Sponsor Advertisement
HHS Secretary Kennedy Calls for Ban on Gas Station Drug 7-OH Citing Addiction Risks

HHS Secretary Kennedy Calls for Ban on Gas Station Drug 7-OH Citing Addiction Risks

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. advocates for the ban of 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH), a compound in kratom, due to its opioid-like properties and high addiction potential. The DEA is reviewing the proposal for scheduling the substance.

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has taken a firm stance against the sale of a potentially dangerous substance found in gas stations and smoke shops nationwide. During a press conference on Tuesday, Kennedy, alongside FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, announced a push to classify 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH), a compound present in kratom leaves, as a Schedule I drug. This classification would place 7-OH amongst substances considered to have a high potential for abuse and no accepted medical use.

Kennedy’s call to action comes amidst concerns that 7-OH, which is being marketed in various forms such as drinks, gummies, and powders, could lead to a "fourth wave of opioid addiction." The substance binds to the mu receptor in the brain, an action characteristic of opioids, making it scientifically an opioid, as per FDA Commissioner Makary’s statement. Makary highlighted the compound's potency, noting it is 13 times more potent than morphine.

The announcement, covered by the Daily Mail, underscored the urgency of addressing the issue to prevent a repeat of the opioid crises of the 1990s and 2010s. Kennedy, drawing from personal experience, stressed the role of availability in sparking addiction. His aim is to cut off access to 7-OH before it precipitates a crisis similar to the one he faced.

Makary clarified that the government's focus is not kratom itself but the synthetic, concentrated by-product 7-OH. The DEA's review of HHS's recommendation to schedule the drug is expected to be fast-tracked, potentially taking up to six months, followed by a public comment period of 30 to 60 days.

Deputy HHS Secretary Jim O’Neill accused the industry of marketing 7-OH deceptively, targeting vulnerable populations such as young people, veterans, and chronic pain sufferers with the guise of safe alternatives. Attorney General Pam Bondi supported this stance with data showing a correlation between vape and smoke shops and rising overdose deaths.

Products like the "Feel Free" tonic have become notorious for their immediate effects, leading to a quick buzz followed by reports of dependency. The HHS has noted an increase in emergency room visits related to 7-OH, predominantly involving young adults, chronic pain sufferers, and veterans.

Kennedy and Makary warned that without intervention, the U.S. could face another addiction epidemic, this time fueled by a legally sold substance. RFK Jr. condemned the industry as "SINISTER," highlighting the personal and societal risks posed by 7-OH.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

From a progressive perspective, the health and well-being of the public are paramount. The call to ban 7-OH by HHS Secretary Kennedy is aligned with the progressive value of ensuring a safe environment for all citizens, particularly those who are most vulnerable to the predatory practices of an unregulated market.

Progressives advocate for evidence-based policy decisions and would support the scheduling of 7-OH if scientific research shows it poses significant risks akin to those of opioids. It is crucial that the government takes proactive measures to prevent another public health crisis, learning from the devastating impacts of past opioid epidemics.

Additionally, progressives would emphasize the need for comprehensive education on substance abuse and accessible treatment options for those struggling with addiction. While regulation is necessary, it must be accompanied by support services that address the root causes of addiction, such as mental health issues, economic distress, and social isolation.

Conservative View

The conservative stance on the issue of 7-OH is one of caution and the need for law and order. The potential scheduling of 7-OH by the DEA is a necessary step to prevent another opioid crisis, which would be detrimental to the fabric of American society. The government has a responsibility to protect its citizens from substances that pose significant health risks, especially those that can lead to addiction and abuse.

The conservative policy approach emphasizes personal responsibility and the rule of law. However, when a substance is as potent and dangerous as 7-OH appears to be, it is incumbent upon the government to step in and regulate or ban such substances. The marketing of 7-OH as a safe alternative to painkillers or as a productivity booster is deceptive and preys on the vulnerable, including our veterans and young people. It is imperative that these deceptive practices are stopped and that the purveyors of such substances are held accountable.

Furthermore, the conservative viewpoint recognizes the importance of a strong family unit and community support systems in combating addiction. By removing 7-OH from the market, we are not only preventing potential harm to individuals but also protecting families and communities from the ripple effects of addiction.

Common Ground

Both conservative and progressive viewpoints can agree on the importance of protecting public health and preventing another opioid crisis. There is a shared understanding that substances with high potential for abuse and addiction should be regulated to safeguard individuals and communities. Furthermore, both sides recognize the need for accurate information and education on the risks associated with 7-OH to prevent deceptive marketing practices. Ultimately, there is a mutual desire to ensure that any government action is rooted in scientific evidence and the well-being of the populace.