Sponsor Advertisement
Tulsi Gabbard Accuses Obama-Era Officials of Anti-Trump Coup

Tulsi Gabbard Accuses Obama-Era Officials of Anti-Trump Coup

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard alleges that Obama-era officials plotted a coup against President Trump. She claims deep state actors hindered the release of information about the Trump-Russia collusion narrative, demanding truth and accountability.

In a recent interview with Fox News host Jesse Watters, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard made explosive allegations against officials from the Obama administration. Gabbard accused them of orchestrating a "years-long coup" against President Donald Trump following his victory in the 2016 presidential election. She highlighted the challenges posed by "deep state obstacles" that impeded the dissemination of information regarding the Trump-Russia collusion allegations, which she referred to as a hoax.

The National Intelligence director emphasized that certain individuals within the intelligence community were opposed to the release of such information, preferring to keep it hidden from public scrutiny. "There are a lot of deep state actors still here within Washington. President Trump wants us to find the truth. I want to find that truth," Gabbard stated during the interview.

Gabbard praised the recent actions of Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Department of Justice in their efforts to address these concerns. "The American people deserve the truth, and they deserve accountability, which is why I'm really glad to see that Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Department of Justice announced the creation of a strike force team today," she added. This team is tasked with examining the intelligence and evidence collected and determining the appropriate course of action to ensure accountability.

On July 18, Gabbard took to a viral X thread to explain how the Obama administration attempted to subvert "the will of the American people." She argued that, according to the intelligence community's consensus in 2016, Russia lacked the capability to hack the U.S. election. However, she noted that the narrative seemed to shift after Trump's election win.

Gabbard pointed to a December 8, 2016, intelligence assessment prepared for the President's Daily Brief which concluded that Russia "did not impact recent U.S. election results" by conducting cyber-attacks on infrastructure. The assessment was never published, as it was withdrawn "based on new guidance" before reaching the President.

A spokesperson for former President Barack Obama dismissed Gabbard's claims as "bizarre" and "outrageous," maintaining that the intelligence community's findings regarding Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential election remain valid. These conclusions were supported by a 2020 bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report, chaired by then-Senator Marco Rubio.

In 2020, Rubio released a statement detailing the findings of the Senate Intelligence Committee, which found no evidence of collusion between Trump and Russia during the 2016 election. Although the committee concluded that Russia did not "hack" the election, it did acknowledge Kremlin meddling. "The Committee found that the Russian government engaged in an aggressive, multi-faceted effort to influence, or attempt to influence, the outcome of the 2016 presidential election," Rubio stated.

Gabbard's interview has stirred significant controversy and debate regarding the integrity of the intelligence community and the political motivations behind the Trump-Russia collusion narrative. As the story unfolds, the American public is left to ponder the implications of these allegations and the potential impact on trust in governmental institutions.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

While the accusations made by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard are serious and warrant scrutiny, the progressive viewpoint urges caution against jumping to conclusions without comprehensive evidence. Progressives believe in the importance of safeguarding democratic institutions and the integrity of elections. However, they also stress the need to avoid unfounded conspiracy theories that can erode public trust in these very institutions.

It is essential to distinguish between legitimate concerns about foreign interference in elections and unfounded claims of a "deep state" coup. Progressives point to the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report, which confirmed Russian meddling in the 2016 election, as evidence that concerns about foreign influence are not baseless. The focus should be on protecting future elections from foreign interference, regardless of which party it may benefit or harm.

Moreover, progressives argue for the importance of accountability and the rule of law. If there is verifiable evidence of misconduct by any officials, it should be addressed through the appropriate legal channels. However, it is equally important to ensure that such investigations are not used as political tools to target opponents. The progressive viewpoint values the pursuit of truth through a fair and just process.

Conservative View

The allegations brought forth by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard are a vindication of what many conservatives have long suspected: that there was a concerted effort by Obama-era officials to undermine President Trump's administration. The notion of a "deep state" working against a democratically elected president is alarming and strikes at the heart of our republic's principles. The creation of a strike force team by Attorney General Pam Bondi is a step in the right direction, as it signals a commitment to uncovering the truth and holding those responsible accountable.

The conservative perspective emphasizes the importance of transparency and the rule of law. The alleged actions of these officials, if proven true, represent a grave breach of trust and an affront to the democratic process. It is critical that the intelligence community operates free from political bias to maintain credibility. Furthermore, the media's role in perpetuating the collusion narrative without sufficient evidence has also been a source of concern for conservatives, who often view the mainstream media with skepticism.

The conservative viewpoint is clear: the American people deserve to know if their government officials have engaged in activities that compromise the integrity of the nation's electoral system. This is not just about President Trump; it is about ensuring that no future president faces such subversive tactics. The pursuit of truth and the enforcement of justice must prevail over partisan politics.

Common Ground

Both conservatives and progressives can agree on the fundamental importance of election integrity and the rule of law. The need for transparency in government operations and the intelligence community is a shared value that transcends party lines. Both sides also concur that any foreign interference in elections is unacceptable and that measures should be taken to prevent such occurrences in the future. Lastly, there is a mutual interest in ensuring that government officials are held accountable for their actions, and that any investigations into misconduct are conducted fairly and impartially.