Sponsor Advertisement
California Ordered to Repay Over $1 Billion in Medicaid Funds

California Ordered to Repay Over $1 Billion in Medicaid Funds

Federal auditors have mandated California to return more than $1 billion in Medicaid funds, alleging improper billing for healthcare services to illegal aliens. The CMS under the Trump administration has tightened oversight, with California being the primary debtor among several states.

Federal auditors have directed the State of California to reimburse the federal government more than $1 billion in Medicaid funds. This order comes after findings that the state incorrectly charged the federal government for healthcare services provided to individuals residing in the country illegally. The audits, spearheaded by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) during the Trump administration, have escalated federal scrutiny of state Medicaid programs.

California accounts for the lion's share of approximately $1.35 billion in dubious reimbursements identified across multiple Democrat-led states, including Illinois, Washington, Oregon, Colorado, Minnesota, New York, and the District of Columbia. Federal law confines Medicaid coverage for illegal aliens to emergency medical services only, barring the application of federal funds for routine or elective care.

CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz disclosed that investigators have discovered additional improper expenditures, elevating the total questioned amount to over $1.8 billion across eight states. States failed to provide sufficient documentation to prove that non-emergency care for illegal aliens was financed exclusively with state dollars, as mandated by federal law. Consequently, CMS is enforcing corrective measures. Nearly $300 million in federal Medicaid funds will be withheld from California until the state can substantiate compliance with federal guidelines.

Dr. Oz stated, “These states failed to provide that for this $1.8 billion. So today, CMS is announcing that we’re withholding nearly $300 million from California—which is by far the worst offender—until they demonstrate to our satisfaction that they’re spending that money properly.”

The controversy originates from expansions to Medi-Cal under Governor Gavin Newsom's administration. In 2022, the program extended coverage to non-citizen seniors, and in January 2024, it further broadened eligibility to include all illegal aliens, irrespective of age. This expansion led to a surge in enrollment, with approximately 1.7 million non-citizens, making up about 11 percent of total Medi-Cal participants, as reported by the California Globe.

State analysts have noted that these expansions have propelled annual Medi-Cal expenditures to nearly $10 billion, contributing to a $6.2 billion deficit detected in early 2025. Some projections indicate that the total cost to taxpayers could reach $23 billion over two years, forcing California to request emergency loans and federal aid to maintain the program.

Republican legislators have condemned the expansion as a foreseeable fiscal mismanagement. State Senator Brian Jones (R-San Diego) remarked that he had cautioned Newsom over a year ago against proceeding with the expansion, predicting it would destabilize the healthcare system. Jones emphasized that the state gave precedence to coverage for illegal immigrants over legal residents and urged for Medi-Cal to revert to its foundational intent.

Federal audits are in progress, and Dr. Oz indicated that CMS now conducts quarterly reviews of state Medicaid programs to guarantee the appropriate use of federal funds. “The state is giving that money back. We will collect the rest of it, and we’re continuing to audit quarterly the state Medicaid system,” he affirmed, clarifying that elective procedures, such as dental cleanings, are ineligible for federal reimbursement.

California officials have repudiated any misconduct, maintaining that federal funds are confined to emergency services and that non-emergency care is financed with state resources. However, auditors have reported that the billing records inspected during the CMS audits do not corroborate these assertions, contradicting years of state assurances.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

From a progressive standpoint, the expansion of Medi-Cal in California represents a commitment to healthcare as a human right, regardless of immigration status. Progressives argue that providing healthcare to all residents, including non-citizens, is a moral imperative that benefits public health and the economy by preventing the spread of diseases and reducing the costs of uncompensated emergency care.

The audits and subsequent actions by CMS are seen as punitive measures that disproportionately target states attempting to address healthcare inequities. Progressives emphasize that healthcare access for non-citizens is a matter of public health, and states should have the autonomy to use their resources to ensure that all residents have the necessary care.

Furthermore, the progressive viewpoint highlights the need for comprehensive immigration reform that would allow non-citizens to contribute fully to society, including paying taxes that could fund their healthcare. The focus should be on creating inclusive policies that integrate non-citizens into the healthcare system, rather than penalizing states for attempting to provide essential services.

Conservative View

The recent findings by federal auditors regarding California's misuse of Medicaid funds are a clear example of what conservatives have long argued: unchecked expansion of entitlement programs leads to fiscal irresponsibility and abuse of taxpayer dollars. The fact that California, along with other Democrat-led states, has been unable to provide adequate documentation for their Medicaid spending is indicative of a broader issue of governance.

The conservative policy perspective hinges on strict adherence to legal stipulations, particularly concerning federal funds' use. Medicaid, a program designed to assist the most vulnerable in society, should not be exploited to extend benefits to individuals who are in the country illegally, especially when such extensions are not covered by federal law. The withholding of nearly $300 million in federal Medicaid funds from California is a necessary step to ensure accountability and compliance with federal regulations.

Moreover, the conservative viewpoint underscores the importance of prioritizing citizens and legal residents in the allocation of limited resources. State Senator Brian Jones's criticism of Governor Newsom's Medi-Cal expansion reflects the conservative belief that such policies not only burden taxpayers but also potentially jeopardize the quality of care for legal beneficiaries. The expectation is for state programs to return to their original purposes, focusing on the needs of American citizens first and foremost.

Common Ground

Both conservatives and progressives can agree on the necessity of accountability and transparency in government spending. Ensuring that taxpayer dollars are used appropriately and in accordance with the law is a fundamental principle that transcends political ideology. Additionally, there is common ground in recognizing the importance of Medicaid in providing essential healthcare services to those in need. Both sides may also concur that long-term solutions are required to address the healthcare needs of all residents, including non-citizens, in a manner that is both fiscally responsible and humane.