Sponsor Advertisement
Stricter Scrutiny for Marriage-Based Green Card Applicants

Stricter Scrutiny for Marriage-Based Green Card Applicants

The Trump administration has intensified the examination of marriage-based green card applications, focusing on verifying the authenticity of the marital relationship.

The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is ushering in a new phase of enforcement regarding marriage-based immigration. This shift represents a significant change from earlier practices, where such applications were often processed as standard procedure. Across the nation, immigration lawyers are reporting more rigorous examinations of cases that were previously deemed straightforward, with special attention being paid to the authenticity of the marital union.

Immigration attorney Brad Bernstein of Spar & Bernstein has advised his clients of the heightened importance of cohabitation in the eyes of USCIS. "Immigration officers do not care why you live apart, and they do not care if it's for work, school, money, or convenience," Bernstein stated. "So, if you're not living in the same house every day, immigration is going to start questioning the marriage."

This stringent evaluation process is part of broader efforts to address perceived misuses of various immigration pathways, including the Diversity Visa Lottery, which was recently discontinued following the involvement of a lottery recipient in serious criminal activity.

The USCIS insists that a marriage must be bona fide, entered in good faith, and not primarily for circumventing immigration rules. Even couples who satisfy all legal criteria can face rejection if authorities deduce that the union was established to obtain residency without a genuine spousal relationship.

The recent policies reflect the Trump administration's commitment to prioritizing the protection of American citizens and resources. Late in 2025, USCIS Director Joseph Edlow announced a thorough review of green cards for immigrants from countries of concern. "The protection of this country and of the American people remains paramount, and the American people will not bear the cost of prior policies," Edlow declared.

Legal professionals underscore that the new level of scrutiny aims to uphold the integrity of the immigration system and prevent fraudulent marriages. "Marrying a U.S. citizen no longer ensures residency," said Bernstein. "Applicants must demonstrate that their marriage is authentic and that they intend to live together as spouses."

For migrants seeking permanent residency through marriage, the implications are clear: evidencing cohabitation and a genuine relationship is now critical. Neglecting these requirements could lead to application denial, further federal investigation, and legal ramifications. This adherence to an enforcement-first approach underscores the administration's dedication to upholding immigration law and safeguarding public resources from abuse.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The recent measures instituted by the Trump administration to enforce stricter controls on marriage-based green card applications raise concerns about the potential for undue hardship on legitimate couples. Progressives believe in a compassionate and fair immigration system that acknowledges the complex realities of modern relationships and the necessity for some couples to live apart due to economic, educational, or professional circumstances.

While the intent to prevent fraudulent marriages is understandable, the implementation of such stringent standards could disproportionately affect lower-income couples and those in genuine relationships who must navigate a long-distance marriage. Progressive values emphasize the importance of considering the human impact of policy decisions and striving for an immigration system that balances enforcement with empathy.

Moreover, the discontinuation of the Diversity Visa Lottery eliminates a pathway that has historically enabled individuals from underrepresented nations to pursue the American dream. This decision could be seen as counterproductive to the progressive goal of fostering a diverse and inclusive society. It is crucial to find a balance that protects national security without sacrificing the values of diversity and opportunity.

In essence, while progressives recognize the need for immigration laws to be respected, they advocate for a humane approach that considers individual circumstances and promotes equitable treatment for all seeking a life in the United States.

Conservative View

The Trump administration's decision to enforce stricter regulations on marriage-based immigration applications is a commendable effort to preserve the integrity of our nation's immigration system. For too long, the lax oversight of these applications has potentially allowed individuals to exploit loopholes for personal gain, undermining the rule of law and the expectations placed upon legitimate immigrants.

By emphasizing the need for applicants to demonstrate cohabitation and a bona fide marital relationship, the government is taking necessary steps to protect the interests of American citizens. It ensures that immigration benefits are reserved for those who genuinely qualify rather than becoming a backdoor for illegal entry. This aligns with conservative principles advocating for individual responsibility and the importance of legal adherence.

The termination of the Diversity Visa Lottery also reflects a prudent policy change. The random selection process of this program did not effectively assess the merit or intentions of applicants, potentially jeopardizing national security. The conservative viewpoint supports immigration policies that prioritize the safety and well-being of American citizens first and foremost.

In conclusion, the administration's actions are a testament to the belief in limited government intervention where necessary, combined with a robust enforcement of existing laws. This approach ensures that public resources are not exploited and that the process of legal immigration remains fair and just for all involved.

Common Ground

In the debate surrounding the Trump administration's enforcement of marriage-based green card applications, there is potential common ground to be found. Both conservatives and progressives can agree on the fundamental importance of maintaining an immigration system that is fair, lawful, and respects the sanctity of marriage.

Both sides may concur that the aim should be to prevent fraudulent marriages designed to circumvent immigration laws. There is also a shared understanding that a secure and robust immigration system benefits the country by ensuring that resources are allocated fairly and that public trust in the system is upheld.

Finding practical, bipartisan solutions to strengthen immigration enforcement while also accommodating legitimate cases of long-distance marriage could be a shared goal. This could include refining application processes to better distinguish between fraud and genuine cases, providing clearer guidelines for applicants, and perhaps considering special exemptions where evidence of a legitimate reason for living apart is indisputable.

By focusing on these shared objectives, it is possible to create a more effective and compassionate immigration system that reflects the values of the American people and the principles upon which the nation was founded.