⚡ BREAKING NEWS
Sponsor Advertisement
Former Iranian Political Prisoner Reveals Iran's Long-standing 'Cold War' with the U.S.
America and Iran poised in a standoff

Former Iranian Political Prisoner Reveals Iran's Long-standing 'Cold War' with the U.S.

Kian Tajbakhsh, a former Iranian political prisoner, revealed on CNN that Iran has considered itself at war with the U.S. since 1979. This statement coincides with ongoing U.S.-Israeli military operations against Iran.

In a revealing CNN panel discussion last week, Kian Tajbakhsh, an Iranian-American who was detained during the 2009 Green Revolution in Iran, provided a chilling account of Iran's adversarial stance towards the United States. Tajbakhsh's comments come amid escalating military actions by American and Israeli forces against the Tehran regime.

Speaking on "CNN NewsNight" on Thursday, Tajbakhsh offered a glimpse into the Iranian government's mindset, which has long viewed its relationship with the U.S. as confrontational. His remarks shed new light on the decades-long tension between Iran and the West, suggesting that the current hostilities are part of a broader historical conflict.

"I don’t think it’s right to say that President Trump has started a war with Iran," Tajbakhsh stated during the broadcast. "I think President Trump wants to finish a war that Iran started in 1979, 47 years ago." He recalled a conversation from either 2003 or 2004 with a senior official at the Iranian foreign ministry who made it clear that the Iranian government considered itself at war with the United States.

"He said, 'We in this building,'" Tajbakhsh recounted, indicating that the official was referring to the foreign ministry and, by extension, the entire Iranian regime. "'We believe we are at war with the United States.'" The official described the nature of the conflict at the time as a "cold war," but unequivocally a war nonetheless.

The panel, which included former CNN Global Affairs Correspondent Elise Labott and Foreign Policy Editor-in-Chief Ravi Agrawal, reacted immediately to Tajbakhsh's testimony. Labott expressed her belief that a military confrontation between the U.S. and Iran was inevitable, while also conveying her discomfort with the current situation and messaging.

The discussion followed the initiation of Operation Epic Fury, announced by President Donald Trump on Truth Social. The operation involves coordinated strikes by the U.S. military and the Israeli Defense Forces against Iran, resulting in the death of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

The Trump administration has maintained a confrontational approach towards Iran, with Operation Epic Fury intensifying the campaign. The Center for Strategic and International Studies reported that Trump outlined four objectives for the operation: preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, destroying its missile arsenal and production sites, degrading its proxy networks, and annihilating its navy.

On January 11, aboard Air Force One, Trump warned the Iranian regime that it was beginning to cross a "red line" with its attacks on protesters. A human rights group confirmed the death of nearly 6,900 protesters at the hands of the Iranian regime, according to a BBC report.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

While acknowledging the complexities of the U.S.-Iran relationship, progressives express concern over the potential consequences of escalating military engagements like Operation Epic Fury. The death of Ayatollah Khamenei, while significant, may lead to further destabilization in the region and provoke retaliatory actions from Iran and its proxies.

Progressives advocate for diplomatic solutions and engagement with international partners to address the multifaceted issues surrounding Iran's nuclear program and regional influence. They argue that military action should be a last resort and emphasize the importance of upholding human rights, including the protection of protesters and civilians.

The progressive viewpoint emphasizes the need for a nuanced approach that considers the long-term implications of military strikes and the potential for unforeseen consequences that could exacerbate tensions and lead to wider conflict.

Conservative View

The revelations by Kian Tajbakhsh on CNN underscore a reality that many conservatives have long acknowledged: Iran has been an adversary of the United States since the Islamic Revolution of 1979. The regime's declaration of a 'cold war' against America is a confirmation of their long-standing hostility and justifies the current administration's robust response.

Operation Epic Fury, as outlined by President Trump, is a necessary measure to neutralize the threat posed by Iran's nuclear ambitions, missile program, proxy warfare, and naval capabilities. The death of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei marks a significant blow to the regime and demonstrates the effectiveness of the operation.

The conservative policy stance is clear: the United States must take decisive action to protect its interests and allies, particularly Israel, from the Iranian threat. The Trump administration's proactive measures are seen as a continuation of a defensive posture necessitated by Iran's aggressive actions, including its crackdown on protesters and pursuit of nuclear capabilities.

Common Ground

Both conservative and progressive viewpoints recognize the importance of addressing the threat posed by Iran's nuclear ambitions and regional aggression. There is a shared understanding that the safety of the United States and its allies, particularly Israel, is paramount. Agreement may be found in the necessity of preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons and the need to support the Iranian people in their pursuit of human rights and democratic reforms.