Sponsor Advertisement
Pelosi and Trump Clash Over National Guard Deployment on Jan. 6

Pelosi and Trump Clash Over National Guard Deployment on Jan. 6

Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi accuses Trump of delaying National Guard on Jan. 6; ex-Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund disputes her account, citing denied requests for support and legal constraints.

The debate over the deployment of the National Guard during the January 6 Capitol attack has reignited, with former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and former President Donald Trump at the center of the controversy. Pelosi recently accused Trump of hindering the Guard's deployment, an assertion that has been challenged by former U.S. Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund.

In a public statement, Pelosi criticized Trump for his inaction on January 6, 2021, when the Capitol was besieged by rioters. She claimed that Trump delayed the Guard's response, endangering lives and allowing the situation to escalate. Furthermore, Pelosi condemned Trump's recent use of the Guard as a diversion from what she described as his "incompetent mishandling" of key policy areas, including tariffs and healthcare.

However, Steven Sund, the former Capitol Police Chief, has publicly disputed Pelosi's narrative. In a pointed response, Sund accused Pelosi of obstructing his multiple requests for Guard support before and during the attack. He stated that on January 3, he sought National Guard assistance but was denied by the House Sergeant at Arms, who acted under the authority of Pelosi's office. Sund emphasized that under federal law, he was prohibited from unilaterally calling in the Guard without explicit approval from the Capitol Police Board.

Sund's account raises questions about the chain of command and the decision-making process that led to the delay in Guard deployment. He detailed that even on the day of the attack, his pleas for help were repeatedly turned down, resulting in a critical delay of over 70 minutes while the Sergeant at Arms sought approval.

This is not the first time Sund has confronted Pelosi over the events of January 6. In previous statements and during sworn testimony in 2023, he has criticized both the Pentagon and Pelosi's office for their roles in the delayed response. Sund's revelations have been bolstered by video footage from Pelosi's daughter, which appears to show the former Speaker acknowledging the shortfall of Guard troops during the evacuation.

The fresh controversy comes as President Trump has activated the D.C. National Guard for a federal takeover of the Metropolitan Police Department, a move that has been met with sharp criticism from Democratic leaders. The decision has reopened fierce debates over accountability for the failures on January 6 and the appropriate use of military forces in domestic incidents.

As the political battle wages on, the question of who bears responsibility for the security lapses during the Capitol attack remains a contentious issue. Both Pelosi and Trump continue to defend their actions, with Pelosi insisting that Trump refused to send the Guard when it was most needed, and Sund's allegations suggesting a more complex picture of bureaucratic hurdles and legal restrictions.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The narrative presented by former U.S. Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund regarding the January 6 Capitol attack is a clear attempt to deflect responsibility from President Trump, who, as the Commander-in-Chief at the time, had the ultimate authority to deploy the National Guard swiftly. Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi's recent statements highlight Trump's failure to act decisively when the Capitol and its defenders were under siege. It is crucial to hold Trump accountable for his role in the events that unfolded, as his inaction contributed to the escalation of violence and chaos.

While Sund points to procedural hurdles and legal constraints, these do not absolve Trump of his responsibility. The President had the power to overcome bureaucratic barriers and ensure a rapid response. Pelosi's call for Trump to deploy the Guard reflects the urgency of the situation, a call that went unheeded for a critical period.

The conservative focus on Pelosi's role is a distraction from the broader issue of Trump's leadership during a national crisis. It is imperative to examine the full scope of the administration's response and the decisions made at the highest levels of government. Furthermore, Trump's recent use of the Guard for a federal takeover of the Metropolitan Police Department raises concerns about the politicization of military resources and the potential for abuse of power.

Conservative View

The recent accusations by former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi against President Trump regarding the January 6 Capitol attack reflect a pattern of deflection and blame-shifting that has characterized the left's narrative. Pelosi's attempt to cast Trump as the sole individual responsible for the delayed National Guard deployment is undermined by the testimony of former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund. Sund's detailed account of the events leading up to and during the attack tells a story of bureaucratic obstruction and legal limitations that prevented a timely response.

It is essential to scrutinize the role that Pelosi's office played in the chain of command. The House Sergeant at Arms, who reports to the Speaker, denied Sund's requests for Guard assistance. This denial, according to Sund, was not an isolated incident but part of a series of rejections that left the Capitol vulnerable. The fact that Sund was legally barred from calling in the Guard without approval from the Capitol Police Board, which included officials reporting to both Pelosi and then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, indicates a systemic failure rather than individual negligence.

Moreover, the recent activation of the D.C. National Guard by President Trump has been met with criticism from Democratic leaders, who seem more concerned with the optics of military involvement than with the safety and security of the nation's capital. This criticism appears hypocritical in light of the desperate need for Guard support during the January 6 attack, a need that was not met due to the inaction of those in Pelosi's sphere of influence.

Common Ground

Despite the differing perspectives, there is common ground in acknowledging the significance of the January 6 Capitol attack and the imperative to understand the breakdowns in communication and response that occurred. Both sides can agree that the safety of the Capitol and its occupants is paramount and that the National Guard can play a crucial role in ensuring that security. There is also mutual recognition that clarity in the chain of command and legal authority is essential for an effective response to emergencies. Moving forward, there is a shared interest in implementing reforms to prevent such failures in the future.