Sponsor Advertisement
Musk vs. Soros: Titans Clash in Historic Wisconsin Supreme Court Race

Musk vs. Soros: Titans Clash in Historic Wisconsin Supreme Court Race

In Wisconsin's most expensive judicial race ever, Elon Musk and George Soros back opposing candidates, signaling a battle of ideologies and the influence of corporate America in politics.

A high-profile election for Wisconsin's Supreme Court seat on Tuesday has drawn national attention due to the involvement of two of the world's most influential political donors—Elon Musk and George Soros. This judicial race has set records for its campaign spending, with contributions exceeding $73 million and projections indicating it may reach $100 million by Election Day, according to the Brennan Center for Justice.

Elon Musk, known for his support of conservative causes, has invested heavily in the race, endorsing Republican candidate Brad Schimel with a combined $20 million from his super PACs—America PAC and Building America's Future. Musk has even taken to the campaign trail in Wisconsin, showcasing his commitment to the race.

In contrast, George Soros, a prominent backer of liberal initiatives, has supported Democratic candidate Susan Crawford by donating $1 million to the Wisconsin Democratic Party. Crawford's campaign has also attracted contributions from unions, Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker, and Gloria Page, mother of Google co-founder Larry Page.

The stakes of this election are high, with the current liberal majority on the court holding at 4-3. A victory for Schimel could shift the balance to conservative control, an outcome endorsed by former President Donald Trump and actively campaigned for by Donald Trump Jr.

Both campaigns have employed strategies to leverage their high-profile backers. Crawford has labeled the race as "The People v. Musk," attempting to tie Schimel to Musk's controversial influence. The election is seen as a barometer for the political climate in the United States, with implications for the 2028 presidential election, the future of abortion laws in Wisconsin, and key judiciary decisions.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court will play a critical role in deciding issues like the redrawing of congressional districts and voting rules. The state's abortion laws have been in the spotlight since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, leading to a temporary cessation of abortion services until a lower court's ruling in 2023. The elected judge will serve a ten-year term, shaping the state's trajectory well into the future.

Adding to the race's significance, Elon Musk's Tesla has a pending lawsuit in Wisconsin that could potentially reach the Supreme Court, challenging a state law that prevents manufacturers from operating their own dealerships.

As election day approaches, the battle between Musk and Soros encapsulates the broader struggle between conservative and liberal visions for America, with the outcome set to influence both the state and the nation's future.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

Progressive supporters see the involvement of George Soros and the substantial funding for Susan Crawford as a defense against the encroachment of corporate influence in politics, emblematic of a broader fight for democracy and social justice. The framing of the election as "The People v. Musk" serves to highlight concerns over the disproportionate impact of billionaire donors on public institutions. Progressives argue that the election is about protecting the rights of marginalized communities, ensuring access to reproductive health care, and promoting fair electoral processes. They contend that the liberal majority on the Wisconsin Supreme Court must be preserved to continue advancing civil liberties and addressing socioeconomic inequalities.

Conservative View

The Wisconsin Supreme Court election has become a battleground for conservative values, with Elon Musk's substantial financial support embodying a fight for judicial integrity and the preservation of traditional principles. Conservatives view the involvement of Musk and other like-minded donors as essential in counteracting what they perceive as liberal overreach, particularly in light of recent decisions affecting religious liberties, electoral integrity, and the right to life. The support for Brad Schimel signifies a pushback against the progressive agenda, aiming to secure a conservative judiciary that upholds the rule of law and curtails activist jurisprudence. The high spending is justified as necessary to maintain a fair judicial system that reflects the will of the people rather than succumbing to special interests that often fund liberal candidates.

Common Ground

Both conservative and progressive blocs can agree on the critical importance of the Wisconsin Supreme Court election for the state's future. There is a shared recognition of the judiciary's role in shaping pivotal legal precedents and the need for a transparent electoral process that represents the voters' interests. Despite their differences, both sides aim to mobilize voters and engage in the democratic process, highlighting the election's significance in determining the direction of Wisconsin's legal landscape for years to come.