Sponsor Advertisement
DOJ Probes Biden’s Use of AutoPen in Pardon Review

DOJ Probes Biden’s Use of AutoPen in Pardon Review

The Trump DOJ is investigating pardons and commutations by former President Biden, scrutinizing the use of an AutoPen and clemency for Hunter Biden.

The Department of Justice under President Donald Trump has initiated a review of presidential clemency actions taken by former President Joe Biden during the last weeks of his administration. The investigation, led by Pardon Attorney Ed Martin, is focusing on the legitimacy of Biden's mental condition and the use of an AutoPen for signing official documents, including pardons and commutations.

Officials have confirmed the examination of a list of individuals who received clemency from Biden, though the exact cases under review remain undisclosed. The probe is said to particularly concentrate on preemptive pardons issued to Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, as well as sentence commutations for over 35 death row inmates to life imprisonment.

The DOJ's review comes in the wake of questions raised about the former president's cognitive state and the procedural aspects of his clemency decisions. Biden had granted over 1,500 pardons and commutations, a record described by the White House at the time as the largest single-day clemency order in U.S. history. Among those pardoned were individuals convicted of major financial crimes, which led to criticism from political adversaries and legal analysts.

The use of the AutoPen, a device that replicates the president's signature, has been a particular point of contention. Critics argue that its use casts doubt on Biden's direct involvement in the clemency process. However, White House officials during Biden's term maintained that the AutoPen was deployed within legal norms and with the president's explicit consent.

Following Trump's return to the presidency after the 2024 election, Republican legislators have advocated for a thorough examination of Biden's final executive actions, with the clemency orders standing out as a key focus for inquiry. Requests for related documentation and internal communications have been made, though the DOJ has not confirmed its cooperation with these requests.

Presently, the investigation does not involve any criminal charges or formal accusations of misconduct. It is being characterized as an internal review by the Office of the Pardon Attorney, aiming to determine the adherence to proper procedures and Biden's capacity to lawfully utilize presidential clemency powers.

Comparisons with previous administrations' clemency actions are being made to ascertain any substantial deviations. There have been no announcements from the Trump administration regarding reversing or revoking any of the pardons. Legal experts suggest the outcome of this review may set a precedent for future standards of clemency and presidential conduct.

The DOJ has not indicated a completion timeline for the review or confirmed whether its findings will be publicly disclosed.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The DOJ's review of Biden's clemency actions, particularly its focus on the use of an AutoPen, is a matter of concern for progressives who value social justice and equity. The clemency power is a vital tool for correcting systemic injustices and providing relief to those disproportionately affected by the criminal justice system. The extensive list of commutations, including those for death row inmates, reflects an effort toward a more humane and equitable application of justice.

The investigation must be careful not to undermine the legitimate use of presidential clemency, which can serve as a corrective measure in a system fraught with disparities. Progressives will watch closely to ensure that the review does not become a politically motivated endeavor that detracts from the collective wellbeing and overshadows the positive impacts of Biden's clemency actions.

While the use of an AutoPen raises procedural questions, it is essential to focus on the substance of the clemency decisions and their alignment with principles of justice and rehabilitation. The review should not distract from the systemic changes needed to address the root causes of mass incarceration and the death penalty.

Conservative View

The investigation into former President Biden's use of an AutoPen for clemency grants by the Trump DOJ is a crucial step in upholding the integrity of the presidential pardon power. The conservative principle of limited government mandates that executive authority is exercised with transparency and accountability. The sheer volume of pardons and commutations issued by Biden, coupled with concerns about his mental fitness, warrant a thorough evaluation to ensure that all actions were within the bounds of the law.

The preemptive pardons, particularly those of Hunter Biden, raise questions about potential conflicts of interest and the undermining of traditional values of justice. Conservatives emphasize the importance of personal responsibility and the rule of law. Any deviation from established legal protocols in the clemency process, especially for financial crimes, undermines economic efficiency by potentially excusing fraudulent behavior that harms taxpayers.

This review serves as an opportunity to restore confidence in the clemency process and ensure it is not subject to abuse. It underscores the conservative commitment to a government that functions with integrity and serves the people with fairness and respect for the constitution.

Common Ground

Both conservative and progressive perspectives can find common ground in the necessity for a transparent and accountable clemency process. Ensuring that clemency decisions are made with due diligence and proper authority is a shared value. Both viewpoints can agree on the importance of preserving the integrity of the presidential pardon power and preventing its misuse.

There is also a shared recognition that the clemency process can serve as an instrument for justice and mercy, reflecting the nation's commitment to fairness and rehabilitation. Identifying and rectifying procedural shortcomings, while respecting the underlying humanitarian and corrective goals of clemency, is a bipartisan objective that can strengthen confidence in the executive branch and the rule of law.