Sponsor Advertisement
Pence's Notes Unveil Details of Pre-Riot Call With President Trump

Pence's Notes Unveil Details of Pre-Riot Call With President Trump

A new book discloses Mike Pence's handwritten notes from a tense conversation with President Trump before the Capitol events on January 6, 2021.

In a revelation set to stir the political discourse, a book by Jonathan Karl titled "Retribution: Donald Trump and the Campaign That Changed America," discloses the contents of handwritten notes by Mike Pence. These notes detail a conversation between Pence and President Donald Trump on January 6, 2021, just before the Capitol events unfolded.

The book, acting as a window into the administration's internal dynamics, shows President Trump's last-ditch effort to dissuade Pence from certifying the 2020 Presidential Election results. According to Pence's account, President Trump labeled him a "wimp" for not overturning the election results, suggesting regret for choosing him as Vice President five years prior.

This exchange occurred approximately one hour before President Trump's speech at the Save America rally. Later at the rally, the President emphasized the importance of a peaceful demonstration, stating, "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." He questioned the Republican party's resolve in upholding election integrity.

Pence's notes, now public, illustrate Trump expressing disappointment with the Vice President's advisors and accusing Pence of failing to protect the country. In retort, Pence referenced their shared constitutional responsibilities, asserting that upholding the law required courage, not breaking it.

The Daily Mail reported that Pence had previously referenced this conversation in his own memoir, "So Help Me God," timing the call at around 11 am, just before Trump addressed his supporters. The House January 6 committee also corroborated the account of Trump's "wimp" comment in 2022 through testimony from a White House official.

President Trump, while denying the use of the word "wimp" at a religious conservative gathering, expressed his disappointment in Pence's actions, likening him to others he considered weak for not taking a stand against the election results. He maintained that Pence had no choice but to certify the election results, even if he believed them to be fraudulent.

Special Counsel Jack Smith had intended to use Pence's notes as evidence in his cases against Trump, which were aimed at proving the President misled supporters in an attempt to overturn the election. However, following President Trump's victory in the 2024 election, these cases were dismissed.

Despite these developments, President Trump has consistently claimed that the 2020 election was unfairly biased against him, rallying thousands at the Save America event to support his cause. His speech at the Ellipse, where he urged his followers to "fight like hell," preceded the entrance of hundreds into the Capitol building.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The conversation between President Trump and Mike Pence, as revealed in the notes featured in Jonathan Karl's new book, highlights the essence of a democratic society—adherence to the rule of law and the peaceful transition of power. Progressives believe in the sanctity of each individual's vote, the cornerstone of equity and social justice within our electoral system. It is imperative that every voice is heard and that the will of the people is respected through fair and free elections.

The progressive viewpoint underscores the importance of protecting our democratic institutions from undue influence and preserving the checks and balances that prevent the concentration of power. The attempt to overturn certified election results strikes at the heart of these values and threatens the very foundation of our representative democracy.

Furthermore, a progressive analysis would consider systemic issues that may undermine the public's trust in our electoral system. It calls for comprehensive electoral reforms to enhance transparency, accessibility, and security in voting. Progressives advocate for the collective well-being, which is best served when leaders act with integrity and accountability.

Conservative View

The details of the conversation between President Trump and former Vice President Pence, as chronicled in Jonathan Karl's book, shed light on the constitutional responsibilities that lie at the heart of our republic. It is a fundamental conservative principle to uphold the rule of law and to respect the constitutional processes that govern our electoral system. From a conservative standpoint, the strength of our democracy hinges on the peaceful transfer of power, which is enshrined in our Constitution and has been a cornerstone of American governance for centuries.

The emphasis on individual liberty and limited government requires us to trust in our constitutional framework and the institutions that uphold it. Interference in the certification of election results could be seen as an overreach of executive power, which conservatives traditionally resist. The notion of personal responsibility extends to our elected officials, who must adhere to their oaths to protect and defend the Constitution, regardless of political pressures.

While conservatives may empathize with the frustration over the 2020 election outcome, it is paramount to channel such sentiments through legal and constitutional means. Ensuring election integrity is a critical concern and must be addressed through proper legislative processes, rather than executive fiat or pressure on individuals. Economic efficiency, a key conservative value, also relies on the stability and predictability that come from respecting the rule of law and democratic norms.

Common Ground

The information presented in Jonathan Karl's book, particularly the notes from Pence's conversation with President Trump, may serve as a rallying point for both conservatives and progressives to come together in defense of our constitutional democracy. Both sides value the rule of law and the importance of upholding the processes that ensure the legitimacy of our elections.

This shared respect for democratic norms could lead to a bipartisan effort to strengthen election security and voter confidence. Regardless of political affiliation, there is common ground in the belief that leaders must act in the nation's best interest, guided by the principles of the Constitution.

Collaborative discussions focused on election integrity may yield solutions that protect the sanctity of the vote while addressing concerns about election procedures. In doing so, America can uphold its tradition of peaceful power transitions, reinforcing its status as a beacon of democracy.