In a recent decision that has captured the attention of the nation, a Maine court has issued a custody order with far-reaching implications on religious practices. The case, which has been unfolding since December 2024, involves a 12-year-old child, Ava, whose participation in Christian activities has been severely curtailed by the court's ruling.
"Can a mom be prohibited from taking her daughter to church? Absolutely not. But a mother in Maine is currently facing this reality." - Liberty Counsel Tweet
Ava, the daughter of Emily Bickford who has held primary custody since Ava's birth, has been prohibited from attending church services, participating in Christian events, reading the Bible, or maintaining friendships with church members. This contentious custody dispute arose when Ava expressed a desire to be baptized, which led her father, Matt Bradeen, with visitation rights, to seek legal measures to restrict her religious engagement.
The court's order, which extends beyond the walls of the church to include Christian celebrations and holidays such as Christmas and Easter, was presided over by a judge with a history in the ACLU. The restrictions also forbid Ava from engaging with religious literature or discussing her faith with her mother, effectively isolating the child from her spiritual community.
The case reached a critical point when a former sociology professor testified, suggesting that evangelical churches like Calvary Chapel in Portland could cause psychological harm. As a result, Bickford is barred from teaching Ava about Christianity or exposing her to religious practices, and Bradeen has not approved attendance at any church.
Critics of the decision, including Liberty Counsel, argue that the order represents a rare example of a custody decision that restricts a child’s religious upbringing while leaving the parent otherwise deemed fit. Advocates are raising alarms over the implications for religious freedom in family law matters, as well as the emotional and spiritual well-being of the child.
The Maine Supreme Court heard arguments last Thursday to overturn the order, with legal representatives contending that stripping a fit parent of all religious decision-making could amount to discrimination. The justices have reportedly expressed concern about the extent of the order, calling it extreme and without precedent.
Observers note that this case fits into a broader pattern of perceived hostility toward Christian practices, pointing to instances where parents face limitations on sharing their faith with their children. As this case continues to unfold, the Maine Supreme Court's deliberations are being closely watched for their potential impact on parental rights, religious liberty, and the role of judicial discretion in such matters.
