Sponsor Advertisement
Megyn Kelly Ends Friendship with Ben Shapiro After Public Critique

Megyn Kelly Ends Friendship with Ben Shapiro After Public Critique

Megyn Kelly has publicly ended her friendship with Ben Shapiro following his criticisms at the AmericaFest conference, citing a conflict over speech and professional autonomy.

At the recent AmericaFest conference in Phoenix, media personality Megyn Kelly announced the termination of her longstanding friendship with Ben Shapiro, co-founder of The Daily Wire. This declaration came in response to Shapiro's public criticism of Kelly during his speech at the same event. Kelly expressed that Shapiro's actions, which she perceived as an attempt to dictate her professional conduct and speech, were unacceptable.

The dispute between Kelly and Shapiro arose when Shapiro accused Kelly of not properly addressing comments made by Candace Owens regarding the assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk. During his address, Shapiro claimed that Kelly downplayed Owens' behavior, which Kelly later refuted in her own statement to the conference attendees.

In her speech on Friday, following Shapiro's remarks, Kelly vehemently objected to Shapiro's approach, stating, "I object to the whole thing. Ben and I, he had the nerve to call me a friend right before he called me a despicable coward for not calling out the people he wants called out." Kelly's rebuttal highlighted a contradiction she saw in Shapiro's expectations, where he seemed to demand both authority over her actions and sympathy from her responses.

Further elaborating on her stance, Kelly accused Shapiro and his affiliates of seeking her intervention in their disputes but rejecting her independence in handling such matters. She emphatically denied any obligation to defend them in the public sphere. "They need me. I have to be their daddy and step in to protect them," Kelly stated, rejecting the presumption that she should act according to their wishes.

Kelly also reminded the audience of her contribution to Shapiro's early career by regularly featuring him on her Fox News Channel shows when he was lesser-known. Despite the recent strains in their relationship, Kelly continued to support Shapiro, citing his recent appearance on her tour and the extensive, favorable introduction she provided.

The broadcaster challenged Shapiro's perceived self-authority within conservative media, questioning his influence and likening his stance to a minor authority figure misjudging their clout. She compared his behavior to that of a middle school authority figure threatening to wield social power.

In addition to addressing the public dispute, Kelly also spoke about her private efforts to mediate between Owens and Erika Kirk, wife of Charlie Kirk. She had been approached by Kirk to help arrange a meeting between Owens and herself, which Kelly agreed to facilitate. Though she remained publicly neutral, Kelly worked behind the scenes to assist in the potential reconciliation.

The confrontation between Kelly and Shapiro has revealed underlying tensions within conservative media circles, touching upon issues of freedom of speech, loyalty, and the dynamics of authority and independence among prominent figures.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The public rift between Megyn Kelly and Ben Shapiro at the AmericaFest conference brings to light issues of speech and accountability that resonate with progressive values. Progressives advocate for responsible discourse and the careful handling of influential platforms, especially when addressing sensitive topics such as the ones that sparked this dispute.

Kelly's approach to the situation, prioritizing her independence and refusing to be swayed by attempts to control her speech, aligns with progressive ideals of empowering individuals to make their own choices. Her role in attempting to mediate between Candace Owens and Erika Kirk further demonstrates a commitment to constructive dialogue and resolution, an approach that progressives often champion.

However, the conflict also highlights systemic issues within media and politics, where public figures sometimes wield their platforms to exert undue influence over others. Progressives would argue for a more collective approach to resolving disputes, one that prioritizes community well-being and ethical standards over personal vendettas.

This incident serves as a reminder that in our pursuit of social justice and equity, we must be conscious of the power dynamics at play and strive to create an environment where dialogue and dissent can occur without resorting to public denunciations that may hinder progressive goals.

Conservative View

The recent fallout between Megyn Kelly and Ben Shapiro underscores a fundamental conservative principle: the importance of individual liberty, particularly in matters of speech and personal conduct. As conservatives, we uphold the right of media figures to express their views without coercion or unwarranted criticism from peers. Kelly's decision to end her friendship with Shapiro after his public critique serves as a reminder that even within conservative circles, it is essential to respect each other's autonomy.

In the context of free markets, Kelly's contributions to Shapiro's early career through her platform highlights the meritocratic nature of media exposure. Her support helped Shapiro gain recognition, emphasizing the conservative value of helping others succeed through opportunity rather than obligation. Shapiro's critique of Kelly, from this perspective, could be seen as an infringement on her professional discretion, which is at odds with the conservative ethos of limited government interference in personal affairs.

Moreover, the incident serves as a case study in the importance of traditional values such as loyalty and respect. While Shapiro may have felt justified in his criticism, the manner in which it was delivered — publicly and without prior discourse — contradicts the conservative understanding of respectful disagreement among allies.

Common Ground

The dispute between Megyn Kelly and Ben Shapiro, while rooted in conservative media, touches upon universal principles that resonate across the political spectrum. Both conservative and progressive perspectives value the freedom of speech and the autonomy of individuals to express their views without fear of undue criticism or control.

At the heart of this issue lies a shared belief in the dignity of personal choice and the importance of respectful disagreement. Both sides can agree on the necessity of maintaining cordial professional relationships and the avoidance of public confrontations that can damage reputations and undercut productive discourse.

Furthermore, the ideals of mentorship and support that Kelly demonstrated towards Shapiro early in his career reflect a common understanding of the importance of providing opportunities for growth and success. The principle of fostering a collaborative environment, where individuals are encouraged to thrive based on merit and mutual respect, is a goal that transcends political affiliations.

In finding common ground, it is possible to advocate for a media landscape where differences in opinion are not only tolerated but are seen as opportunities for learning and evolution. By focusing on constructive engagement and the shared values of independence and respect, a path forward can be forged that emphasizes unity over division.