Sponsor Advertisement
California Parole Board Approves Release of Convicted Child Molester

California Parole Board Approves Release of Convicted Child Molester

David Allen Funston, convicted of multiple counts of child molestation, may be released on elderly parole in California, sparking widespread controversy.

In a contentious decision by the California Board of Parole Hearings, David Allen Funston, a 64-year-old convicted child molester, has been granted elderly parole. Funston was convicted in 1999 on 16 counts of kidnapping and child molestation for crimes committed against children from 1995 to 1996. The individuals affected were as young as three, and at least eight children testified against him, providing chilling accounts of their ordeals.

The parole board's approval follows Funston's sentence of over 20 years and three consecutive 25-to-life terms. Under the state's elderly parole rules, inmates who are 50 or older and have served at least 20 continuous years may be considered for release. This consideration includes an assessment of potential risks to public safety. The elderly parole eligibility was expanded in 2021 under legislation signed by Governor Gavin Newsom, which now includes inmates like Funston.

Critics of the decision argue that this serves as a "Get Out of Jail Free" card for convicted child molesters and have called into question the prudence of Governor Newsom's legislative changes. Anne Marie Schubert, the former deputy district attorney for Sacramento County who prosecuted Funston's case, expressed her vehement opposition to his potential release. Schubert has suggested that Funston's history makes him a suitable candidate for civil commitment under the state's sexually violent predator law due to his predatory behavior and repeated use of force.

While the parole board has approved Funston's release, he is not yet free. The next step could involve SVP screening, entailing clinical evaluations and possible court hearings to decide whether civil commitment is warranted. Survivors of Funston's crimes and Schubert are advocating for this process, aiming to reduce the risk he may pose.

The ruling has reignited outrage among the victims and the wider community, with one survivor labeling Funston as a "monster." There are concerns that the decision could erode public trust in the justice system and potentially endanger children. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation has not announced an estimated release date for Funston, who remains incarcerated at the California Institution for Men in Chino.

The case underscores the tensions inherent in elderly parole provisions and the imperative to ensure community safety. The debate over the application of parole rules to elderly inmates with violent sexual offenses continues, with cases like Funston's highlighting the difficulty of balancing legal guidelines with the imperative to protect society's most vulnerable.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The parole of David Allen Funston raises complex questions about aging inmates and the balance between rehabilitation and public safety. While progressives champion the humane treatment of all individuals, including those incarcerated, it is paramount to also consider the systemic impact on survivors and the broader community's sense of safety. This case impels us to confront the difficult issues surrounding the reintegration of elderly inmates, particularly those with a history of sexual violence against children.

It is imperative that we address the potential risks to public safety and the need for continued protection of children and survivors. The parole process should include comprehensive evaluations that assess the likelihood of re-offense and the capacity for rehabilitation. The concept of social justice extends to ensuring that our criminal justice system does not inadvertently harm those it seeks to protect. As such, the decision to grant parole must be weighed carefully against the societal imperative to prevent further trauma and uphold the collective well-being.

Conservative View

The parole of David Allen Funston, a convicted child molester, underscores a failure in the justice system to prioritize public safety and the welfare of victims. The expansion of California's elderly parole eligibility, under Governor Newsom's administration, raises significant concerns about the state's commitment to safeguarding children and the community from sexual predators. The principle of individual liberty must not be misconstrued as leniency for those who have perpetrated heinous crimes against the most defenseless members of our society.

This decision reflects a dangerous trend of favoring rehabilitative ideals over the traditional values of justice and protection of the innocent. While conservatives support the notion of redemption, there must be a balance with the need for retribution and deterrence, particularly in cases involving crimes against children. The potential release of individuals like Funston after substantial sentences does not align with the concept of limited government when it endangers public safety. It is crucial to uphold a justice system that prioritizes the rights of victims and the security of the populace over the interests of convicted felons, especially those with a history of violent sexual offenses.

Common Ground

In the case of David Allen Funston's parole, there is common ground in the shared concern for the safety and well-being of children and the community. Both conservative and progressive viewpoints agree on the essential role of the justice system in protecting the vulnerable and maintaining public trust. There is also consensus on the importance of rigorous and thorough evaluations in parole decisions, particularly when dealing with individuals convicted of serious offenses against minors.

A bipartisan solution could be the development of a more robust and transparent parole review process for elderly inmates, which would consider the nature of their crimes, the potential for rehabilitation, and the impact on victims and society. There is a collective interest in ensuring that justice is served while also respecting the human dignity of all involved. By focusing on these shared goals, stakeholders can work towards a balanced and effective approach to parole that reconciles legal eligibility with the imperative to safeguard community safety.