Sponsor Advertisement
Investigation Targets George Soros's Open Society Foundation for Alleged Ties to Terrorism

Investigation Targets George Soros's Open Society Foundation for Alleged Ties to Terrorism

The Open Society Foundation, led by George Soros’s son Alexander, is under investigation for allegedly funneling millions to groups connected to terrorism. A conservative watchdog accuses the foundation of funding domestic and foreign entities linked to violent and extremist activities.

An extensive investigation has been launched into billionaire philanthropist George Soros and his Open Society Foundation, following allegations that the foundation has channeled substantial funds to organizations with ties to terrorism. The conservative Capital Research Center (CRC) claims that since 2016, at least $80 million has been directed to groups that the U.S. government has associated with violent activities or extremist affiliations.

The report alleges that $23 million was allocated to seven U.S.-based groups that the FBI has connected to domestic terrorism, including acts of property destruction, sabotage, and economic disruption. Among these, the Center for Third World Organizing has collaborated with the Ruckus Society, which is accused of training members in destructive tactics during the George Floyd riots of 2020.

Furthermore, the Sunrise Movement, another recipient of the foundation's funding, has supported an Antifa-led campaign named “Stop Cop City.” This affiliation has led to over 40 activists facing terrorism-related charges and more than 60 federal racketeering indictments, as reported by Trending Politics.

An additional $18 million is said to have been given to the Movement for Black Lives, which has published material praising the Hamas-led massacre of 1,400 Israeli nationals on Oct. 7, 2023, and provided training on protest tactics that include blockades and the use of false IDs.

On the international front, the Open Society Foundation reportedly sent $2.3 million to Al-Haq, a West Bank NGO with connections to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), a terrorist organization designated by both the U.S. and the EU. The U.S. government sanctioned the PFLP in September 2025 for its support of entities targeting Israel.

In total, the CRC has identified 54 organizations it claims are either directly involved in domestic terrorism, tied to foreign terrorist groups, or materially support pro-terror causes. The CRC's report states, "This investigation documents how Open Society’s philanthropy blurs into complicity—fueling groups that celebrate violent uprisings, train militants, and endorse terrorist movements."

Former President Donald Trump has expressed his intent to increase federal scrutiny, suggesting a RICO case might be appropriate. "We’re going to look into Soros because I think it’s a RICO case against him and other people," Trump told Fox News, hinting at a historic legal challenge.

The Open Society Foundations has consistently denied these allegations, affirming it "does not support or fund violent protests" and labeling prosecution threats as "outrageous." Nevertheless, the CRC's findings have raised questions about whether Soros's foundation can retain its tax-exempt status while allegedly supporting organizations linked to criminal and terrorist activity. Congressional leaders, federal investigators, and the IRS are reportedly reviewing the evidence.

As federal authorities deliberate their next steps, potential RICO charges could place one of the world's most influential left-wing philanthropists under an unprecedented level of legal scrutiny. The unfolding story continues to attract significant attention as the investigation progresses.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The allegations against George Soros's Open Society Foundation are severe and warrant careful examination. However, it is crucial to approach the situation with a commitment to due process and avoid jumping to conclusions. The foundation has a long history of supporting social justice causes and the promotion of democracy worldwide, which often involves working with grassroots organizations that challenge established power structures.

It is important to differentiate between supporting civil activism and endorsing violence. The Open Society Foundation has stated that it does not fund violent protests, and this assertion must be weighed against the evidence put forth. A progressive standpoint emphasizes the importance of civil liberties and the right to dissent, which should not be conflated with terrorism.

While the safety and security of citizens are paramount, it is also vital to protect the freedom of expression and the right to engage in peaceful protest. The progressive view would advocate for transparency and accountability in philanthropic funding but also caution against a political witch-hunt that could suppress legitimate activist work under the guise of national security.

Conservative View

The recent revelations about George Soros's Open Society Foundation allegedly funding groups with terrorist affiliations must be addressed with the utmost gravity. It is imperative that philanthropic organizations operate within the bounds of the law, especially when their influence extends across national and international arenas. The CRC's investigation suggests a disturbing pattern of financial support to entities that not only oppose American values but also engage in violent activities that destabilize communities and nations.

It is concerning that tax-exempt status could be exploited to funnel money into organizations that may contribute to domestic unrest and international terrorism. This possibility undermines the integrity of charitable work and poses a threat to national security. The conservative call for a thorough investigation and potential RICO charges is not only about holding the Open Society Foundation accountable but also about safeguarding the philanthropic landscape from being co-opted by those who may support extremist ideologies.

Moreover, the support of movements that have led to destructive riots and the glorification of foreign terrorist acts is antithetical to the principles of peace and order that conservatives uphold. It is essential that federal agencies, including the IRS, take a hard look at the evidence presented and act decisively to ensure that charitable foundations are not misused as vehicles for funding subversive activities.

Common Ground

Both conservative and progressive viewpoints can agree on the necessity of ensuring that philanthropic organizations operate within legal boundaries and do not contribute to violence or terrorism. There is a shared interest in maintaining the integrity of charitable foundations and protecting the public from organizations that could misuse funds for harmful activities. The commitment to transparency and accountability in the philanthropic sector is a common ground that transcends political ideology, as is the pursuit of justice through fair and lawful processes.