Sponsor Advertisement
Cincinnati Police Chief Teresa Theetge on Paid Leave Amid Leadership Review

Cincinnati Police Chief Teresa Theetge on Paid Leave Amid Leadership Review

Cincinnati Police Chief Teresa Theetge has been placed on administrative leave for an internal review of her leadership following a violent incident and rising safety concerns. Assistant Chief Adam Hennie steps in as interim chief during the investigation.

Cincinnati Police Chief Teresa Theetge has been temporarily relieved of her duties and placed on paid administrative leave as city officials initiate an internal review of her leadership capabilities. The decision comes in the wake of national attention regarding Theetge's handling of a racially charged downtown brawl in July that resulted in serious injuries to two white individuals, attacked by a black mob.

Assistant Chief Adam Hennie has been appointed to serve as interim chief, tasked with the responsibility of ensuring continuity and stability within the department during the period of investigation. This administrative action follows the indictment of seven individuals on charges including felonious assault and aggravated riot, related to the July incident that saw a woman, subsequently identified as Holly, suffer brain trauma and extensive bruising.

City Manager Sheryl Long has described the move as a necessary step to maintain steady leadership amid escalating safety concerns in the city. Long's statement, as reported by The Daily Caller, emphasized the city's commitment to upholding the highest standards of service for residents while ensuring departmental stability. "I have full confidence in Interim Chief Hennie and the command staff to continue their critical work at this time," Long stated.

Theetge has been under scrutiny not only for her response to the July brawl but also for her overall qualifications as chief. Critics have suggested that her appointment may have been unduly influenced by diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, with some labeling her a "DEI hire." Furthermore, a lawsuit filed by four former Cincinnati Police Department officers alleges discriminatory practices under Theetge's leadership. The plaintiffs, Capt. Robert Wilson and Lieutenants Patrick Caton, Gerald Hodges, and Andrew Mitchell, claim that white male officers were overlooked for promotions and assignments in favor of non-white and female colleagues, regardless of seniority or experience.

The controversy unfolds against the backdrop of a surge in violent incidents in downtown Cincinnati, including multiple shootings and a fatality within a span of less than eight hours last week. In response to the city's escalating crime rates, Theetge controversially advised residents to "learn how to behave," a comment that has since fueled public backlash and intensified criticism of her approach to community safety.

Amidst the controversy, Theetge has enlisted the services of employment attorney Stephen Imm, signaling her intent to challenge or respond to the administrative review. Imm has characterized Theetge as a "political scapegoat" and "political pawn," revealing that she was asked to resign last week but was placed on leave upon refusal. "I’m afraid that they’re going to work very hard to see if they can’t dig up some dirt on this person that they’ve just removed from office without cause," Imm stated, as reported by WVXU.

Despite the unfolding events, Mayor Aftab Pureval has expressed support for the city manager's decision and confidence in the interim leadership. Experts point out that the situation highlights a growing divide between law enforcement leadership and the public's expectations for accountability. The administrative leave presents an opportunity for the city to evaluate the chief’s effectiveness, restore public confidence, and reinforce competent leadership during a time of heightened scrutiny and the need for experienced leadership to maintain public safety and morale within the police department.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The case of Cincinnati Police Chief Teresa Theetge's administrative leave is a complex one, touching on several issues central to progressive values, such as accountability, diversity, and systemic reform in policing. Progressives believe that leadership in law enforcement must reflect the diversity of the communities they serve. While critics may label Theetge a "DEI hire," it is essential to recognize that diversity in leadership positions can bring different perspectives and experiences that are invaluable in creating a more inclusive and equitable police force.

However, diversity alone is not enough. The progressive viewpoint also demands accountability and transparency in policing. Theetge's handling of the downtown brawl and subsequent comments to the public have rightly been called into question. Her remarks can be interpreted as dismissive of the legitimate concerns of residents regarding their safety and the conduct of the police department. Progressives would argue that such statements do not foster trust between the community and law enforcement.

The lawsuit filed by the four former officers alleging discriminatory practices under Theetge's leadership is also a cause for concern. It highlights the need for systemic change within the police department to ensure that promotions and assignments are fair and based on merit, without discrimination against any group. A progressive approach would advocate for a thorough investigation into these claims to root out any systemic biases and implement policies that promote true equality.

The administrative review of Theetge's leadership is a step in the right direction, offering an opportunity to reassess the department's direction and policies. Progressives would support a comprehensive evaluation that not only looks at individual performance but also at the broader systemic issues within the department that may hinder its ability to serve the community effectively.

Conservative View

The administrative leave of Cincinnati Police Chief Teresa Theetge is a concerning reflection of the state of law enforcement in our cities. From a conservative standpoint, the prioritization of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives over merit-based appointments can potentially compromise the effectiveness of our police force. The allegations that Chief Theetge was a "DEI hire" raise questions about the integrity of the selection process and whether it truly reflects the qualifications necessary for such a critical role.

Moreover, the lawsuit alleging discriminatory practices against white male officers under Theetge’s leadership is troubling. It suggests a reversal of the principles of fairness and equal opportunity that conservatives hold dear. Promotions and assignments should be based on experience, performance, and merit, not on checking boxes for diversity quotas. This lawsuit could be indicative of a larger issue within the department, where identity politics overshadow the core mission of law enforcement—to protect and serve all citizens equally.

Theetge's controversial advice to residents to "learn how to behave" in response to the crime surge, while perhaps blunt, underscores a valid conservative perspective on personal responsibility and the rule of law. It is imperative for individuals to conduct themselves appropriately and for parents to instill values of respect and civility in their children. The breakdown of societal norms often leads to the lawlessness we are witnessing in our urban centers.

The conservative viewpoint emphasizes the need for strong, experienced leadership in law enforcement, capable of addressing the challenges of rising crime without succumbing to political pressures. The city's decision to place Theetge on leave and conduct a review should be thorough and fair, ensuring that any actions taken are in the best interest of public safety and effective policing.

Common Ground

Both conservative and progressive viewpoints can agree on the fundamental need for effective, accountable leadership within law enforcement. There is common ground in the belief that police chiefs and their departments should be held to the highest standards and that their actions should reflect the best interests of public safety. Additionally, both sides recognize the importance of fair and