Sponsor Advertisement
Los Angeles Court Uncovers Surrogacy Trend Among Chinese Billionaires

Los Angeles Court Uncovers Surrogacy Trend Among Chinese Billionaires

A Los Angeles judge revealed a secretive practice where Chinese billionaires, such as videogame mogul Xu Bo, use American surrogates to create large families of U.S.-born children, challenging legal and ethical boundaries.

In a Los Angeles family court, Judge Amy Pellman and her clerks stumbled upon a startling pattern: a single Chinese billionaire's name surfaced time and again in surrogacy petitions for U.S.-born children. Xu Bo, a prominent Chinese videogame developer, sought legal custody of at least four unborn children via American surrogates. Further investigation revealed an even larger picture: Xu was connected to at least twelve more U.S.-born children through surrogacy.

During a confidential video hearing in the summer of 2023, Xu, speaking through an interpreter from China, explained to Judge Pellman his intention to father approximately 20 U.S. children, predominantly male, to inherit his business empire. Despite his ambitions, Xu admitted to not having met his existing children, who reside in Irvine, California, under nanny care.

Judge Pellman's decision to deny Xu's parental rights marked a rare moment of pushback in an industry known for its routine approvals. This decision left the involved children in a precarious legal state, highlighting the largely unregulated nature of the U.S. surrogacy market.

The Wall Street Journal reports that wealthy Chinese individuals are circumventing China's surrogacy ban by creating families via American surrogates. Inspired by figures like Elon Musk, with his 14 known children, they invest millions to craft extensive families. Xu, self-styled as "China's first father" and a critic of feminism, boasts over 100 children born through U.S. surrogacy on his company's social media.

Wang Huiwu, another affluent executive, has fathered 10 daughters with U.S. egg donors, allegedly planning strategic marriages for them. The clientele includes time-strapped executives, older parents, and same-sex couples, all able to afford the luxury of privacy and sidestep legal complications in China, some with political connections to avoid repercussions.

The burgeoning demand has fueled a comprehensive network of American surrogacy agencies, law firms, clinics, and nanny services. Parents can now send genetic material overseas and welcome a new child without setting foot in the United States, with costs reaching $200,000 per child.

American investors are tapping into this market, with Peter Thiel's family office backing IVF clinic chains in Southeast Asia and a new branch in Los Angeles. While most U.S. states permit international surrogacy arrangements, the practice has faced criticism in China, particularly when celebrities or officials are involved, due to ethical concerns and perceived exploitation.

U.S. citizenship, automatically granted to babies born on American soil under the 14th Amendment, remains a contentious political issue. In response to birth tourism, the State Department tightened visa rules in 2020, and an executive order by Donald Trump in January aimed to restrict citizenship for children of foreign nationals, pending Supreme Court review.

The case of Xu Bo and his peers reflects a complex intersection of international law, ethics, and the politics of citizenship, igniting debates on the implications of cross-border surrogacy and the definition of family in the modern world.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

From a progressive standpoint, the revelation of Chinese billionaires using American surrogates to father large numbers of U.S.-born children raises significant ethical and human rights concerns. Progressives advocate for the protection and empowerment of all individuals involved in surrogacy arrangements, including the surrogates, children, and intended parents.

Surrogacy should be a consensual and respectful process, free from gender discrimination and exploitation. Xu Bo's preference for male heirs is a clear example of gender bias that should not be accommodated in modern reproductive practices. Furthermore, the commodification of children and the surrogate's womb is deeply troubling.

Progressives call for international cooperation to create comprehensive guidelines that regulate surrogacy, ensuring that it is conducted with transparency and respect for human dignity. It is also crucial to uphold the rights of children born through surrogacy, regardless of their parents' nationality or intentions.

The focus should be on creating a fair and just system that recognizes the complexities of modern families while safeguarding the rights of all parties involved. Additionally, progressives emphasize the need to address the root causes of such practices, including gender inequality and restrictive reproductive policies in other countries.

Conservative View

The case of Chinese billionaires fathering dozens of U.S.-born children through surrogacy underscores the urgent need to reevaluate our surrogacy laws and immigration policies. The conservative perspective emphasizes the importance of upholding national sovereignty and the integrity of citizenship. The practice of wealthy foreigners exploiting America's surrogacy industry to amass large families of U.S. citizens not only distorts the intent of the 14th Amendment but also raises concerns over birth tourism and its impact on national security.

Conservatives argue for stricter regulations on surrogacy to prevent its misuse by individuals seeking to bypass their own country's laws. Moreover, the executive order by former President Trump to deny citizenship to children born in the U.S. to non-citizens is seen as a step toward protecting American values and resources. The Supreme Court's decision on this matter is eagerly awaited by those who believe citizenship should be more than an accident of birth but a privilege earned through legal and cultural ties to the country.

The idea that surrogacy can be used as a tool for foreign nationals to secure a foothold in the U.S. for their offspring is troubling. It is imperative to ensure that surrogacy is practiced ethically, prioritizing the welfare of the children and the surrogates involved, rather than serving as a loophole for the ultra-wealthy to exploit.

Common Ground

Both conservative and progressive viewpoints can find common ground in the need for ethical surrogacy practices that protect the rights and well-being of children, surrogates, and intended parents. There is mutual agreement on the importance of preventing exploitation and ensuring that surrogacy is carried out with dignity and respect for all involved. Both sides may also concur that international dialogue is necessary to address the challenges posed by cross-border surrogacy and to develop comprehensive regulations that can be respected universally.