Sponsor Advertisement
Emails Suggest White House-DOJ Coordination Before Trump Raid

Emails Suggest White House-DOJ Coordination Before Trump Raid

New emails indicate possible coordination between the Biden White House and DOJ prior to the FBI's raid on President Trump's residence, challenging previous denials.

Documents that have recently come to light suggest there may have been coordination between the White House under President Joe Biden and the Department of Justice (DOJ) before the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) conducted a raid on President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago home. This new evidence appears to contradict earlier claims of independence made by the involved parties and has sparked renewed controversy.

Chad Mizelle, former Chief of Staff to Attorney General Pam Bondi, disclosed to the New York Post that he reviewed emails which detailed interactions among the Biden White House Counsel's Office, the DOJ under then-Attorney General Merrick Garland, and the National Archives about documents at Mar-a-Lago months before the raid on August 8, 2022. Mizelle stated, "We have concrete evidence that Biden’s White House was very much involved in the most unprecedented, unjust and improper law enforcement act in the history of our country."

The emails reportedly show ongoing communication between the White House, DOJ, and National Archives until a pivotal moment when someone suggested taking the discussion 'offline,' after which the correspondence ceased. Although the New York Post has not independently reviewed the documents, a source familiar with the emails confirmed their existence.

These findings come alongside internal FBI and DOJ communications publicized by Senator Chuck Grassley, indicating there was significant opposition to the Mar-a-Lago raid within the FBI. Several officials believed there was insufficient probable cause, but their concerns were overruled by DOJ leadership and then special counsel Jack Smith's team. Ultimately, Garland authorized the raid, which led to the seizure of classified documents and President Trump's indictment in June 2023 — an indictment that collapsed in July 2024 following a federal judge's ruling against Smith's appointment.

The existence of these emails directly challenges the DOJ's policy of maintaining strict independence from the White House. A July 2021 memo by Garland explicitly stated that the Justice Department would refrain from advising the White House on pending or contemplated investigations, barring exceptional circumstances. The Biden administration has consistently maintained the president was unaware of the operation, with former press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre declining to respond to inquiries following the raid.

President Trump's legal representatives had contended that the White House was involved behind the scenes, a claim later supported by evidence and statements from then Acting Archivist Debra Steidel Wall. The National Archives officially referred the case to the DOJ in February 2022, and a criminal investigation was authorized by Garland in March of the same year. Smith's team described White House involvement as "formal and limited," but the recently disclosed emails have cast doubt on that assertion.

In a tweet dated December 17, 2025, attorney Jay Sekulow unveiled correspondence indicating that FBI agents and DOJ lawyers from the Biden Administration acknowledged a lack of probable cause but proceeded with the raid regardless. This adds another layer to the ongoing controversy surrounding the actions taken against President Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The allegations of coordination between the Biden White House and the DOJ prior to the raid on President Trump's Mar-a-Lago home raise several concerns from a progressive standpoint. The core issue here is the integrity of our democratic institutions and the trust that citizens place in them.

From the perspective of social justice and equity, it is imperative that all individuals, regardless of their status or political affiliation, are subject to the same legal standards. Any deviation from this principle could lead to a perception of bias and erode public confidence in the justice system.

Environmental and systemic issues may not be directly implicated in this case, but the broader implications of government transparency and accountability certainly are. Progressives emphasize the importance of a government that operates in the best interests of all its citizens, and this includes ensuring that law enforcement actions are not influenced by partisan politics.

It is also essential to advocate for robust checks and balances within the government. If the DOJ has been influenced by the White House in a manner contrary to established policy, it is the responsibility of other branches and independent institutions to address and rectify such overreach.

Furthermore, collective well-being relies on the assurance that our leaders act ethically and within the framework of the law. The potential misuse of power for political purposes must be scrutinized and, if necessary, remedied through community and governmental solutions.

Conservative View

The recent revelations regarding the coordination between the Biden White House and the Department of Justice before the raid on President Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate are deeply troubling. From a conservative perspective, this incident undermines the essential principle of equal justice under the law and threatens the integrity of our institutions.

The alleged involvement of the White House in what should be an independent DOJ operation reflects a departure from limited government and the traditional separation of powers. Such actions, if proven true, could set a dangerous precedent where political considerations overshadow the rule of law. It is crucial to maintain an unbiased and apolitical justice system, free from the influence of other branches of government.

Moreover, this situation raises concerns about transparency and accountability within the current administration. It is a fundamental conservative value that government officials be held to their word and policy declarations, as in Attorney General Garland's memo concerning the DOJ's independence from the White House. The public deserves honesty and adherence to declared policies, especially when it comes to matters with significant political implications.

Finally, the principle of personal responsibility is at stake. If the Biden administration has indeed engaged in a political maneuver against President Trump, those involved must be held accountable for their actions. Ensuring that no individual or entity is above the law is paramount to preserving a free and fair society.

Common Ground

In the wake of the revealed emails suggesting coordination between the Biden White House and the DOJ before the FBI's raid on President Trump's home, individuals across the political spectrum can agree on the importance of upholding the rule of law and maintaining the independence of our judicial system.

Both conservatives and progressives can find common ground in the belief that transparency and accountability within all branches of government are crucial to a functioning democracy. There is a shared value in ensuring that no government entity is above the law and that thorough investigations are conducted when there are allegations of misconduct.

Moreover, there is a mutual interest in protecting the integrity of our institutions. Both sides value a justice system that operates without bias and treats all citizens equally. This incident presents an opportunity for bipartisan support for policies and practices that reinforce the separation of powers and prevent undue influence over law enforcement agencies.

Finding solutions that restore public trust and reinforce the impartiality of our justice system are goals that resonate with both conservative and progressive ideals. Working together to establish clear guidelines and oversight mechanisms can help prevent future instances of potential overreach or politicization of justice.