Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-IL) has come under intense scrutiny after expressing at a summit in Mexico City that she considers herself "a proud Guatemalan before I'm an American." The controversial statement was made during the second annual Panamerican Congress, an event attended by progressive legislators from throughout the Americas, including members of the so-called "Squad."
Ramirez's remarks, delivered in Spanish, have ignited a firestorm of criticism, prompting accusations of divided loyalties. Calls for her resignation or expulsion from Congress have surged online, with some even demanding she be stripped of her U.S. citizenship and removed from her position on the House Homeland Security Committee. Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN) has been vocal in advocating for these measures.
The Panamerican Congress, known for its leftist leanings, included discussions that accused the United States of "imperialism" and a propensity for war, according to Ramirez's speech. These comments have only fueled the backlash from Republican lawmakers and conservative media outlets.
The White House has not remained silent on the issue. Spokesperson Liz Huston criticized the Democrats' comments as "despicable," contrasting them with efforts by President Trump to advance American interests.
Born in Chicago to Guatemalan immigrants, Ramirez has been open about her immigrant roots. Her husband is a DACA recipient, and she has been an outspoken proponent of immigration reform and DREAMer advocacy. This personal background, coupled with her recent comments, has raised concerns among critics regarding her prioritization of U.S. interests.
The Daily Caller and RedState have both confirmed Ramirez's statement through analysis of the Spanish-language content. Her attendance at the summit and her commitment to leftist international cooperation have sparked a debate about the balance between global advocacy and legislative responsibility to U.S. constituents.
As the fallout from her statement continues, Ramirez's position has become emblematic of the tension between national identity and global solidarity. Her case illustrates the growing debate around allegiance and the role of elected officials in a globalized political landscape.
