse and that consumers should have access to legitimate and duly verified medical resources.

Ultimately, the common ground lies in the commitment to uphold the principles of justice and the rule of law, ensuring that all actions by public officials are conducted with the public's best interests at heart.