Sponsor Advertisement
Apple Considering Price Hikes for iPhone 17 Lineup This Fall
AI generated image of the iPhone 17. Particular LLC.

Apple Considering Price Hikes for iPhone 17 Lineup This Fall

Apple is considering raising prices for its upcoming iPhone 17 models, planning to justify the increases through new features and design changes rather than blaming tariffs, even as the US and China agree to temporarily reduce trade levies while maintaining a 20% tariff on Chinese-made electronics.

Tech giant Apple is reportedly weighing a plan to increase prices for its upcoming iPhone 17 models set to release this fall, according to people familiar with the matter. The company aims to pair these potential price hikes with new features and design changes rather than attributing them to U.S. tariffs on goods imported from China where most iPhones are manufactured.

The Wall Street Journal first reported on Monday that Apple wants to avoid linking any price increases directly to tariffs, instead focusing on new design elements like the rumored ultra-thin iPhone 17 Air model as justification for higher prices. This strategy comes after the White House recently criticized Amazon for considering showing the impact of tariffs on consumer prices, calling it a "hostile political act."

The news emerged on the same day the United States and China announced a temporary 90-day reduction in reciprocal tariffs. Under the new agreement, the U.S. will lower tariffs on Chinese goods from 145% to 30%, while China will cut its levies from 125% to 10%. However, a 20% tariff implemented by President Trump earlier this year on Chinese imports, including smartphones, remains in place.

"The people familiar with the supply chain said Apple would have trouble making up for China tariff costs solely by seeking further savings from its suppliers, meaning a hit to its profit margin was likely unless it could raise prices," the Wall Street Journal reported.

Apple CEO Tim Cook has taken steps to mitigate tariff impacts by shifting more iPhone production to India. During the company's latest earnings call, Cook indicated that Indian-made iPhones are expected to account for the majority of devices shipped to the U.S. in the second quarter. He also revealed that Apple expected current tariff policies to generate $900 million in additional costs this quarter alone, with higher expenses projected to continue if tariffs aren't reduced further.

Despite these efforts, sources familiar with Apple's supply chain suggest that the company's most profitable Pro and Pro Max models will continue to be manufactured primarily in China, as facilities in India aren't yet equipped to support mass production at the same scale.

Analysts have previously estimated that if Apple were to pass on the full cost of tariffs to consumers, prices could increase dramatically. CFRA Research analyst Angelo Zino suggested the company might struggle to increase consumer costs more than 5% to 10%, while more pessimistic projections from Rosenblatt Securities indicated Apple would need to hike iPhone prices by as much as 43% to fully offset tariff costs.

The potential price increases come at a time when Apple's stock has been negatively impacted by trade tensions. Shares plummeted nearly 20% after Trump's tariff announcements in early April, wiping out nearly $640 billion in market value. However, following Monday's news of reduced tariffs, Apple's shares rebounded, rising 7% in premarket trading.

Apple has not commented publicly on the reports of planned price increases. The company typically unveils its new iPhone models in September, giving executives several months to finalize pricing decisions as they monitor the evolving trade situation and market conditions.

Current iPhone models range from the base iPhone 16 starting at $799 to the iPhone 16 Pro Max at $1,199. The upcoming iPhone 17 lineup is rumored to include significant updates, including an all-new ultra-thin iPhone 17 Air that would replace the Plus model in Apple's lineup, as well as increased RAM to support new artificial intelligence features.

Sources: The Wall Street Journal, Reuters, Fox Business, MacRumors, Bloomberg, CNBC

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The looming iPhone price increases expose how tariffs function as a hidden tax on American consumers rather than affecting foreign manufacturers. Apple's reluctance to directly attribute price hikes to tariffs demonstrates the political sensitivity around this regressive policy that disproportionately impacts middle-class consumers who depend on affordable technology for work, education, and connectivity.

The rushed transition to manufacturing in countries like India raises serious concerns about labor standards, environmental protections, and quality control as production shifts to facilities that lack China's decades of manufacturing expertise. Rather than forcing hasty supply chain disruptions through punitive tariffs, a more sustainable approach would involve carefully constructed trade agreements with enforceable standards for workers' rights, environmental protection, and intellectual property across all manufacturing locations. The temporary tariff reduction reveals the administration's recognition that their initial approach was economically damaging, yet maintaining any tariffs during high inflation unnecessarily burdens American families already struggling with elevated prices on essential goods and services.

Conservative View

President Trump's strategic use of tariffs is successfully pressuring America's largest companies to reconsider their excessive reliance on Chinese manufacturing. Apple's move to shift production to India demonstrates that market incentives work better than government mandates in reshoring critical supply chains. The company's reluctance to blame tariffs for price increases reveals their understanding that American consumers expect companies to prioritize national security over mere profit maximization.

With security concerns about Chinese technology growing daily, Apple investors and consumers should welcome the short-term price adjustments as a necessary cost of reducing dependency on a hostile foreign power. Cook's strategic shift of production to India aligns with broader American interests in strengthening ties with democratic allies rather than enriching authoritarian regimes. The administration's willingness to negotiate temporary tariff reductions shows a balanced approach that maintains pressure while allowing businesses reasonable time to adapt their supply chains, proving that Trump's "America First" economic policy delivers tangible results without unduly burdening consumers or businesses committed to national priorities.

Common Ground

Both conservatives and progressives can agree that diversifying America's technology supply chain beyond a single country represents sound long-term strategy, regardless of how it's achieved. The global semiconductor shortage during the pandemic demonstrated the fragility of concentrated manufacturing and the need for resilient, distributed production capabilities for critical technologies.

All Americans benefit from transparent pricing policies where companies clearly communicate the factors driving cost increases rather than obscuring them. Regardless of political affiliation, consumers deserve honest information about what they're paying for and why prices change. Additionally, both sides recognize that American technology leadership depends on maintaining high standards for product quality, security, and innovation regardless of where devices are manufactured. The eventual reduction of trade tensions through negotiated agreements that address legitimate concerns while minimizing economic disruption serves the interests of businesses, workers, and consumers across the political spectrum.