Sponsor Advertisement
CNN Analyst Dubs Trump 'Most Influential President' in Decades

CNN Analyst Dubs Trump 'Most Influential President' in Decades

CNN's Harry Enten unexpectedly hailed Trump as the 'most influential president' in modern history, focusing on his significant policy shifts.

In a remarkable on-air statement, CNN analyst Harry Enten proclaimed Donald Trump to be the "most influential president" of the current century, and potentially further back. Enten's commentary highlighted Trump's policies' far-reaching impact on tariffs, immigration, and executive orders, reshaping the United States like no leader in recent times.

The discussion centered on the significant rise in tariffs under Trump's administration, with the effective U.S. tariff rate reaching 18 percent in 2025—the highest since the era of Franklin D. Roosevelt. This marks a stark increase from the mere 2 percent the year before, indicating a sweeping shift in U.S. trade policy with extensive domestic and international effects. Tariffs, which are taxes on imported goods aimed at protecting local industries, can lead to increased expenses for consumers and strained relations with trading partners.

Enten's analysis spotlighted how Trump's expanded tariff use is altering economic dynamics on a global scale. Another area where Trump has made notable changes is immigration policy. Enten pointed out a 60 percent decrease in net migration to the U.S., a drop that could lead to the nation experiencing net negative migration for the first time in over fifty years. In 2024, the net migration was approximately 2.8 million, but the numbers are rapidly declining due to current policies. These changes have profound implications for labor markets, social services, and demographic trends nationwide, reflecting a continuation of the administration's focus on stricter border control and immigration law enforcement.

Additionally, Trump's exercise of executive power reached a frequency not observed since the mid-20th century. In 2025, he signed 180 executive orders, outpacing any president since Roosevelt. For context, former President Joe Biden issued 77 executive orders in his first year. Enten underscored this aggressive use of executive authority as evidence of Trump's resolve to reshape government policy swiftly and decisively, often circumventing congressional standstill.

Enten's acknowledgment of Trump's historic influence is particularly notable given CNN's history of critical coverage of the president. The network has faced repeated allegations of partisan bias, with studies demonstrating a predominant focus on negative coverage of Trump. A 2017 Harvard report indicated that 93 percent of CNN's coverage of Trump carried a negative tone during his first 100 days in office, further blurring the lines between news reporting and commentary.

The CNN analyst's candid recognition of Trump’s impact diverges from the network's usual narrative and has garnered considerable attention. He concluded the segment with a statement that underscored the gravity of Trump’s presidency, saying, “Love it, like it, or lump it, it truly is history-making.” Enten's analysis stands as a mainstream acknowledgment of Trump's profound and enduring effect on the nation's economic and social trajectory.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

While recognizing Trump's significant impact, progressives would be remiss not to express concern over the potential downsides of his policies. The increased tariffs, while intended to protect domestic industries, can have the unintended consequence of raising consumer prices and igniting trade wars that harm global relationships and economies.

The sharp decline in net migration under Trump's policies is troubling from a humanitarian and diversity standpoint. Progressives argue that immigration enriches the cultural fabric and economic vitality of the nation. The potential shift toward net negative migration poses a threat to the diversity and inclusivity that are core to progressive values.

Furthermore, Trump's prolific use of executive orders raises alarm about the concentration of power in the executive branch. Progressives typically advocate for a more balanced approach to governance, emphasizing the importance of checks and balances and the role of Congress in policymaking.

From a progressive perspective, while Trump's influence is undeniable, the long-term implications of his policies warrant careful scrutiny, ensuring that they serve the collective well-being and uphold the principles of social justice and equity.

Conservative View

Enten's acknowledgment of President Trump's influence is a refreshing bout of honesty from a network often criticized for its bias. Trump's aggressive stance on tariffs reflects a commitment to protecting American industries, a principle central to conservative economic philosophy. Despite criticism, this approach promotes domestic manufacturing and job creation, embodying the conservative value of economic nationalism.

On immigration, Trump's policies underscore the importance of the rule of law and national sovereignty, foundational tenets of conservative ideology. The decrease in net migration aligns with the conservative emphasis on controlled, legal immigration, which is viewed as crucial for maintaining the nation's security and social cohesion.

The prolific use of executive orders by Trump signifies a hands-on approach to leadership, a quality often appreciated by conservatives. While some may argue that it bypasses legislative processes, it can also be seen as a necessary measure to cut through the red tape of a gridlocked Congress, delivering on campaign promises and swiftly implementing policies that reflect the will of the electorate.

In summary, from a conservative perspective, President Trump's policies, as highlighted by Enten, demonstrate a strong, decisive leadership style that prioritizes American interests, enforces immigration laws, and champions a free market tempered by protective measures for U.S. industry.

Common Ground

Despite diverging viewpoints on Trump's influence, there is potential common ground in the pursuit of policies that benefit the nation. Both conservatives and progressives can agree on the importance of a robust economy. Where conservatives see protective tariffs as a means to bolster domestic industry, progressives may find common cause in the goal of creating jobs—though they may prefer different methods.

In terms of immigration, both sides might find agreement in the need for comprehensive reform that ensures security while also upholding America's tradition of welcoming immigrants. The focus could be on creating a system that is fair, legal, and beneficial to the economy and society as a whole.

The use of executive orders, while a point of contention, also presents an opportunity for consensus on the need for effective governance. Both sides can advocate for a government that responds to the needs of the people, whether through legislative collaboration or executive action when necessary.

Ultimately, the shared goal is a prosperous, secure, and fair America, with the recognition that diverse approaches can lead to the same desired outcomes.