Sponsor Advertisement
Minnesota Axe Murderer Granted Parole After 36 Years

Minnesota Axe Murderer Granted Parole After 36 Years

David Francis Brom, convicted of murdering his family with an axe in 1988, has been granted parole under a new Minnesota law. Brom, who served 36 years, was 16 at the time of the crime and is now transitioning back into society in a controversial law signed by Tim Walz.

David Francis Brom, now 54, who was convicted at the age of 16 for the brutal axe murders of his parents and two siblings in 1988, has been granted parole by the Minnesota Department of Corrections’ Supervised Release Board on Monday. The board's decision comes after Brom served 36 years of three consecutive life sentences, a period reduced under a 2023 law that allows offenders sentenced as minors to seek parole earlier.

The gruesome crime took place in Rochester, where police discovered the bodies of 41-year-old Bernard and Paulette Brom, alongside their children, 13-year-old Diane and 11-year-old Rick, with severe head and upper-body injuries. The bloody axe was found at the scene. Following a dispute with his father, Brom confessed to the murders.

In July 2025, Brom transitioned to work release and relocated to a supervised halfway house in the Twin Cities area. He secured employment in cabinetry and began adapting to the modern world he had been absent from for decades, including upgrading from a flip phone to a smartphone and learning to navigate digital society, as reported by MinneapoliMedia.

Corrections officials have noted Brom's consistent and disciplined behavior, marred only by a single minor infraction over more than 35 years. During Monday’s parole hearing, the focus was on Brom's accountability, coping strategies, and readiness to reenter society. The board, voting 5–2, favored release with strict conditions such as employment, regular reporting, geographic restrictions, and compliance with correctional programming. They emphasized that parole does not negate the severity of his crimes and any violation could lead to immediate re-incarceration.

The parole decision has been met with criticism from Republican lawmakers, who attribute it to Democratic legislation signed by Governor Tim Walz in 2023. This law reduced mandatory prison terms for offenders sentenced to life as minors, a move that House Speaker Lisa Demuth and State Rep. Duane Quam argue undermines justice for victims' families and public safety.

The case highlights the evolving landscape of juvenile sentencing law in the United States. Landmark Supreme Court rulings, such as Miller v. Alabama, have prohibited mandatory life without parole for minors, necessitating states like Minnesota to revise statutes and offer parole review.

Brom's reentry process, which he likened to stepping out of a "time capsule," involves adjusting to new technologies, social norms, and work environments. He has cited structure, faith, and guidance as crucial in navigating this transition.

The debate over rehabilitation and public safety has been reignited by Brom's parole. While some advocate for the importance of reintegrating long-term inmates, others argue that certain crimes warrant full sentences without parole. Survivors and the community continue to deal with the aftermath of Brom's actions, and Minnesota now faces the task of balancing rehabilitative opportunities for former juvenile offenders with the need for justice and safety in its communities.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The parole of David Francis Brom represents a progressive step toward a more rehabilitative and humane justice system. The 2023 law that facilitated his early parole reflects an understanding that individuals, especially those sentenced as minors, can change and deserve a chance at redemption. Progressives argue that lifelong incarceration without the possibility of parole for crimes committed by juveniles is an outdated and cruel practice that does not account for the capacity for growth and rehabilitation.

The emphasis on rehabilitation over retribution is rooted in the belief that the justice system should focus on preparing individuals for reentry into society. Brom's case, with his demonstrated good behavior and commitment to adapting to modern life, exemplifies the potential for transformation. The conditions of his parole, which include employment and compliance with correctional programming, are structured to support his successful reintegration.

Progressives highlight the importance of second chances, particularly for those who were minors at the time of their offense. They point to the Supreme Court rulings that recognize the unconstitutional nature of mandatory life without parole for minors. The progressive viewpoint stresses the need to balance justice with compassion and the potential for rehabilitation, arguing that a society is judged by how it treats its most troubled members.

Conservative View

The parole of David Francis Brom is a stark reminder of the consequences of lenient policies on violent crime. The decision by the Minnesota Department of Corrections’ Supervised Release Board, influenced by the 2023 legislation, exemplifies a troubling shift away from the traditional conservative emphasis on punishment and accountability. The heinous nature of Brom's crimes at the age of 16 should not be mitigated by his age at the time. It is the belief of many conservatives that certain acts are so vile that they irrevocably strip the perpetrator of the privilege to rejoin society.

House Speaker Lisa Demuth's condemnation of the parole decision echoes the conservative stance that public safety and justice for victims' families should be paramount. The new law, according to critics, not only endangers the public by releasing individuals capable of extreme violence but also sends a message that the consequences of such actions can be mitigated over time. This undermines the deterrent effect of severe sentencing.

Furthermore, conservatives argue for a review of policies that prioritize rehabilitation over public safety. The notion that everyone deserves a second chance is noble but should not be applied universally. The conservative approach favors a justice system that maintains public trust by ensuring that those who commit the most heinous crimes face the full weight of their sentences. The reintroduction of a convicted murderer into society, regardless of time served, is seen as a failure to uphold justice, particularly for the victims and their families.

Common Ground

Despite the polarized opinions on David Brom's parole, common ground can be found in the shared desire for a justice system that protects public safety while also offering a path to redemption for those who show genuine change. Both conservatives and progressives can agree on the need for strict conditions and close monitoring of parolees to ensure community safety. There is also a mutual understanding that the severity of a crime should not be forgotten, and that victims and their families deserve justice and closure. The challenge lies in finding a balance that honors these principles while navigating the complexities of individual cases.