⚡ BREAKING NEWS
Sponsor Advertisement
Journalist Arrested Covering Protest Alleges Over-Policing

Journalist Arrested Covering Protest Alleges Over-Policing

A Turning Point USA Frontlines journalist was arrested for alleged jaywalking while covering a protest in Las Vegas, claiming inconsistent enforcement and over-policing. He plans to challenge the charge and file complaints against the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department.

Jonathan Choe, a journalist for Turning Point USA Frontlines, was arrested and detained in Las Vegas over the weekend while reporting on a "No Kings" protest, an incident he described as an experience with "over-policing." Choe stated on Monday, March 31, that he was taken into custody on Saturday, March 28, for a misdemeanor jaywalking charge, a first-time offense for him.

The arrest occurred on Las Vegas Boulevard as Choe was filming from the sidewalk, documenting interactions between activists and Christian individuals, including volunteers from TPAction, during the demonstration. Choe explained his actions leading to the arrest, stating, "I stepped off the sidewalk for a few seconds to avoid bumping into someone in the crowd." He added, "As I was stepping back on the sidewalk, a cop by the name of Officer Schmidt came charging at me and arrested me on the spot."

Choe maintains that he did not hear any warnings from officers to stay on the sidewalk amid the chaotic protest environment, contrary to what Officer Schmidt allegedly claimed. "Instead of giving me a warning, I was taken to jail in handcuffs," Choe wrote in his statement.

Following his arrest, Choe was held in custody for more than 12 hours. During this period, he was placed in a cell with individuals facing more severe charges, including a DUI suspect, an accused domestic abuser, and a homeless person struggling with addiction. He was also required to remove his personal clothing and wear a jail-issued orange jumpsuit. "I spent more than 12 hours in jail with a DUI suspect, accused wife beater, and a homeless drug addict," Choe recounted. "They made me strip down and change into an orange jumpsuit."

Choe was not the sole individual arrested under similar circumstances during the protest. He reported that two elderly men, whom he identified as supporters of the Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement, were also taken into custody for comparable alleged offenses. All three individuals were released on Sunday morning, March 29, and are scheduled to appear before a judge next month.

The journalist has asserted that he possesses video evidence showing other individuals walking in the roadway in front of officers without facing any intervention or citation. This, he argues, demonstrates a significant inconsistency in law enforcement's application of rules during the protest. "The inconsistent enforcement is so obvious and egregious," Choe stated, highlighting his concern about the selective nature of the arrests.

Despite his personal experience, Choe affirmed his general support for law enforcement. However, he also expressed a newfound understanding of what he perceives as excessive police action. "I am still pro-police. But for the first time in my life, I now know what over-policing and a power trip looks like," he wrote, reflecting on the incident's impact on his perspective.

Choe and his attorney are preparing to contest the misdemeanor jaywalking charge in court. Additionally, they intend to file formal complaints against Officer Schmidt and the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. These complaints are planned for submission to both the department's Internal Affairs division and the Citizen Review Board. As part of their legal strategy, they plan to request official body camera footage and police reports pertinent to the arrest. Choe emphasized, "The burden is on the cops to show I was intentionally walking on the roadway and was warned numerous times not to do so."

Furthermore, Choe has indicated his intention to bring the matter to the attention of Nevada Governor Joe Lombardo, a Republican and former Clark County sheriff, seeking guidance on the situation. As of the time of his public statement, Choe had reached out to the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department for comment regarding the arrest but had not yet received a response.

Choe concluded his statement by expressing a broader hope for the police department's future practices. "In the end, I hope Vegas PD uses this as an opportunity to reexamine their enforcement procedures during protests," he said, suggesting a desire for policy review and improvement in handling similar public gatherings.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The arrest of Jonathan Choe, a journalist covering a protest, for an alleged misdemeanor jaywalking offense highlights critical concerns about selective enforcement, press freedom, and the militarization of policing during demonstrations. From a progressive viewpoint, the incident underscores how minor infractions can be disproportionately used to suppress dissent or control narratives, especially when journalists are targeted. The claim that Choe was arrested without warning while others engaged in similar behavior unhindered points to a systemic issue of inconsistent application of the law, which can disproportionately impact certain groups or viewpoints. The experience of being held for over 12 hours alongside individuals facing serious charges for a minor offense raises questions about the humanity and proportionality of the justice system. Protecting journalists' ability to report freely on public events, including protests, is paramount for a healthy democracy and informed citizenry. This incident calls for a closer examination of police training, protocols for managing protests, and accountability mechanisms to prevent power trips or retaliatory actions that undermine civil liberties and the public's right to know.

Conservative View

The arrest of journalist Jonathan Choe raises important questions regarding the balance between maintaining public order and protecting individual liberties, including freedom of the press. From a conservative perspective, law enforcement officers are tasked with upholding the law and ensuring public safety, particularly in dynamic environments like protests. If an individual, regardless of profession, violates a clear statute such as jaywalking, officers have a duty to enforce it. However, the principle of limited government and individual liberty suggests that enforcement should be consistent, proportionate, and not perceived as arbitrary or politically motivated. The claim of inconsistent enforcement, where others allegedly committed similar infractions without consequence, warrants investigation to ensure equal application of the law. Furthermore, the right to report on public events is fundamental to a free society. While journalists are not above the law, their ability to document events without undue interference is crucial. Any action that appears to impede legitimate journalistic activity, particularly for a minor infraction, could be seen as an overreach of state power, even by those who strongly support law enforcement. Due process in court will be essential to determine the facts and ensure justice for all parties involved.

Common Ground

Despite differing perspectives on the specifics of the incident, there are several areas of common ground regarding the arrest of Jonathan Choe. Both conservatives and progressives can agree on the fundamental importance of due process and fair application of the law. If there is evidence of inconsistent enforcement or a lack of proper warning, a thorough investigation is warranted to ensure accountability and maintain public trust in law enforcement. There is also shared value in protecting the ability of journalists to report on public events without undue interference, as a free press is vital for an informed citizenry. Transparency from law enforcement, including the release of body camera footage and police reports, is crucial for establishing facts and building confidence. Ultimately, all sides can agree that police procedures during protests should be clear, consistently applied, and designed to balance public safety with the protection of constitutional rights, including freedom of assembly and speech.