Sponsor Advertisement
Bipartisan Majority Urges Action on $38 Trillion National Debt

Bipartisan Majority Urges Action on $38 Trillion National Debt

A survey by the Peter G. Peterson Foundation shows 82% of voters demand immediate action on the $38 trillion national debt as fiscal concerns intensify.

As the nation embarks on 2026, a resounding message from the American electorate calls for a concentrated effort to address the nation's financial health. The latest January 2026 index by the Peter G. Peterson Foundation reveals a striking consensus among voters, with 82% urging for immediate congressional attention to the escalating $38 trillion national debt.

The foundation's fiscal confidence index, which aims to gauge public sentiment on the nation's fiscal outlook, has scored 51 out of 100, where 100 signifies a neutral stance. Compared to the previous year, this marks a six-point decrease, underscoring heightened voter apprehension regarding the country's fiscal path.

"The rapidly rising debt puts upward pressure on inflation and interest rates, driving up the cost of living and harming economic growth." – Michael A. Peterson, CEO of the Peterson Foundation

This growing concern arrives in the wake of a tumultuous fiscal year, which included the longest government shutdown recorded in history, the passage of an unprecedentedly large reconciliation bill, and the highest interest costs the nation has ever seen. These developments have thrust fiscal issues into the limelight as candidates prepare for the 2026 election cycle.

Fortune magazine highlighted remarks from Michael A. Peterson, CEO of the Peterson Foundation, who emphasized the tangible effects of the burgeoning debt on American households. He drew a direct correlation between the rising debt levels and increased living expenses, amplifying inflation and interest rates, which in turn hinder economic growth.

Peterson's insights signal a clear expectation for political candidates: economic stewardship is a crucial factor in the upcoming elections. He advocates for engaging the electorate with tangible, long-term strategies to stabilize the debt and thereby reinforce economic stability.

The survey also uncovers a significant bipartisan agreement on the urgency of debt reduction. A substantial 79% of voters believe curtailing the national debt should be among the top three priorities for both President Donald Trump and Congress. Support for debt reduction is particularly strong among Republican voters, with 89% deeming it a primary concern. Democrats and Independents echo this sentiment at 75% and 70%, respectively.

The Peterson Foundation's index measures voter sentiment across three critical dimensions: Concern, Priority, and Expectations, each holding equal weight in the final composite score. The December 2025 figures present a concerning portrait of public opinion. The Concern score registered at 49, reflecting profound unease about the trajectory of the national debt. The Priority score, at an alarmingly low 22, indicates a perception that elected officials are not adequately focusing on the issue. Conversely, the Expectations score hit 80, suggesting a prevailing skepticism that the debt situation will improve absent significant policy intervention.

This consensus on the national debt issue comes amidst a climate of fiscal instability and political anticipation, with Americans from all political backgrounds eager for effective governance and responsible fiscal policy.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The staggering $38 trillion national debt is more than a figure; it represents a profound moral and economic challenge that requires immediate and collective action. From a progressive perspective, the focus must be on creating a fair and equitable society where the burden of debt does not fall disproportionately on the most vulnerable.

We must examine the systemic factors contributing to this debt, such as the inequitable distribution of tax obligations and the underinvestment in social programs that could ultimately reduce long-term expenditures. Addressing these issues requires a comprehensive approach that may include progressive taxation, closing corporate tax loopholes, and investing in education, healthcare, and infrastructure, which in turn can stimulate economic growth and reduce the deficit.

Moreover, tackling the national debt should not come at the expense of social welfare. It is crucial to balance fiscal prudence with the protection of social safety nets that ensure the well-being of all citizens. By adopting policies that promote economic equity and environmental sustainability, we can work toward a solution that not only reduces the national debt but also moves us towards a more just and prosperous society.

Conservative View

The pressing issue of the $38 trillion national debt commands immediate and decisive action. As conservatives, we uphold the principles of fiscal responsibility and limited government intervention in the economy. The survey results from the Peter G. Peterson Foundation resonate with our conviction that government spending must be curtailed and economic policies restructured to foster individual prosperity and national solvency.

High levels of national debt not only threaten to diminish the economic freedoms of future generations but also impede current economic growth by exerting inflationary pressures and crowding out private investment. It is imperative that we advocate for policies that prioritize debt reduction, such as entitlement reform and a reduction of non-essential government spending.

The conservative approach emphasizes the need for a balanced budget, the importance of reducing regulatory burdens that stifle business innovation, and the implementation of tax policies that incentivize productivity. By adhering to these fiscal measures, we can ensure a sustainable economic future that benefits all Americans.

Common Ground

The shared concern among Americans regarding the national debt is a starting point for bipartisan dialogue and cooperation. Both conservative and progressive perspectives recognize the importance of addressing the nation's fiscal challenges to secure economic stability for current and future generations.

There is common ground in the belief that responsible fiscal management is essential. This includes the efficient allocation of resources, transparency in government spending, and the pursuit of policies that promote economic growth without exacerbating debt levels.

Engagement from both sides of the political spectrum is necessary to formulate and implement a balanced approach to debt reduction. This might involve a combination of responsible spending cuts, fair tax reforms, and strategic investments that foster long-term economic health. Through collaborative effort and mutual understanding, it is possible to devise a bipartisan pathway that aligns with American values of responsibility, sustainability, and shared prosperity.