Sponsor Advertisement
Brigitte Macron’s Tax Records Hacked Amid Online Gender Conspiracy

Brigitte Macron’s Tax Records Hacked Amid Online Gender Conspiracy

French First Lady Brigitte Macron's tax account was illicitly altered to add a male name, inflaming gender conspiracy theories which have led to a defamation lawsuit.

In a striking breach of privacy, Brigitte Macron, France's First Lady, has been the victim of a hacking incident where her personal tax records were manipulated. Her chief of staff, Tristan Bromet, informed BFMTV that her tax account was altered to display “Jean-Michel, known as Brigitte Macron.” This cyber intrusion not only compromises personal data but also fuels the existing gender-based conspiracy theories surrounding Mrs. Macron.

The incident came to light when the First Lady, aged 72, found unauthorized changes to her legal name within her tax account, prompting her to file a formal complaint with the authorities. Investigators have since identified two individuals connected to the hack.

This unsettling event coincides with the beginning of a criminal trial in Paris, where ten individuals face charges of sexist cyber-harassment against Mrs. Macron. The defendants, a group consisting of eight men and two women between the ages of 41 and 60, could receive up to two years in prison if convicted of making numerous derogatory comments about the First Lady's gender and sexuality on various online platforms.

For years, claims regarding Mrs. Macron's gender have circulated widely on the internet, with unfounded assertions that her real name is Jean-Michel Trogneux. This name, however, belongs to Mrs. Macron's older brother, pointing to the erroneous nature of these claims. The conspiracy theory gained considerable attention after French bloggers Amandine Roy and Natacha Rey broadcasted it in a YouTube video in 2021, resulting in international dissemination of the false allegations.

In response to these persistent and unsubstantiated claims, French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife have taken legal action against those they believe are spreading defamatory information. One high-profile case involves American influencer Candace Owens, who has propagated the allegations to her extensive social media audience.

In March 2024, Owens staked her entire professional reputation on the theory that Mrs. Macron was born Jean-Michel Trogneux and transitioned at age 30. The Macrons filed a defamation lawsuit against Owens in Delaware, seeking both compensatory and punitive damages, with the details of the amount unspecified in the 218-page lawsuit filed on July 23.

The French couple has accused Owens of conducting a "campaign of global humiliation" and "relentless bullying," aiming to cause them distress while boosting her own notoriety. Despite the Macrons offering Owens multiple opportunities to retract her statements, she has persisted in her claims, leading the couple to seek judicial intervention as their last resort for redress.

In a peculiar twist, Owens has claimed that Brigitte Macron was originally female but died and on her deathbed transferred her identity to her brother, Jean-Michel Trogneux. Owens has asserted this narrative based on what she terms a "thorough investigation" by blogger Natacha Rey, even after the Macrons' legal counsel demanded a retraction.

The Macrons' legal pursuits have seen both success and setbacks, with a previous defamation win against bloggers Roy and Rey being overturned on appeal on the grounds of freedom of expression. The Macrons are currently appealing this decision, hopeful that their lawsuit against Owens will put an end to the defamation and restore their reputations.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

From a progressive perspective, the hacking of Brigitte Macron's tax records and the subsequent spread of gender conspiracy theories represent a serious breach of privacy and a form of gender-based harassment. It is a stark reminder of the systemic issues that allow for such targeted attacks against individuals, particularly women in the public eye.

The response by the Macrons, including the filing of a defamation lawsuit against Candace Owens, is indicative of the need for systemic solutions to protect individuals from character assassination and online harassment. The spread of misinformation and its impact on individuals' well-being and reputations raises questions about the responsibilities of influencers and the platforms they use.

The progressive ethos emphasizes the collective responsibility to foster an environment of respect and equity, where personal attacks based on gender and identity are not tolerated. The Macrons' legal challenges highlight the need for greater accountability in the digital space, ensuring that freedom of expression does not come at the cost of another's dignity and mental health.

Conservative View

From a conservative standpoint, the hacking incident involving France's First Lady Brigitte Macron’s tax records is an egregious violation of privacy and an affront to personal dignity. The act of altering her legal name to propagate an unfounded gender conspiracy theory is not only a criminal offense but also a malicious attack on an individual's identity. It is paramount that personal responsibility is upheld, and those behind such actions are held accountable.

The legal actions taken by the Macrons, particularly against American influencer Candace Owens, underscore the importance of respecting individuals' rights and protecting reputations from unsubstantiated claims. It is crucial that the legal system works efficiently to address these defamations, as they can have lasting negative impacts on individuals and their families.

The pursuit of truth and the protection of individual liberty demand that these conspiracy theories are not left unchallenged. The Macrons' determination to counter the falsehoods through the courts is a rightful exercise of their legal recourse. Moreover, the importance of maintaining a free but responsible and respectful discourse is a principle that aligns with traditional conservative values.

Common Ground

In the midst of polarized views, there is common ground to be found in the case of Brigitte Macron's tax record hacking. Both conservative and progressive sides can agree on the fundamental right to privacy and the condemnation of illegal and unethical breaches of personal information.

The shared value of respect for individual dignity transcends political divides, uniting both perspectives in the pursuit of justice for those wronged by such acts. The bipartisan support for legal recourse in defamation cases demonstrates a collective commitment to protecting reputations and upholding the truth.

Furthermore, there is a mutual understanding of the harm caused by spreading baseless conspiracy theories. Acknowledging the personal toll these attacks can take, there is a common call for responsible discourse and the need to challenge falsehoods that damage individuals and the fabric of society. The case of the Macrons serves as a catalyst for a broader dialogue on the balance between freedom of speech and the prevention of defamation and harassment.