Sponsor Advertisement
Gen Z's Conservative Hopeful Under Scrutiny Amid RNC Initiative Failure

Gen Z's Conservative Hopeful Under Scrutiny Amid RNC Initiative Failure

Brilyn Hollyhand, once seen as a rising star among conservative youth, faces criticism over the ineffectiveness of the RNC Youth Advisory Council he co-chaired, as well as questions about his past accolades and policy positions.

The political journey of Brilyn Hollyhand, often touted as the successor to the late conservative activist Charlie Kirk, has been marked by a mixture of anticipation and controversy. Hollyhand first emerged on the political scene in early 2023, when he approached then-Republican National Committee Chair Ronna McDaniel with a proposal: to create a youth advisory council aimed at amplifying the voices of young conservatives and mobilizing Gen Z voters for the 2024 election.

McDaniel, recognizing the potential for engaging a new generation of voters, gave the green light, and the RNC Youth Advisory Council came to life by mid-2023, with Hollyhand and C.J. Pearson at the helm. The mission was clear-cut: to organize and involve young conservatives in the political discourse, providing them with a platform ahead of Donald Trump’s anticipated presidential campaign.

Despite the RNC's backing, which included funding and access to its extensive network, Rift News reported that Hollyhand's initiative began to falter by the end of 2023. The council's presence was hardly felt, with no significant organizing efforts or outreach campaigns visible, especially on college campuses where their counterparts on the left were gaining traction through active voter registration drives and issue-based organizing.

Hollyhand’s defense of the council's achievements centered around an online debate event that reportedly attracted over a million views. Yet, this metric fell short of demonstrating any real impact on voter engagement or turnout, leaving many to question the substance behind the figures.

The council's inefficacy came to a head in December 2023 when several members, including Republican strategist Caroline Wren, resigned in protest. Their departure was punctuated by a public letter slamming the RNC for the council's lack of direction and accusing it of being a smokescreen for fundraising efforts.

Adding to the turmoil, Hollyhand's defense of McDaniel's leadership and the RNC's controversial "Bank Your Vote" campaign, which focused on deep-blue states rather than swing states, drew ire from prominent conservative figures such as Tyler Bowyer of Turning Point Action.

In the backdrop of these organizational challenges were questions about Hollyhand's credibility. Notably, his receipt of the John Lewis Youth Leadership Award from Alabama's Secretary of State, John Merrill, raised eyebrows, given the campaign donations from Hollyhand's grandfather and the subsequent extramarital scandal involving Merrill.

Moreover, rifts began to emerge between Hollyhand's stances and the core tenets of the America First movement. His advocacy for increased legal immigration and his indecision on whether AIPAC should register under FARA, as highlighted on social media, signaled a departure from the movement's focus on sovereignty and accountability.

As the Republican Party reckons with a generational shift, the narrative surrounding Brilyn Hollyhand serves as a cautionary tale. The grassroots conservative base is calling for leaders who not only espouse their values but also demonstrate tangible results and a commitment to their principles. Hollyhand's tenure as co-chair, marred by unmet expectations and policy misalignments, reflects the growing disconnect between establishment endorsements and effective activism.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The situation surrounding Brilyn Hollyhand and the RNC Youth Advisory Council offers a progressive critique of modern conservative leadership’s approach to youth engagement and political organization. Progressives would argue that the failure of the council to make an impact despite having access to significant resources is indicative of systemic issues within the conservative movement's approach to youth outreach – issues that revolve around top-down structures lacking genuine grassroots involvement.

Moreover, the allegations of using the Youth Advisory Council as a façade for fundraising tactics resonate with progressive concerns over the influence of money in politics. This situation underscores the need for transparency and accountability in political initiatives, particularly when attempting to engage younger generations who are often more attuned to social justice and authenticity.

Additionally, Hollyhand’s positions on immigration and foreign policy present an opportunity for progressives to advocate for inclusive policies and a more nuanced understanding of global dynamics. Progressives would emphasize the importance of embracing America's diversity and the need for fair representation of all communities in policy discussions.

Conservative View

From a conservative perspective, the unraveling of the RNC Youth Advisory Council under Brilyn Hollyhand represents a missed opportunity to harness the energy of young conservatives, particularly ahead of the crucial 2024 elections. The essence of conservative thought emphasizes not just the articulation of values but their practical application in policy and organizational success. The council's failure to engage and mobilize young voters undermines the Republican Party's ability to compete in the ideological marketplace, where left-leaning organizations are making measurable advances.

Furthermore, the controversy surrounding Hollyhand's questionable award and his reported advocacy for policies contrary to America First principles illustrates a broader concern about the integrity and direction of conservative leadership. It is this sort of 'résumé conservatism' – prioritizing appearances and connections over substance and results – that erodes trust and dilutes the potency of the conservative message.

For conservatives, the path forward demands a recommitment to grassroots efforts that embody the principles of limited government, individual liberty, and national sovereignty. The future of conservatism relies on cultivating leaders who not only understand these ideals but who also have the strategic acumen to implement them effectively across various platforms, particularly among the youth.

Common Ground

Despite the divergent views on Brilyn Hollyhand's role within the conservative movement, there are areas of common ground that can be found in the underlying desire for effective leadership and genuine engagement with young voters. Both conservative and progressive viewpoints acknowledge the importance of youth involvement in the political process and the need for leaders to deliver on their promises.

There is also shared agreement on the principle of accountability. Leaders, regardless of their political affiliation, should be held to high standards of transparency and effectiveness. This includes ensuring that initiatives like the Youth Advisory Council are not mere vehicles for fundraising or self-promotion, but rather tools for meaningful change and voter engagement.

Ultimately, both sides can concur that the future of politics rests on the shoulders of the next generation. Cultivating leaders who can bridge political divides and inspire action is essential for the health of our democracy. As such, there is a shared responsibility to mentor and support young individuals who possess the integrity and drive to advance the public good.