In an unprecedented show of bipartisanship, former Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama have voiced their disapproval of President Donald Trump's recent decision to close the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). This rare critique from past presidents underscores the gravity of the situation as USAID, known for its significant humanitarian work across the globe, faces its end.
The criticism emerged through a private farewell video, obtained by the Associated Press, shown to USAID staff as the agency was officially phased out. George W. Bush, who initiated pivotal programs against AIDS and HIV during his presidency, praised the agency's efforts, which have saved an estimated 25 million lives over two decades. He emphasized the "strength of America" through the compassion demonstrated by USAID employees. Barack Obama referred to the closure as "a travesty" and "a tragedy," warning that it was a "colossal mistake" with potentially far-reaching consequences.
The decision to dismantle USAID was driven by Trump and Elon Musk's new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which aims to streamline federal operations. They argue that the agency had become inefficient and bloated, contributing to global instability and anti-American sentiments. As the responsibilities of USAID are transferred to the U.S. State Department, many employees find themselves jobless, and the future of America's role in global humanitarian efforts remains uncertain.
The farewell video also featured U2 frontman Bono, who has been an outspoken critic of Trump. Bono delivered a poignant poem mourning the loss of the agency, lauding the staff as the "best of us," in stark contrast to the accusations of them being "crooks." Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton joined the chorus, commending the dedication of USAID workers and their contributions to global safety.
Despite their generally low profile in commenting on Trump's policies, Bush and Obama's engagement at the inaugural event earlier this year indicated their continued interest in national affairs. On the other side of the debate, Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended the closure, pointing to the need for more strategic delivery of foreign aid through the State Department, marking an end to "government-sanctioned inefficiency."
The controversy over USAID's closure reflects broader discussions on the role of American leadership and the efficacy of its humanitarian efforts abroad. With both praise for the agency's past achievements and criticism of its recent performance, the legacy of USAID and the future of U.S. foreign aid are at a pivotal juncture.
