Sponsor Advertisement
New York City Mayoral Candidate's Support PAC Linked to Controversial Palestinian Group

New York City Mayoral Candidate's Support PAC Linked to Controversial Palestinian Group

A PAC backing NYC mayoral hopeful Zohran Mamdani is under scrutiny for its connections to a New Jersey Palestinian organization linked to a terror group. The PAC spent over $36,000 on ads promoting free city bus fares, with ties to a group involved in a recent attack on Israel.

The political landscape of New York City is facing scrutiny as a leading mayoral candidate, Zohran Mamdani, receives significant campaign support from a political action committee with controversial ties. The PAC, named We the People, America For All, has expended upwards of $36,000 on video billboard advertisements championing Mamdani's initiative to eliminate fares for city buses, according to city campaign finance records.

The financial trail leads to The Truth Project, the PAC's primary donor, spearheaded by New Jersey attorney Abed Awad. Awad is a prominent figure within the Palestinian-American Community Center in Clifton, New Jersey, where he holds a treasurer position for the PAC. The center itself has come under intense scrutiny following its annual conference in April, which featured a livestream from Wisam Rafeedie, a member of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP). This group, based in Syria and designated as a terrorist organization, was involved in the October 7, 2023, attack on Israel and has a history of violent acts, including the infamous 1972 attack on Israeli airport passengers.

Analysts from the Network Contagion Research Center (NCRI), including senior advisor Alex Goldenberg, have expressed concerns that the PAC's advertisements, which focus on the popular proposal of free bus fares, may be part of an entryist strategy. This tactic allows fringe groups to gain a foothold in mainstream politics by aligning themselves with widely accepted, uncontroversial issues, potentially masking their true intentions.

Further complicating the issue, the PAC has connections to the "Uncommitted" movement, which caused a significant rift within the Democratic Party in 2024. Abed Awad played a role in this campaign, which discouraged Arab-Americans from supporting the Democratic ticket of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris due to their stance on Israel. His son, Ahmad Awad, was an "Uncommitted" delegate at the Democratic National Convention and is among the founding trustees of The Truth Project.

The Truth Project's co-founder, Washington D.C. consultant Mohammed "Mo" Maraqa, has a history of involvement in political digital strategy, having worked with the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee during the 2024 election cycle. Maraqa and Awad have denied any personal association with the PFLP or its affiliates, and Awad has insisted that all organizations follow city and state regulations, denying any financial or governance involvement with the PAC.

As the mayoral race intensifies, the PAC continues to promote Mamdani's platform, although questions persist regarding the influence of organizations with ties to groups linked to terrorism in local politics. This unfolding story highlights the complexities and potential risks of political funding in an era where local elections can be influenced by international issues and affiliations.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

While the connections between We the People, America For All and a group with alleged ties to terrorism are concerning, it is important to approach the situation with a commitment to due process and avoid guilt by association. The progressive stance values inclusivity and the right to participate in political discourse, regardless of one's background or affiliations. It is crucial, however, that all organizations involved in political funding operate with transparency and within the bounds of the law.

The focus on free public transportation is a policy that aligns with progressive values, aiming to provide equitable access to essential services for all residents. The potential misuse of such policies by groups with ulterior motives should not detract from the legitimacy and importance of the policies themselves.

Moreover, the progressive viewpoint recognizes the need for reform within campaign finance laws to ensure that all political contributions are fully disclosed and that there is no room for foreign interference in our elections. The influence of money in politics is a bipartisan concern, and measures should be taken to safeguard the integrity of our political system.

Conservative View

The revelation of We the People, America For All's connections to a New Jersey-based Palestinian organization with ties to terrorism is deeply concerning. It is imperative to scrutinize the sources of political funding, especially when it may be linked to groups that have engaged in violent acts against our ally, Israel. This situation is indicative of a broader issue where radical ideologies are seeping into mainstream politics under the guise of populist policies, such as free public transportation.

It is essential that we maintain vigilance against such entryist strategies that could allow extremist views to gain legitimacy. The Democratic Party's internal division, exacerbated by the "Uncommitted" movement, reflects a troubling trend where fringe elements are disrupting party unity and potentially influencing election outcomes. The loss of critical states in the 2024 election to President Trump can be partially attributed to this splintering.

Furthermore, the lack of transparency regarding the source of the PAC's funding for pro-Mamdani advertisements is unacceptable. It is crucial that all political action committees adhere to strict disclosure standards to prevent the infiltration of foreign and possibly malignant influences into American politics. The conservative perspective emphasizes the importance of national security and the integrity of our democratic processes, which are potentially at risk in scenarios such as this.

Common Ground

Both conservative and progressive viewpoints can agree on the necessity for transparency and integrity in campaign financing. Ensuring that political contributions are fully disclosed and not influenced by foreign entities is a shared interest that transcends political divides. Additionally, there is a mutual understanding of the importance of safeguarding democratic processes and preventing the exploitation of political systems by groups with potentially harmful agendas.