Sponsor Advertisement
HHS Reverts Levine Portrait Name Amid Policy Review

HHS Reverts Levine Portrait Name Amid Policy Review

HHS has revised the official portrait name of Admiral Richard Levine to reflect his birth name, sparking diverse reactions and a broader policy debate.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) recently updated the official portrait of Admiral Richard Levine, the former Biden administration assistant secretary for health. The alteration, which changed the displayed name from Rachel to Richard, coincided with the federal government shutdown and has since elicited a spectrum of public and political responses.

Adrian Shanker, a spokesperson for Levine and a former deputy assistant secretary for health policy under the Biden administration, expressed disapproval of the change, branding it as indicative of pettiness and bigotry. Shanker conveyed to NPR his concerns about the implications of the update on the current HHS leadership's reputation.

Levine, who transitioned in 2011 and is recognized for serving as both assistant secretary for health and a four-star admiral in the U.S. Public Health Service, adopted female pronouns during his tenure and was an advocate for transgender health interventions. The National Women's History Museum notes that Levine's portraits in the Humphrey Building formerly displayed his legal female name.

Defending the portrait name revision, HHS officials under President Donald Trump's administration have justified the action as an alignment with "biological reality," a move representative of broader efforts to ensure HHS communications reflect evidence-based health information. Andrew Nixon, an HHS spokesperson, underscored the department's commitment to revising policies enacted by Levine, which critics argue pose long-term risks.

Levine's role in promoting treatments such as puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and gender-related surgeries for minors has been a point of contention, with some institutions scaling back such interventions amidst debates on their safety and efficacy.

The portrait change has not escaped political spotlight, with Rep. Becca Balint (D-VT) critiquing the decision as a perpetuation of cultural conflicts. Balint, in a video on social media, lamented the reversion to Levine's birth name as an act driven by insecurity.

Amidst these differing opinions, the current assistant secretary for health, Admiral Brian Christine, along with HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., remains focused on reinforcing public trust and advancing transparent health policy communications.

Shanker relayed that despite opting not to comment directly, Levine remains unshaken in the belief that the name change does not diminish his professional contributions as a dedicated public servant. This HHS update is part of a series of modifications across federal offices that aim to revise records from the previous administration, reflecting an ongoing review of policies and communications.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The revision of Admiral Richard Levine's portrait by the HHS has elicited concern from progressive circles, which view the act as a potential setback for transgender rights and representation. Progressives emphasize the importance of respecting individual identity and the harmful effects that misnaming or "deadnaming" can have on transgender individuals' dignity and mental health.

From a progressive standpoint, the name change could be perceived as undermining the social recognition and acceptance that transgender individuals seek and deserve. It raises concerns about the erasure of transgender history and accomplishments, given Admiral Levine's notable position as a high-ranking transgender official in the Biden administration.

Moreover, progressives are likely to argue for the continuation of healthcare policies that support transgender individuals, including access to gender-affirming treatments. They argue that such healthcare is vital for the well-being of transgender people and should be based on the latest medical consensus, which recognizes the benefits of these interventions.

The emphasis on social justice and equity drives the progressive critique of the portrait update, highlighting how government actions can reflect broader societal attitudes towards marginalized communities. Progressives call for a compassionate and inclusive approach to health policy that honors individuals' lived experiences and identities.

In summary, the progressive viewpoint centers on advocating for the rights and recognition of transgender individuals within the healthcare system, promoting equity and inclusion, and opposing actions that could be construed as discriminatory or regressive.

Conservative View

The Department of Health and Human Services' decision to update Admiral Richard Levine's portrait to reflect his birth name can be viewed through a conservative lens as a restoration of clarity and scientific rigor in public health policy. This move aligns with conservative principles favoring objective, evidence-based approaches to governance and a recognition of biological facts in policy-making.

From a conservative perspective, the emphasis on biological reality over subjective criteria is essential for maintaining the integrity of public health records and communications. It is argued that the change is not a personal affront but a necessary correction to ensure that official materials accurately represent the truth, which is a cornerstone of effective governance.

By focusing on reversing policies that conservatives deem harmful, the Trump administration is demonstrating a commitment to individual liberty by safeguarding parental rights and the well-being of minors. The conservative viewpoint often highlights the importance of rigorous scientific analysis and the potential risks of interventions such as puberty blockers and gender-related surgeries, especially for minors.

Conservatives may also stress the significance of preserving historical accuracy and transparency in government records. This action by the HHS can be seen as part of a broader effort to review and rectify policies implemented by the previous administration that are believed to conflict with these values.

In conclusion, the conservative stance on this matter underscores the need for a health policy that prioritizes empirical evidence and respects individual freedoms, while ensuring that government actions reflect the truth and protect the most vulnerable members of society.

Common Ground

Despite differing opinions on the HHS portrait update of Admiral Richard Levine, common ground can be found in the shared goal of ensuring the health and well-being of all Americans, including the transgender community. Both conservative and progressive viewpoints value the importance of accurate health information and the role of public servants in promoting public health.

Both sides may agree on the necessity of transparency and historical accuracy in government records. Furthermore, there is a shared understanding of the need for respectful discourse and the avoidance of personal attacks in policy discussions.

Finding common ground involves recognizing the validity of different perspectives on identity and health policy, while working collaboratively to create an environment where scientific evidence and individual dignity are both respected. It is through this balanced approach that solutions addressing the concerns of all stakeholders can be developed.