Sponsor Advertisement
NC Rep. von Haefen Faces Backlash for Sharing Violent Trump Image

NC Rep. von Haefen Faces Backlash for Sharing Violent Trump Image

North Carolina Democratic Rep. Julie von Haefen is under scrutiny for a social media post depicting a guillotine with President Trump's effigy, leading to calls for her resignation amid accusations of inciting violence.

North Carolina Democratic Representative Julie von Haefen has become the center of a political firestorm after she shared a graphic image on social media that appeared to endorse violence against former President Donald Trump. The image, revealed during the "No Kings" protest in Raleigh on June 15, 2025, depicted a bloody guillotine with a prop that symbolized a decapitated Trump, accompanied by a sign stating, "In these difficult times, some cuts may be necessary."

The post, which praised the turnout of the protest, prompted immediate and fierce criticism from Republican lawmakers and conservative commentators throughout the state. Rep. von Haefen removed the image from a video she posted but stopped short of issuing an apology. In a Facebook statement, she declared, "I condemn political violence in all forms," and stressed her dedication to unity, referencing recent violence in Minnesota that resulted in the death of a state legislator and her spouse.

However, critics were quick to point out the discrepancy between von Haefen's statement and her initial endorsement of the protest, underscored by her use of hashtags supportive of the "No Kings" movement. Republican Rep. Erin Paré condemned von Haefen, stating, "This is a sitting state legislator who is publicly applauding the beheading of President Trump just hours after a state legislator and her spouse were murdered in cold blood." The Republican Party of North Carolina demanded that political violence "should be condemned, not encouraged."

The controversy has put top state leaders, including Democratic Governor Josh Stein, House Speaker Destin Hall, and Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Berger, in the spotlight for their silence on the matter. Meanwhile, von Haefen, a three-term lawmaker and certified Guardian ad Litem with law licenses in multiple states, has been known for her community involvement and advocacy.

The "No Kings" protests have been staged nationwide, partly in response to President Trump's celebration of the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary. With more than 1,700 reported protests, including 27 in North Carolina, the movement has garnered significant attention. The Democratic Party, which has previously supported policies like federal vaccine mandates and school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic, has now found itself embroiled in this contentious issue as it prepares for the upcoming election season.

In the 2024 election, Trump achieved a decisive victory, casting a spotlight on the current political climate and the actions of political figures like von Haefen. The North Carolina Democratic Party, rather than addressing von Haefen's post directly, issued a general statement condemning politically motivated violence. At the same time, von Haefen's social media presence has become a focal point, with her account on platform X now deleted.

Amid heightened national tensions following a series of politically motivated violent incidents, the calls for accountability from elected officials have intensified. Many argue that leaders should steer clear of any communication that could be construed as endorsing violence, advocating for a more civil and respectful political discourse.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The incident involving Rep. Julie von Haefen's social media post raises important questions about the intersection of free speech and the responsible conduct of our political representatives. While progressives staunchly defend the right to protest and express dissent, it is critical to differentiate between constructive political discourse and rhetoric that could potentially incite violence.

The image shared by von Haefen, seen in the context of the "No Kings" protests, undoubtedly carries a message of strong opposition to former President Trump's policies and actions. However, given the recent violent events that have shaken our nation, it is paramount that we approach our advocacy with a mindfulness of the potential repercussions that certain symbols and language may have on our collective well-being.

As progressives, we should strive to foster an environment where systemic change can be pursued through peaceful and inclusive means. The goal should be to empower communities and create equitable opportunities for all individuals, while simultaneously ensuring that our political climate does not become toxically polarized.

This incident serves as a reminder of the need for a balanced approach to political activism, one that does not compromise on the urgency of addressing social justice issues but also respects the principles of non-violence and empathy. It is incumbent upon leaders to set an example and guide the public discourse in a direction that promotes systemic reform without resorting to or endorsing violent imagery.

Conservative View

The recent actions of North Carolina Democratic Rep. Julie von Haefen represent a dangerous departure from the core principles that undergird our republic. The sharing of a graphic image depicting a guillotine and a decapitated effigy of President Trump is abhorrent and unbecoming of an elected official. It undermines the values of individual liberty and due process that conservatives hold dear.

This behavior is symptomatic of a broader issue within the political left – a willingness to condone or overlook violent imagery and rhetoric when it serves their ideological ends. This double standard is unacceptable. It is imperative to uphold the rule of law and ensure that all public discourse, especially from our leaders, remains firmly anchored in respect for individual rights and the peaceful transition of power.

Representative von Haefen's post, which came shortly after a tragic act of violence that took the lives of a fellow legislator and her husband, is particularly egregious. It contradicts the notion of personal responsibility and the conservative belief in a limited government that fosters a safe and stable society. Public officials should promote unity and constructive dialogue, not incite division through callous and inflammatory statements.

Furthermore, the lack of immediate and unequivocal condemnation from other Democratic leaders sends a worrying message about their commitment to civility and their stance against political violence. It is essential for all parties to unequivocally reject any form of violence as a political tool and to hold their members accountable when they fail to do so.

Common Ground

In the wake of Rep. Julie von Haefen's controversial post, there is a palpable opportunity for bipartisan dialogue on the responsible use of rhetoric and imagery by elected officials. Both conservatives and progressives can agree that the sanctity of our democratic processes and the safety of our public servants are paramount and should be protected from any form of violence or incitement thereof.

There is a shared value in maintaining a political environment where vigorous debate does not descend into personal attacks or threats. Regardless of political affiliation, there is consensus that the core tenets of respect, civility, and the peaceful expression of differing viewpoints are essential to the health of our democracy.

Finding common ground on these principles can pave the way for constructive reforms that enhance the accountability of public figures and protect the integrity of our political institutions. A collaborative approach to condemning and preventing political violence can fortify our commitment to a more united and resilient society.