Sponsor Advertisement
Ex-Judge Accused of Shielding Violent Gang Member in New Mexico

Ex-Judge Accused of Shielding Violent Gang Member in New Mexico

Former New Mexico judge Joel Cano allegedly destroyed evidence to protect a Tren de Aragua gang member, leading to his resignation and a lifetime judicial ban.

Attorney General Pam Bondi has brought to light alarming behavior by former New Mexico judge Joel Cano, who reportedly took extreme measures to protect a violent gang member from the Tren de Aragua (TDA). The revelations surfaced following Cano's resignation and subsequent lifetime prohibition from occupying any judicial position in New Mexico.

The case unfolded when it was revealed that Cano had obstructed justice by destroying a cell phone linked to a TDA gang member named Ortega-Lopez. In a Fox News interview, Bondi highlighted that Cano personally shattered the phone, which held gruesome images, and disposed of it in a dumpster to eliminate evidence. Cano was formally charged with obstruction for his actions.

The already grim situation took a more sinister turn upon discovery that Cano's wife, Nancy Cano, was also implicated in destroying evidence. According to reports from Trending Politics, Ortega-Lopez, who had been staying at the Cano family residence, distributed photos of decapitated victims through text messages. The phone, Bondi emphasized, contained horrific evidence, including images of two beheaded individuals.

The involvement of the Cano family with Ortega-Lopez set off alarm bells, especially given the Tren de Aragua gang's expanding presence in the United States. Bondi expressed her disdain, noting that Ortega-Lopez, a violent criminal with access to assault rifles used at a shooting range with other suspected gang members, is not the type of individual welcomed in the U.S. The weapons, reportedly belonging to the Cano family's daughter, were found in the home.

The scandal over Cano's behavior began to unfold after Ortega-Lopez's arrest by Homeland Security on February 28. The raid targeted a property owned by Nancy Cano, where Ortega-Lopez and other illegal immigrants were staying. Court documents disclosed that Ortega-Lopez had entered the U.S. illegally in December 2023 and had been permitted to live in a "casita" behind the Cano family's home after performing some contract work.

Federal authorities seized four firearms from the property, with evidence indicating that Ortega-Lopez had manipulated and discharged firearms belonging to April Cano, the judge's daughter. This case provoked questions regarding the degree to which the Cano family may have facilitated the criminal undertakings of Ortega-Lopez.

In response to the scandal, Judge Cano resigned in March, departing with a vague message to his fellow judges. The New Mexico Supreme Court acted swiftly, enforcing a lifetime ban on Cano, barring him from ever serving in a judicial capacity again.

The Tren de Aragua gang, often likened to MS-13 for its viciousness, is now considered a significant threat to U.S. national security by Homeland Security. The gang's activities have proliferated nationwide, with operations detected in cities such as Los Angeles and Aurora, Colorado.

The case also scrutinized the initial release of Ortega-Lopez by a U.S. magistrate judge who questioned whether Cano would have allowed such a risky individual to reside in his home. Nevertheless, federal prosecutors are now seeking to overturn this decision, pointing to compelling evidence of Ortega-Lopez's criminal conduct and the danger he represents to the community.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The alarming revelations involving former judge Joel Cano's alleged efforts to protect a gang member from the Tren de Aragua raise significant questions about the fairness and accountability of our judicial system. While it's essential to condemn any act of obstruction of justice, we must also consider the broader social context that enables such situations.

Our focus must extend beyond punitive measures to understanding the factors that contribute to the proliferation of gangs like TDA. Addressing root causes, such as economic disparities and social exclusion, is critical for long-term solutions. Furthermore, while ensuring public safety is paramount, our response to immigration must be humane and just. The case of Ortega-Lopez living in the Cano family's "casita" after performing contract work reflects the complex realities faced by many immigrants.

This incident should also spark a dialogue on the necessity of comprehensive immigration reform that balances the enforcement of laws with the protection of human rights. It is equally important to ensure that our legal system is transparent and that officials are held accountable to prevent such abuses of power. As we seek justice in this case, we must also strive for a more equitable society that addresses the underlying issues contributing to these challenges.

Conservative View

The egregious actions of former New Mexico judge Joel Cano exemplify a disturbing breach of trust and law, as he stands accused of protecting a known criminal from the Tren de Aragua gang. This situation raises critical concerns about the integrity of our judicial system and the enforcement of our immigration laws. It is imperative that we hold our public officials to the highest standards, especially when they are tasked with upholding the law.

The leniency initially shown by a U.S. magistrate judge in releasing Ortega-Lopez underscores a broader issue with our current immigration enforcement. It's essential to prioritize the safety of American citizens and ensure that violent criminals, especially those involved with dangerous gangs like TDA, are not allowed to exploit our system. This case also points to the need for stricter immigration policies and better vetting processes to prevent individuals with nefarious intentions from entering the country.

Moreover, the Cano family's apparent complicity in harboring and enabling Ortega-Lopez's activities is a stark reminder of the risks posed by those who aid and abet illegal immigrants engaged in criminal actions. The swift response by the New Mexico Supreme Court in banning Cano from the judiciary is commendable, yet this incident should prompt a thorough review of how such oversights occur within our legal framework. It is crucial that law enforcement agencies work collaboratively to dismantle these gang networks and prevent the spread of their violent influence across the nation.

Common Ground

Despite differing perspectives on the broader implications of the case involving Joel Cano and Ortega-Lopez, there is consensus on several key points. Both sides agree that the justice system must uphold the highest standards of integrity and that any form of corruption or misuse of power is unacceptable. There's also shared recognition of the threat posed by gangs like Tren de Aragua to community safety and national security.

Furthermore, there's a mutual understanding of the importance of holding public officials accountable for their actions. Ensuring that individuals in positions of power do not abuse their authority is a principle that transcends political divides. Ultimately, the common goal is to maintain a society where laws are respected, communities are safe, and justice is served fairly and impartially.