Sponsor Advertisement
American Eagle's "Great Genes" Campaign Sparks Online Controversy

American Eagle's "Great Genes" Campaign Sparks Online Controversy

American Eagle's new ad featuring Sydney Sweeney has ignited debate for its "genes" versus "jeans" wordplay. Critics accuse the campaign of promoting racist undertones, with some drawing parallels to Nazi propaganda.

American Eagle Outfitters debuted a new advertising campaign in mid-2025, starring actress Sydney Sweeney, known for her role in HBO's "Euphoria". The campaign, which includes multiple video spots, presents a pun on "genes" as in heredity, and "jeans" as in the denim product the brand is known for. In one video, Sweeney crosses out "genes" on a billboard and replaces it with "jeans," while a voiceover praises her "great jeans."

Despite the attempt at humor, the campaign has provoked a backlash on social media platforms like TikTok, where users have accused the brand of insensitivity and promoting racist undertones. Critics argue that the ad's emphasis on Sweeney's "white, blue-eyed appearance" and "great genes" echoes narratives of racial superiority and aligns with ideologies reminiscent of Nazi propaganda.

The controversy has been fueled by a series of TikTok videos, including one by Angie VM Marketing, who described the campaign as "one of the loudest and most obvious racialized dog whistles we've seen and heard in a while." The debate has expanded quickly, with numerous posts and videos expressing concern over the campaign's messaging.

The New York Post reported that the conversation around the ad unfolded rapidly over a weekend, generating significant online engagement. Sweeney herself has not publicly responded to the controversy. This is not the first time Sweeney has been at the center of a cultural debate. In 2024, her appearance on "Saturday Night Live" and the subsequent media response sparked discussions about body image and cultural standards.

Columnist Bridget Phetasy's piece in The Spectator, "Boobs Are Back," which celebrated Sweeney's look, was met with criticism for allegedly promoting harmful biases. The current ad campaign controversy seems to be a continuation of the scrutiny surrounding Sweeney's public image and the cultural messages it conveys.

The campaign's fallout highlights the complexities of advertising in a socially and politically charged environment. Brands are increasingly held accountable for the subtext of their messaging, and as American Eagle has discovered, what may be intended as clever marketing can quickly become a source of heated public debate.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The controversy surrounding American Eagle's latest ad campaign is a testament to the need for greater sensitivity and diversity in advertising. The play on words between "genes" and "jeans" may seem innocuous to some, but to many others, it evokes a painful history of eugenics and white supremacy. In a time when racial tensions are high, it is irresponsible for brands to ignore the implications of their messaging.

The progressive stance calls for an inclusive approach to marketing—one that considers the potential impact on all demographics. It is not enough to dismiss concerns as overreactions; instead, we must listen to and learn from the experiences of marginalized communities. The backlash against the ad highlights a broader issue: the lack of diversity in decision-making spaces. When marketing teams lack diverse perspectives, they become blind to the nuances of their campaigns' reception among different audiences.

Moreover, the progressive viewpoint emphasizes the importance of accountability. Brands like American Eagle have a responsibility to promote positive social values and to avoid perpetuating harmful stereotypes. In the wake of this controversy, it is crucial for American Eagle to acknowledge the criticism, engage in meaningful dialogue with concerned parties, and take steps to ensure that future campaigns are culturally sensitive and inclusive.

Conservative View

The recent uproar over American Eagle's advertising campaign featuring Sydney Sweeney is a clear example of the left's hypersensitivity and eagerness to find offense where none is intended. The ad's wordplay between "genes" and "jeans" is a harmless marketing strategy, a clever pun that has been used in advertising for decades. Accusations that the campaign promotes racist undertones or Nazi-related imagery are unfounded and reflect a troubling trend towards the demonization of innocent expressions of humor and creativity.

It is essential to recognize that not every mention of genetics, even in jest, is a nod to dark historical ideologies. To suggest that an ad celebrating a popular actress's appeal is akin to fascist propaganda is to trivialize the real horrors of history. Furthermore, the immediate leap to condemn the campaign as racist ignores the individual's merit and the universal appeal of the product.

The conservative viewpoint values the freedom of speech and expression, including in commercial endeavors. While sensitivity to historical context is important, we must also be wary of a culture that too quickly imposes censorship and stigmatizes artistic license. Businesses should be free to engage their audience with wit without fear of being unjustly labeled or boycotted.

Common Ground

Despite the divergent perspectives on American Eagle's campaign, there is common ground to be found in the recognition of the importance of intention and impact in advertising. Both conservatives and progressives can agree that the freedom of expression is vital, but so is the need for responsible messaging that does not inadvertently perpetuate harmful ideologies. There is also a shared understanding that diversity within creative teams can lead to better, more universally accepted campaigns. Moving forward, finding a balance between creative expression and cultural sensitivity should be a goal that transcends political divides.