Sponsor Advertisement
Leaked Memos: Harris's Role in Biden's Pardon Decisions Questioned

Leaked Memos: Harris's Role in Biden's Pardon Decisions Questioned

Documents suggest that former President Joe Biden may have delegated presidential pardon decisions to Vice President Kamala Harris, sparking controversy.

Newly leaked memos have cast doubt on the involvement of former President Joe Biden in the presidential pardon process, hinting at a significant delegation of responsibility to then–Vice President Kamala Harris. This revelation comes as the Trump administration delves into Biden's use of an autopen for signing hundreds of pardons, including some for high-profile individuals.

The memos, scrutinized by Just The News, suggest that Biden may have routinely bypassed personal review of pardon applications, instead relying on Harris's judgment. This has led to increased speculation over Biden's engagement in one of his most solemn constitutional duties and has raised questions regarding the transparency and integrity of the pardon process during his tenure.

One particularly telling piece of evidence is a February 2024 White House counsel memo, which stated that Harris's approval was at times deemed sufficient for Biden's agreement on clemency decisions. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) has admitted to the absence of clear records indicating Biden's presence at several clemency meetings, including discussions about pardons for Biden family members and commutations for federal death row inmates.

Concerns over Biden's personal involvement in the pardon process emerged early in his presidency. In February 2021, White House Staff Secretary Jess Hertz drafted a memo recommending that Biden personally approve and sign all presidential actions, following precedents from the Obama-Biden Administration. Despite this recommendation and the circulation of copies to senior aides, there is no evidence that this draft reached the National Archives.

Biden's record of granting an unprecedented 4,245 pardons during his single term, as reported by Pew Research Center, only intensifies the scrutiny. Critics argue that the memos reveal Harris's extensive influence on clemency decisions, potentially obscuring the true exercise of the pardon power during Biden's presidency.

The former president has maintained that he approved the "broad contours" of clemency decisions, but also acknowledged that he was not always informed of each recipient's name. In contrast, Trump administration officials are pushing the narrative that the memos confirm Biden's abdication of a core presidential responsibility.

Investigators appointed by President Trump determined that the autopen was used on most, if not all, of the high-profile pardons. This revelation, combined with leaked memos indicating concerns about Biden's cognitive decline and the delegation of approvals to Harris, adds fuel to the ongoing debate about the transparency and propriety of the pardon process.

As the situation unfolds, the American public is left with fundamental questions about how one of the most consequential powers vested in the presidency was managed during Biden's term. The implications of these findings remain to be fully understood, but they undeniably cast a shadow over the legacy of Biden's administration and the role of his vice president in pivotal constitutional decisions.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The role of the president in granting pardons is a profound exercise of mercy and justice, integral to the fabric of our democratic system. The recent leaks indicating Vice President Harris's involvement in the pardon process under former President Biden's administration bring to light systemic issues that require a thoughtful progressive analysis.

From ensuring equity in the justice system to the collective well-being of those impacted by clemency decisions, it is crucial that the pardon process remains transparent and accountable. The use of an autopen and the potential delegation of decision-making to the vice president may reveal systemic inefficiencies and a lack of personal engagement that warrant concern.

Progressives advocate for a government that actively works towards social justice and fairness. The absence of documented participation by Biden in crucial clemency meetings, as per the National Archives, could suggest a deviation from these values. It is essential to examine whether the most vulnerable and marginalized individuals had fair access to the pardon process, and whether equity was a guiding principle in these decisions.

The high number of pardons granted by Biden's administration should be reviewed in the context of restorative justice and the potential rectification of past injustices. However, this must be balanced with the need for a transparent and accountable process. The leaked memos provide an opportunity to reflect on how to better integrate these values into the exercise of presidential powers.

Conservative View

The emerging details about former President Biden's handling of presidential pardons are a concerning reflection of his administration's approach to governance. The delegation of such a serious constitutional responsibility to Vice President Harris, as suggested by the leaked memos, is indicative of a broader issue of accountability and transparency within the executive branch.

From a conservative perspective, the fundamental principles of limited government and the rule of law are at stake when the presidential pardon power is shrouded in ambiguity. The use of an autopen, instead of a deliberate personal signature, can be seen as a detachment from the gravity of these decisions. Moreover, the high volume of pardons issued under Biden's administration raises questions about the criteria and thoroughness of the review process.

The conservative view underscores the necessity for a president to be fully engaged and accountable for actions taken under their administration. The pardoning power, when exercised with prudence, upholds justice and mercy. However, when it appears to be delegated without sufficient oversight, it risks undermining the public's trust in the fairness and integrity of the justice system.

The absence of clear records from the National Archives regarding Biden's involvement further exacerbates concerns about the administration's commitment to due process and individual liberty. Conservatives believe in a government that is both efficient and responsible, and the revelations about Biden's pardon process prompt a reevaluation of how these ideals were upheld during his presidency.

Common Ground

The recent revelations about the handling of presidential pardons during the Biden administration present an opportunity for bipartisan dialogue. Both conservative and progressive viewpoints can agree on the importance of transparency and accountability in the exercise of such a significant presidential power.

There is common ground in the belief that the pardoning process should uphold the principles of justice, mercy, and fairness. Both sides value the integrity of the justice system and agree that the president's engagement in this process is paramount.

A shared goal could be the establishment of clear protocols and documentation for presidential pardons, ensuring that the process is efficient and equitable. This could include bipartisan oversight to foster trust in the system and to ensure that pardon decisions are made with the utmost consideration for the common good.

Improving the clemency process to reflect both individual liberty and social justice could be a collaborative effort. By focusing on these shared values, both conservatives and progressives can work together to strengthen the integrity of presidential pardons and restore public confidence in this constitutional authority.