Sponsor Advertisement
Book Uncovers Foreign Funding in U.S. Elections via Visa Program

Book Uncovers Foreign Funding in U.S. Elections via Visa Program

A new book by Peter Schweizer reveals how the EB-5 visa program facilitated foreign investments into U.S. campaigns, predominantly from Chinese nationals.

Investigative journalist Peter Schweizer's latest book, "The Invisible Coup: How American Elites and Foreign Powers Use Immigration as a Weapon," has brought to light a decades-old visa program that appears to have been a conduit for significant foreign funds into American political campaigns. The Employment-Based Fifth Preference visa, or EB-5, was introduced in the 1990 Immigration Act to attract foreign capital and create jobs in the U.S. However, Schweizer's findings suggest that the program's lenient structure has been manipulated to channel millions of dollars into the election process, primarily benefiting Democratic candidates.

The EB-5 program allows foreign nationals to gain green cards and permanent residency by investing a minimum of $1.05 million, or $800,000 in economically distressed areas, and generating at least ten jobs. Despite the program's investment goals, Schweizer alleges that the fast-track nature of the application process, which requires minimal vetting, has been exploited for political fundraising.

Key figures tied to the EB-5 program's inception include Maria Hsia and John Huang, who later became central to the fundraising controversies of the 1996 election cycle. The Senate investigation identified Hsia as an "agent of the Chinese government," and both Hsia and Huang faced legal repercussions for their involvement in campaign finance law violations. James Riady, another figure linked to the program, pleaded guilty to conspiracy charges related to illegal contributions.

Schweizer's research suggests that the EB-5 program was deliberately designed to facilitate foreign financial contributions to U.S. campaigns. Foreign nationals, after obtaining permanent residency, could then legally donate to political campaigns despite not being eligible to vote. In one case, Danhong "Jean" Chen, a Chinese citizen, and her firm assisted investors in securing EB-5 visas while directing considerable sums to Democratic campaigns.

The book also highlights firms specializing in EB-5 applications that blatantly advertised to potential clients the ability to make political donations and arrange meetings with high-ranking U.S. officials. The predominance of Chinese applicants raises alarm over potential influence exerted by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), given its interest in influencing Western politics.

An example of the potential reach of this influence was seen during Hillary Clinton's 2008 presidential primary campaign, where numerous donations traced back to New York City's Chinatown and "neighborhood associations" with alleged ties to Beijing's United Front Work Department.

Schweizer calls attention to the discrepancy between China's official policy, which limits citizens to transferring no more than $50,000 abroad annually, and the freedom EB-5 recruiting firms operate with inside China, despite investment thresholds far exceeding this cap. The book underscores the national security concerns posed by allowing foreign nationals, potentially with CCP connections, to invest in sensitive U.S. infrastructure projects.

In conclusion, "The Invisible Coup" sheds light on how the EB-5 visa system, ostensibly created to stimulate economic growth, may have been designed and used by individuals with ties to the Chinese Communist Party to funnel untraceable political contributions into American elections over multiple decades.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The findings in Peter Schweizer's book are deeply troubling from a progressive standpoint, as they highlight the risks of allowing unchecked capital to flow into political campaigns. The progressive vision for a fair democratic process is one where every voice has equal weight, which is directly undermined by the influx of foreign money into elections through the EB-5 visa program.

The program's manipulation by foreign, especially Chinese, interests to gain leverage in American politics is antithetical to the progressive values of transparency and equity in the electoral system. It is a stark reminder of the need for campaign finance reform and stronger regulations to prevent wealthy individuals and foreign actors from skewing the political landscape in their favor.

Moreover, progressives would emphasize the need for comprehensive immigration reform that aligns with our values of inclusivity and community well-being. While foreign investment can be beneficial, it must not come at the cost of the public's trust or national security. Legislation must ensure that programs like EB-5 are not only economically beneficial but also socially responsible and free from avenues that allow undue influence on our democracy.

It is incumbent upon the government and community leaders to work together to close loopholes in the system that can be exploited by foreign interests. Maintaining the integrity of our elections and protecting them from external influence is paramount in upholding the democratic principles that are the foundation of our society.

Conservative View

The revelations in Peter Schweizer's "The Invisible Coup" regarding the misuse of the EB-5 visa program for political fundraising should be of grave concern to all who value the integrity of our electoral process. Central to conservative principles is the preservation of American sovereignty, which is compromised when foreign entities can influence our political landscape through financial means.

This situation underscores the necessity for stringent vetting and oversight in immigration and investment programs. The exploitation of the EB-5 program for political gain represents not just a breach of national trust but also a clear example of government overreach failing to protect American interests.

Conservatives argue for policies that encourage economic growth and foreign investment but within a framework that safeguards national security and electoral integrity. The EB-5 program, in its current state, appears to have strayed from its original intent, becoming a tool for foreign powers to gain undue influence over American politics.

It is imperative to reform such immigration programs to ensure they serve the American people first and foremost. This includes tightening application procedures, enhancing transparency, and ensuring that investments truly benefit the U.S. economy without compromising the democratic process. A return to the principle of putting America first is crucial in addressing such systemic vulnerabilities.

Common Ground

The concerns raised by the EB-5 visa program's implications in political fundraising resonate across ideological divides. Transparency, integrity, and the security of the electoral process are values shared by conservatives and progressives alike.

Both sides can agree on the need for stringent vetting of foreign investments and the individuals involved to ensure they serve the national interest without compromising democratic values. There is a mutual understanding that foreign influence in American politics is detrimental to the sovereignty and functioning of our democracy.

A bipartisan approach to reforming the EB-5 program could focus on increasing transparency, enhancing national security protocols, and ensuring that the investments made truly contribute to the American economy. By working collaboratively, lawmakers can close loopholes that allow for the misuse of such programs and restore confidence in the integrity of our electoral system.