Sponsor Advertisement
President Trump Responds to D.C. National Guard Shooting Incident

President Trump Responds to D.C. National Guard Shooting Incident

President Trump calls for a review of Afghan nationals who entered the U.S. following a shooting by an Afghan Army veteran that left two National Guard soldiers critically injured.

On November 26, 2025, two National Guard soldiers were critically wounded in a shooting incident near Farragut West Metro station in downtown Washington, D.C. The suspect, identified as Rahmanullah Lakanwal, a former Afghan Army serviceman, allegedly targeted the soldiers in an attack that unfolded just blocks from the White House.

The shooting occurred shortly before 2:15 p.m., with reports indicating that Lakanwal fired upon the soldiers without provocation. One guardsman was shot while standing feet away, and the other was hit while seeking cover. Lakanwal, 29, was brought to the United States in September 2021 under Operation Allies Welcome, a program designed to resettle Afghans at risk after the American withdrawal from Afghanistan.

"The suspect in custody is a foreigner who entered our country from Afghanistan, a hellhole on earth," President Trump said. "He was flown in by the Biden administration in September 2021, on those infamous flights that everybody was talking about. Nobody knew who was coming in."

A relative of Lakanwal informed NBC that he had served alongside U.S. Special Forces for a decade and had sustained injuries in the line of duty. Lakanwal was settled in Bellingham, Washington, with his wife and five sons. In 2024, Lakanwal reportedly applied for asylum, which was granted in April 2025.

President Trump, in remarks on Wednesday night, focused his criticism on the Biden administration's handling of the evacuation process. He described the suspect as "a foreigner who entered our country from Afghanistan, a hellhole on earth," and condemned the 2021 evacuation flights for their lack of transparency and vetting. President Trump characterized the attack as "an act of evil, an act of hatred and an act of terror," and demanded a thorough review of all Afghan nationals who arrived in the U.S. during the Biden presidency.

Following the incident, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services suspended all immigration processes for Afghan nationals as security and vetting protocols are reassessed. The department emphasized the protection and safety of the American people as its primary mission.

Graphic images from the scene depicted a soldier receiving medical attention from a Secret Service agent. One of the injured guardsmen, identified as Andrew Wolfe of Inwood, West Virginia, was airlifted from the National Mall and remains in critical condition. A handgun believed to be used in the attack was recovered by the police. Despite being shot and hospitalized, the suspect Lakanwal is reportedly not cooperating with investigators.

The FBI, led by Director Kash Patel, has taken charge of the investigation, classifying it as an assault on federal officers. The FBI is collaborating with the Department of Homeland Security, Secret Service, ATF, and DEA in the ongoing investigation.

Social media reactions to the shooting have been polarized, with some expressing support for the injured soldiers while others, notably certain Antifa and leftist groups on Bluesky, have controversially celebrated the ambush.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

From a progressive standpoint, the shooting in Washington, D.C., raises deep concerns about the welfare and integration of refugees and immigrants, particularly those coming from war-torn regions. It is crucial to consider the social justice and equity implications of our refugee and asylum policies, ensuring that these individuals receive the support needed to adjust to a new society.

The plight of Afghan allies, like Lakanwal, who served alongside American forces, illustrates the complexity of immigration issues. While it is essential to safeguard against potential threats, we must also recognize the systemic challenges faced by refugees in accessing mental health services, community support, and assimilation assistance.

Environmental factors, such as the chaotic conditions of the Afghan withdrawal, likely contributed to the stress and trauma experienced by evacuees. A focus on collective well-being would suggest that our immigration policies incorporate comprehensive services to address these issues, preventing the marginalization that can lead to tragic outcomes.

The progressive view encourages community and governmental solutions that extend beyond stringent security measures, advocating for a balanced approach that upholds both the safety of our nation and the dignity of those seeking refuge.

Conservative View

From a conservative perspective, the tragic shooting of two National Guard soldiers by an Afghan national underscores the importance of rigorous vetting processes for individuals entering the United States. The emphasis on individual liberty and national security demands that we ensure the integrity of our immigration system to protect American citizens.

The resettlement of Afghan allies under Operation Allies Welcome was a humanitarian effort with noble intentions. However, the concern lies in the execution of this operation, which may have lacked the necessary scrutiny to prevent potential threats. This incident provides a stark reminder of the critical need for a limited but effective government that prioritizes the safety and security of its citizens.

Economic efficiency is also a pertinent issue in this context. Every individual admitted to the United States should contribute positively to society and not become a liability or a threat. This principle aligns with the conservative value of personal responsibility and the expectation that immigrants will integrate and add value to our nation.

The call by President Trump for a review of Afghan nationals who entered during the previous administration is a step toward reasserting control and ensuring that America's generosity does not compromise its security.

Common Ground

Both conservative and progressive viewpoints can find common ground in the desire to protect American lives while honoring the country's long-standing tradition of providing refuge to those in need. There is a shared recognition that thorough vetting processes are necessary to maintain national security, and both sides can agree on the importance of supporting immigrants and refugees once they are within our borders.

A bipartisan approach could involve enhancing vetting procedures while simultaneously investing in integration programs that help newcomers adapt and thrive in American society. By doing so, the country can not only prevent potential threats but also enrich its social fabric with the diverse contributions of immigrants who become productive members of the community.

Finding common ground means acknowledging the complexity of immigration issues and working collaboratively to create policies that are fair, effective, and compassionate.