Sponsor Advertisement
Georgetown Adjunct Professor's Racial Remarks Caught on Camera

Georgetown Adjunct Professor's Racial Remarks Caught on Camera

Video surfaces showing Jonathan Franklin, a Georgetown University adjunct professor, making derogatory remarks about black conservatives and his colleagues.

A recent undercover operation by investigative journalist James O'Keefe has brought to light a video of Jonathan Franklin, an adjunct professor at Georgetown University, using racially charged language to describe black conservative figures and making disparaging comments about his colleagues. The footage was captured during what Franklin believed was a private date.

Franklin, set to begin teaching journalistic techniques at Georgetown in January 2026, was formerly a correspondent for NPR, where his reporting focused on race, culture, and justice. The hidden camera footage shows him referring to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas with a racial slur, calling him "the biggest coon of them all." Conservative commentator Candace Owens was also targeted in the conversation, labeled as "annoying" and "another coon." Franklin accused these figures of betraying their principles for the benefit of white men, branding Owens a "sellout."

The video also captures Franklin's views on his university colleagues, whom he described as "stupid white people." During the conversation, O'Keefe encouraged Franklin to share these opinions publicly, to which Franklin responded that doing so would require him to give up his journalism career to say what he "really wants to say."

The reveal of Franklin's identity led to a physical altercation, where he made contact with a cameraman from the O'Keefe Media Group and subsequently fell to the ground while trying to leave the scene. This incident, along with the content of the recorded conversation, has raised questions about the ethical implications for Franklin's upcoming course on journalistic techniques.

O'Keefe took to social media to point out the irony of Franklin's role as an educator who is responsible for teaching effective interviewing skills, contrasting it with his private conduct and use of language that goes against journalistic ethics. Georgetown University has yet to release a statement regarding Franklin's comments or his employment status following the release of the footage.

The video has sparked a debate about the responsibility of educators and journalists in maintaining professional conduct and the impact of private beliefs on public responsibilities. The incident underscores the broader conversation about the intersection of personal views and professional obligations, especially for those in influential positions.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The case of Jonathan Franklin's private remarks captured on video brings to light systemic issues within academia and the media that warrant a progressive analysis. The language used by Franklin, targeting black conservatives, is indicative of a deeper problem of intolerance and discrimination that permeates our society. Progressives recognize the need to address these issues head-on, advocating for inclusive dialogue that challenges racism in all its forms.

The disparaging comments made about his colleagues reveal a disconnect between private beliefs and public responsibilities. For progressives, this is an opportunity to reflect on how systemic biases can affect even those who are part of marginalized communities themselves. It also shows the necessity for continuous learning and unlearning of prejudices, even among educators and journalists who are expected to be more aware of social issues.

Furthermore, this incident highlights the importance of accountability in positions of authority. Educators, particularly those teaching vital skills such as journalistic integrity, must be held to high standards to ensure they contribute positively to the collective well-being of the community. Progressive values emphasize the need for systemic change that upholds equity and justice, which includes creating environments where educators and media professionals are reflective of the diversity and values they are meant to represent.

Conservative View

The revelations about Jonathan Franklin, an educator tasked with imparting journalistic techniques to the next generation, are deeply concerning from a conservative standpoint. The use of racially charged language to describe individuals based on their political beliefs undermines the principles of free speech and thought that are foundational to a democratic society. Conservatives advocate for a marketplace of ideas where discourse is conducted with respect, and individuals are judged on their merits, not their race or political alignment.

Moreover, Franklin's comments about his colleagues being "stupid white people" are indicative of a dismissive attitude towards intellectual diversity, which is at odds with the conservative value of fostering a robust and respectful exchange of ideas. The expectation is that a university professor should embody the principles of fairness and integrity that they teach, especially in a field as influential as journalism.

The incident also raises questions about the role of universities as bastions of varied perspectives and the importance of upholding a standard of professionalism among educators. From a conservative perspective, it's paramount that those in positions of influence maintain personal responsibility and demonstrate a commitment to intellectual honesty and ethical conduct. Franklin's apparent duplicity between his public role and private opinions is a betrayal of the trust placed in him as an educator and a journalist.

Common Ground

In the wake of the recent incident involving Georgetown University adjunct professor Jonathan Franklin, there is common ground to be found in the universal condemnation of the use of derogatory language. Both conservative and progressive viewpoints agree that educators and journalists hold a responsibility to maintain a level of professionalism and ethical conduct that aligns with their societal roles.

There is also a shared understanding that the integrity of academic institutions and the media is paramount. Ensuring that the individuals within these professions adhere to standards of respect and impartiality is a goal that transcends political divides. The commitment to a fair and unbiased approach in education and reporting is a principle that both sides can support.

Additionally, there is a consensus on the importance of dialogue and the free exchange of ideas within a democratic society. Encouraging an environment where diverse perspectives can be shared and debated in a respectful manner is essential for fostering understanding and growth. A focus on collaborative efforts to reinforce these values within educational and journalistic practices can lead to a more harmonious and informed public discourse.