Sponsor Advertisement
Book Claims Biden's Inner Circle Held Reins of Power

Book Claims Biden's Inner Circle Held Reins of Power

A new book alleges that a small group of unelected individuals, dubbed "the Politburo," exerted control over the Biden administration, raising concerns over democratic accountability.

Former President Joe Biden's administration has come under the spotlight with the release of a provocative new book detailing his presidency's internal dynamics. Titled "Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again," the book is authored by journalists Alex Thompson of Axios and CNN's Jake Tapper. The publication presents a contentious narrative suggesting that a small, unelected group effectively steered the White House during Biden's term.

The health of President Biden also entered public discourse last week as he received a diagnosis of advanced prostate cancer that had metastasized to his bones, a serious condition that typically signals a terminal phase. In an unexpected show of bipartisan compassion, former President Donald Trump issued supportive comments.

Thompson and Tapper's book, however, shifts focus back to political intrigue, alleging that individuals such as former White House Chief of Staff Ron Klain and members of Biden's family, including Jill Biden and Hunter Biden, were part of the so-called "Politburo" that managed presidential affairs. This term, historically associated with communist states' policy-making bodies, implies a concentration of power away from elected officials.

During an interview with PBS, Thompson suggested that this inner circle's influence was an open secret within the administration. The New York Post quotes him explaining the nomenclature used in the book, saying, "In terms of who was running the White House, it’s a small group of people that have been around. Some people within the administration called them the Politburo."

The authors assert that these figures, who had not received any electoral mandate, were responsible for significant decisions and daily operations. This situation raises substantial questions about the principles of democratic representation and constitutional governance. Tapper noted that President Biden was not entirely sidelined, stating, "Joe Biden himself also is part of this. Joe Biden is not like — it’s not ‘Weekend at Bernie’s,' right? He has some purchase here. He has some agency. And he’s aware of some of what’s going on."

The book goes on to describe how these aides might have justified their actions, considering Trump an "existential threat" to democracy. This belief seemingly allowed them to rationalize measures that might otherwise be deemed undemocratic. The Western Journal cites Tapper revealing, "He’s aware of the fact that they are keeping the cabinet away from him, they are keeping some White House staffers away from him."

A particularly damning allegation involves an anonymous aide's strategy for a potential second term for Biden, suggesting that he could serve merely as a figurehead. The aide was quoted as saying Biden "just had to win, and then he could disappear for four years," only providing "proof of life every once in a while."

Thompson expanded on these revelations in a Sunday interview with Fox News host Shannon Bream, discussing the implications of such an approach to governance. The notion that a sitting president might be a mere front for behind-the-scenes actors, never subjected to the scrutiny of an election or Senate confirmation, challenges the very concept of democratic accountability.

While the authors of "Original Sin" paint a picture of a presidency shadowed by manipulation and concealment, it is important to approach these claims with a critical eye. The full impact of these allegations on the public's perception of the Biden administration and the broader political landscape remains to be seen.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

While the allegations in "Original Sin" are concerning, it's crucial to understand the context in which Biden's aides might have felt compelled to take extraordinary measures. If they genuinely perceived Trump as an existential threat to democracy, their actions, though undemocratic in nature, could be seen as an attempt to protect the nation from a greater harm.

However, this does not absolve the Biden administration from the responsibility to adhere to democratic principles. The balance between acting in the nation's best interest and maintaining democratic integrity is delicate. Even in times of perceived crisis, it's vital to uphold the values of representation and accountability.

What the book describes is a slippery slope that, if left unchecked, could erode public trust in democratic institutions. It's important for elected officials and their aides to remember that democracy thrives on transparency and the will of the people, not on the covert actions of a select few.

Conservative View

The revelations in "Original Sin" provide a stark warning about the erosion of democratic norms. The fact that unelected officials, referred to as "the Politburo," could exert such control over the executive branch is deeply troubling. This group's ability to operate without electoral legitimacy or Senate confirmation undermines the checks and balances that are fundamental to our constitutional republic.

The book's claims suggest a dangerous precedent where the ends justify the means, as long as the political opposition is viewed as a sufficient threat. It's essential to consider the long-term implications of such actions. If a precedent is set where unelected aides can steer the presidency, what prevents future administrations from further eroding democratic processes?

Moreover, the idea that a president could be a figurehead, with real power vested in a shadowy group, is antithetical to the principles of transparency and accountability that are cornerstones of American governance. This scenario could lead to a situation where policy decisions are made without public oversight or input, and where the electorate's voice is effectively silenced.

Common Ground

Both conservatives and progressives can agree that the health of our democracy depends on transparency and accountability. No matter the political climate or perceived threats, it is imperative that elected officials and their staff uphold the principles enshrined in the Constitution.

The idea that a small group of individuals could control the presidency without public mandate is alarming to all who value democratic governance. It's crucial to ensure that all actions taken by those in power are subject to scrutiny and that the electorate has a say in the direction of the country.