Sponsor Advertisement
DOJ Sues Idaho Town for Alleged Religious Discrimination in Zoning

DOJ Sues Idaho Town for Alleged Religious Discrimination in Zoning

The DOJ has filed a lawsuit against Troy, Idaho, claiming the town violated the RLUIPA by denying Christ Church a permit to operate in a commercial zone.

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has initiated legal action against the small town of Troy, Idaho, on allegations that the municipality contravened federal law by impeding an evangelical church from occupying its preferred place of worship. The DOJ's lawsuit, filed on May 20, asserts that Troy's rebuff of a conditional use permit for Christ Church is in breach of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA).

Established in 2000, RLUIPA prohibits local governments from discriminating against religious assemblies in a manner that is more unfavorable than comparable secular entities. Despite Troy's downtown C-1 commercial zone being open to clubs, museums, auditoriums, and art galleries, the lawsuit claims that Christ Church was unjustifiably barred from the district.

The conflict arose when church elder Matt Meyer bought a vacant bank building in November 2022 with the intention of dividing the space between religious services and a community event area. Meyer's application underscored the potential for property-tax revenue and posited that weekend services would not significantly impact local commerce, according to Fox News.

However, during a March public hearing, residents expressed concerns regarding traffic, parking scarcity, and discomfort with the conservative views of Douglas Wilson, a senior pastor at the church. Subsequently, the Troy City Council denied the request, stating the church did not enhance the commercial district's vitality and posed a strain on the town's population, which is less than 1,000.

The DOJ's legal challenge questions these justifications, noting that the city permits nonreligious events that attract comparable crowds and parking issues. The complaint points out that Troy conducted no traffic studies and did not attempt to negotiate to alleviate concerns, such as restricting service times or reserving parking.

Moreover, the DOJ cited public comments that revealed bias and discrimination against Christ Church and its members based on religious beliefs. The lawsuit accuses Troy of imposing a "substantial burden" on the church's religious exercise and of treating it differently than secular assemblies.

This lawsuit follows the recent formation of an anti-Christian bias task force by Attorney General Pam Bondi, as part of a DOJ effort to address discrimination against Christian entities. This task force, as reported by Resist the Mainstream, underscores a larger initiative to combat perceived nationwide anti-Christian bias.

Troy's attorney, Todd Richardson, labeled the DOJ's actions as "bullying tactics," highlighting that Christ Church has been conducting services in the building for two years during the DOJ investigation without complaints. He emphasized the need to maintain a commercial core in the town.

Douglas Wilson, known for his contentious writings and protests against mask mandates, asserted that his views should not influence the approval of a religious assembly. In April, Troy passed an interim zoning ordinance that excluded auditoriums, community centers, and places of worship from the C-1 district, effectively barring churches unless the code is revised.

The DOJ seeks declaratory relief, an injunction to permit Christ Church to use the building, and reimbursement of legal fees. Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Civil Rights Division highlighted the government's commitment to upholding religious freedom and vowed to challenge jurisdictions that discriminate based on religious beliefs.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

While it is essential to uphold religious freedoms, it is equally important to consider the balance between such freedoms and the maintenance of secular, commercial spaces. The decision by Troy's City Council to deny Christ Church a permit should be examined within the context of preserving the town's commercial district integrity. The concerns raised by residents, such as traffic and parking, are legitimate issues that affect the quality of life and should not be dismissed as discriminatory without thorough investigation.

However, the DOJ's lawsuit brings up valid points regarding the potential unequal treatment of religious assemblies compared to secular events. If similar secular gatherings are allowed within the same zone, then it warrants questioning why a church would be excluded, provided it adheres to the same standards and regulations.

The recent move to create an anti-Christian bias task force within the DOJ must be approached with caution. While it is crucial to combat discrimination, it is equally important to ensure that such a task force does not become a tool for privileging one religious viewpoint over others or for overlooking the separation of church and state.

Conservative View

The Department of Justice's lawsuit against Troy, Idaho is a rightful exercise of federal authority to ensure religious freedoms are protected. The RLUIPA was specifically enacted to prevent local governments from imposing discriminatory conditions on religious organizations. By rejecting Christ Church's permit without sufficient justification, Troy has not only disregarded federal law but has also shown a concerning pattern of religious bias.

Churches play a vital role in communities, often providing not just spiritual guidance but also social services and community building. The attempt to exclude Christ Church from the C-1 commercial zone reflects a broader issue of religious liberty infringement. It is crucial for the DOJ to take a firm stance against such violations, particularly when they stem from personal disagreements with religious teachings.

Furthermore, the recent establishment of an anti-Christian bias task force is a commendable step towards safeguarding the rights of Christian groups. Attorney General Pam Bondi's leadership in this area signals a necessary pushback against the gradual erosion of religious expression in the public square. The Troy case may well set a precedent, ensuring that religious organizations are treated on par with secular entities in land-use matters.

Common Ground

Both conservative and progressive perspectives agree on the fundamental importance of religious freedom as a cornerstone of American values. Ensuring that religious groups can find suitable places of worship without undue governmental interference is a principle that transcends political divides.

Moreover, there is a shared understanding that local governance must act fairly and equitably when it comes to zoning laws, whether they pertain to religious or secular organizations. Both sides can support the pursuit of a fair investigation into the allegations against Troy, with the outcome serving justice and the community's best interests.