⚡ BREAKING NEWS
Sponsor Advertisement
President Trump Criticizes Fox News Host Jessica Tarlov

President Trump Criticizes Fox News Host Jessica Tarlov

President Donald Trump publicly criticized Fox News co-host Jessica Tarlov during a live call to "The Five" on March 26, 2026, stating the show would be "better without her" due to her use of "fake numbers" in polling discussions. Tarlov, absent from the broadcast, promptly responded on social me...

President Donald Trump engaged in a pointed critique of Fox News co-host Jessica Tarlov during a telephone appearance on the network's popular program, "The Five," on Thursday, March 26, 2026. Speaking directly to the panel, President Trump singled out Tarlov, a Democratic political strategist and rotating co-host, who was not present for that day's broadcast. His remarks ignited a public exchange that swiftly extended to social media, highlighting ongoing tensions between the President and certain media personalities.

The President initiated the commentary by expressing general approval for the show before specifically addressing Tarlov's absence. "I like all of your shows," President Trump stated to the hosts. He then added, "I’m glad Jessica’s not there. No, actually, I think your show would be better without her. But who am I to say that? I think it would be a lot better." This direct assessment immediately set the tone for the remainder of his appearance regarding Tarlov.

Host Jesse Watters, seizing on the moment, extended an invitation to President Trump for a future in-person appearance. "Mr. President, the next time you do this on ‘The Five,’ can we have you on set? Because we really want you to sit next to Jessica," Watters asked. He continued, "I think you’d be a good influence on her. Can you do that?" President Trump responded without hesitation, elaborating on the basis of his criticism, which centered on Tarlov's on-air use of polling data.

"I watch Jessica, and I’m not a fan. And she uses fake numbers. She’ll give, ‘Well, he’s only polling 42%.’ That’s not right… Actually. Uh, you know, polls are just like, I hate people that use fake polls because polls are just like bad journalists. You know, bad journalists, they write fake stories. Well, fake polls do damage also, but that’s the thing. I’m sure she’s a lovely person," President Trump asserted.

These remarks were made on the same day Fox News released survey results indicating President Trump’s disapproval rating had reached its highest point ever recorded in that specific poll. The Fox News poll registered 59 percent of registered voters disapproving of President Trump’s job performance, with 47 percent expressing strong disapproval. A separate Fox News poll, released the day prior, placed President Trump’s overall job approval at 41 percent. Among Republican voters specifically, President Trump’s approval fell to 82 percent—its lowest point of his second term, marking a ten-point drop from 92 percent just one year earlier in March 2025. During the same television appearance, President Trump also referenced a CNN poll, which he claimed showed 100 percent approval among self-described MAGA voters, particularly concerning his stance on Iran.

Later in the discussion, President Trump inquired about Tarlov's absence directly. "Tell me, did she not wanna do it, or did you kick her off the show?" he asked Watters. Watters quickly clarified, "No. We didn’t kick her off. She had a previous schedule that she couldn’t change."

Despite her absence from the studio, Tarlov was clearly monitoring the broadcast. She took to X (formerly Twitter) that evening to respond directly to a clip of President Trump’s comments. "Was so bummed to miss the show today! But I definitely would’ve said he’s even inflating his numbers to 42%!" she posted, directly challenging President Trump's earlier statement.

This most recent exchange marks another chapter in an ongoing public disagreement between President Trump and Tarlov. Last July, following Tarlov's advocacy for gun control measures in the wake of a New York City shooting, President Trump posted on Truth Social, "I can’t stand Jessica Tarlov of THE FIVE. A real loser!!! DJT." The day before President Trump’s phone appearance, Tarlov had also appeared on "The Five," where she referenced a reported "daily war snuff film briefing" President Trump receives from aides, along with comments regarding the U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran. Despite the President's pointed criticism, Jesse Watters reiterated his appreciation for Tarlov during the broadcast, stating, "She’s a lovely person. We’re working on her. Don’t worry." The continuing dialogue underscores the dynamic relationship between political leaders and media figures in contemporary American discourse.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

Progressives view President Trump's public criticism of Jessica Tarlov as problematic, particularly given his position as a sitting President. The use of a presidential platform to personally attack a cable news co-host, especially when she is absent, raises concerns about the chilling effect on media criticism and the broader erosion of trust in democratic institutions. From this perspective, a President's comments carry significant weight and can be perceived as an attempt to intimidate or silence dissenting voices within the media, rather than engaging in a substantive policy debate.

The President's dismissive remarks about Tarlov's use of polling data, juxtaposed with the release of Fox News polls showing his own declining approval, underscore a pattern of questioning inconvenient facts. Progressives argue that a healthy democracy relies on a free and independent press that can report on public opinion without fear of reprisal from those in power. Attacking the messenger, or the data itself, rather than addressing the underlying reasons for public sentiment, is seen as undermining the public's ability to make informed decisions. Furthermore, the personal nature of the attacks, such as calling Tarlov "a real loser," contributes to a toxic political discourse that discourages constructive dialogue and fosters division, rather than promoting collective well-being and respectful engagement.

Conservative View

From a conservative perspective, President Trump's critique of Jessica Tarlov reflects a broader concern about media accountability and the perceived bias in political reporting and polling. Conservatives often emphasize the importance of scrutinizing media narratives, particularly when they involve statistics or public opinion data that may be presented selectively or out of context. President Trump, as a prominent public figure, is seen as exercising his right to challenge what he views as inaccurate or misleading information, a stance consistent with the belief that individuals should not passively accept media portrayals.

The President's assertion that Tarlov uses "fake numbers" and his comparison of "fake polls" to "bad journalists" resonates with a segment of the population that feels traditional media outlets often operate with a progressive slant. For conservatives, a robust public sphere requires that all voices, including those of elected officials, can challenge the premises and conclusions presented by media personalities. This is not about stifling dissent but ensuring that media figures are held to account for the factual basis of their commentary. The focus on individual liberty extends to freedom of speech for all, including the President, to express his opinions on media performance, encouraging a more critical and discerning public engagement with news and analysis. This perspective champions the idea that transparency and accuracy in reporting are paramount, and when these are perceived to be lacking, public figures have a responsibility to speak out.

Common Ground

Despite the clear differences in perspective regarding President Trump's public criticism of Jessica Tarlov, there are areas of common ground that both conservatives and progressives can acknowledge. Both sides generally agree on the importance of accurate information in public discourse. While they may disagree on what constitutes "accurate" or how information is presented, the shared value of truth and factual integrity is fundamental. There is also a mutual interest in the transparency of polling methodologies and data interpretation, ensuring that the public understands the basis of reported statistics.

Both viewpoints also recognize the value of robust debate and the inclusion of diverse perspectives in media. While conservatives might emphasize the President's right to challenge media narratives, and progressives might stress the media's right to critique power, both implicitly support a dynamic environment where ideas and information can be openly discussed. Furthermore, there's a shared understanding that public figures, including presidents and media personalities, play a significant role in shaping public discourse. Fostering an environment where disagreements can be aired without devolving into purely personal attacks, and where the focus remains on ideas and policies, is a goal that transcends ideological divides. Ultimately, a well-informed citizenry is a shared aspiration, even if the pathways to achieving it are debated.