Sponsor Advertisement
Documentary Claims Disclosure of UFOs and Government Secrecy
Ai generated image of a ufo over a city harbor

Documentary Claims Disclosure of UFOs and Government Secrecy

"The Age of Disclosure," a documentary featuring high-ranking officials, alleges a cover-up of UFOs and non-human life by the U.S. government.

A new documentary titled "The Age of Disclosure" is set to unveil claims of unexplained aerial phenomena and an extensive cover-up by the U.S. government. The film includes testimony from current and former high-ranking officials, suggesting the existence of non-human intelligent life and a clandestine effort to keep this information from the public.

Scheduled for release on November 21 on Prime Video, with Oscar-qualifying screenings in major cities, "The Age of Disclosure" is directed by Dan Farah and boasts a cast of 34 senior officials across the political spectrum. In the film's trailer, Secretary of State Marco Rubio addresses instances of unidentified craft over restricted nuclear sites, stating, "We’ve had repeated instances of something operating in the airspace over restricted nuclear facilities — and it’s not ours."

The documentary explores the narrative of an "80-year global cover-up" and a "secret war" to reverse-engineer advanced technology. Rep. André Carson (D-IN) remarked on the extraordinary capabilities of these phenomena, describing them as "otherworldly things that are performing maneuvers that haven’t been seen."

One of the most significant claims in the film comes from Jay Stratton, allegedly the former head of the government's Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Task Force. Stratton claims to have witnessed non-human craft and beings. The documentary also questions the level of presidential knowledge on the subject, with Rubio suggesting that even presidents have been kept on a "need-to-know basis."

Director Farah spoke to Entertainment Weekly about the gravity of the revelations, calling it "the biggest disinformation campaign in the history of the US government." He contends that the facts surrounding UFOs have been obscured for decades, and it's time for the truth to come to light.

The focus of the documentary extends into national security concerns, probing the potential danger of adversarial nations weaponizing this technology. It features interviews with bipartisan figures such as Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) and Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), as well as former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper.

Amid these revelations, national security remains at the forefront of government action. Recent developments saw the dismissal of State Department foreign service officer Daniel Choi, after he concealed a relationship with the daughter of a Chinese Communist Party affiliate. An internal review ordered by Rubio and approved by President Trump led to the firing of Choi, who admitted to defying government rules for personal reasons.

The documentary aims to increase awareness and promote transparency on a topic that has long been shrouded in mystery. As it approaches its release date, "The Age of Disclosure" is poised to spark public discourse and potentially influence government transparency regarding unidentified aerial phenomena.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

"The Age of Disclosure" documentary could be a watershed moment in understanding our place in the cosmos and addressing systemic secrecy within government bodies. Progressives have long championed transparency and accountability from our leaders, and the alleged 80-year cover-up of UFO phenomena is deeply troubling.

If these claims are valid, we must consider the implications for our environment and humanity's future. The existence of advanced non-human technology begs the question of sustainable development and the potential for peaceful coexistence. It also raises systemic concerns about who has access to this knowledge and how it's been used.

The case of Daniel Choi presents a complex issue. While personal privacy is important, the potential risk to national security cannot be ignored. A progressive approach would advocate for balanced measures that protect individual rights while safeguarding the collective well-being.

Conservative View

The upcoming documentary "The Age of Disclosure" brings to light concerns that resonate with conservative values, particularly regarding national security and government transparency. The possibility of non-human technology operating on Earth has significant implications for our military and defense strategies. Every effort must be made to ensure that the United States maintains a technological advantage, especially if there is a chance that foreign adversaries could reverse-engineer such advanced capabilities.

Limited government is a cornerstone of conservative ideology, but it should not come at the expense of national security. The firing of Daniel Choi underscores the importance of stringent vetting and adherence to protocols when national security is at stake. It's commendable that President Trump and Secretary Rubio took decisive action upon discovering a potential breach.

As conservatives, we uphold the value of truth and transparency from our government. If the allegations presented in the documentary are grounded in fact, Americans deserve to know. However, we must navigate these disclosures with caution, ensuring that sensitive information does not compromise our national defense or global standing.

Common Ground

The revelations promised by "The Age of Disclosure" could serve as a unifying topic for both conservatives and progressives. There is a shared interest in ensuring national security, especially when faced with the possibility of unknown technologies. Both sides of the political spectrum can agree on the need for transparency and accurate information dissemination from the government to the public.

A bipartisan commitment to investigating these phenomena and developing appropriate responses could lead to collaborative efforts to safeguard our nation while respecting individual liberties. Furthermore, the potential environmental and societal impacts of non-human technology invite joint exploration of sustainable policies that benefit all.