Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) stirred controversy on Tuesday with a provocative social media post that connected President John F. Kennedy's assassination to his opposition to Israel's nuclear program. This bold statement arose amidst her criticism of President Donald Trump's recent military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Greene's post on platform X, intended as a defense against detractors, has quickly gained national attention for its striking historical allusion.
"There was once a great President that the American people loved. He opposed Israel’s nuclear program. And then he was assassinated," Greene stated in her post. This comment was part of a larger discourse with Fox News host Mark Levin, who had sharply criticized Greene for her stance against Trump's actions in Iran, labeling her as "stupid" and encouraging her to "keep banging your head against the wall."
Greene's response to Levin was multifaceted and impassioned. She accused him of using threatening rhetoric akin to that of individuals who send her death threats daily. "This is extremely sick and disturbing," she wrote, pledging to pray for Levin but also to be vigilant.
The congresswoman's insertion of the JFK reference seemed to imply a parallel between the risks of dissenting against military engagement and the tragic fate of leaders who have done so. She also hinted at concerns for her safety due to her outspoken views. In the early 1960s, Kennedy did indeed express apprehensions regarding Israel's nuclear capabilities, demanding that the nation allow inspections of its Dimona nuclear facility for global security reasons. While Israel has never officially acknowledged having nuclear arms, it is widely believed to have developed them covertly during the Cold War era.
Greene's comments reflect her broader foreign policy philosophy: advocating for peace and opposing U.S. military interventions abroad. She has been consistent in her view that American stability should not be compromised by entanglement in endless overseas conflicts.
The exchange between Greene and Levin comes at a time of heightened debate over Trump's decision to target Iranian nuclear facilities. While the move has garnered support from many Republicans, Greene has maintained a cautious approach, citing the risks of potential escalation.
Greene is no stranger to controversy, having previously made headlines for her remarks on foreign policy, military action, and even unconventional theories regarding wildfires. Her latest public statements underscore her divergence from mainstream Republican views on U.S. military involvement overseas.
It remains uncertain whether Greene's JFK comparison was meant as a literal accusation or a figurative historical observation. However, her words have unmistakably distinguished her position from those of many fellow Republicans on matters of foreign policy and military action. A representative for Levin has yet to respond to the exchange.
