Sponsor Advertisement
Utah Family Wins Historic $951 Million in Medical Malpractice Case

Utah Family Wins Historic $951 Million in Medical Malpractice Case

A Utah family was awarded $951 million for medical malpractice after a hospital's negligent care during childbirth caused severe brain damage to their daughter. The case against Jordan Valley Medical Center West Valley Campus is one of the largest malpractice awards in history.

In a landmark decision, a Utah family has been awarded one of the largest medical malpractice settlements in history. Third District Judge Patrick Corum ordered Jordan Valley Medical Center West Valley Campus to pay $951 million in damages for providing substandard care during the birth of Anyssa Zancanella's daughter in October 2019, which resulted in the child's permanent brain damage.

The incident occurred when Zancanella, who was visiting the Salt Lake City area from Wyoming, went into labor and sought emergency care at Jordan Valley Medical Center, operated by the now-defunct Steward Health Care system. The lawsuit detailed a series of critical missteps by the medical staff, including the administration of excessive doses of Pitocin, a labor-inducing drug, and a significant delay in performing a cesarean section, which led to the newborn, Azaylee, suffering from oxygen deprivation.

During the trial, it was revealed that the nurses assigned to Zancanella were inexperienced with laboring patients, with court documents noting that for at least one of the nurses, it was their first time managing a laboring patient. The attending obstetrician was also accused of abandoning the mother and child during a critical time in the labor process.

As a result of the prolonged and mismanaged labor, Azaylee was born with severe neurological and cognitive damage, requiring constant care. She experiences frequent seizures and is unable to speak or function independently. The family's life has been drastically altered, with Zancanella stating in her testimony that her daughter is "trapped" inside her condition, profoundly affecting the entire family.

Judge Corum's scathing assessment of the hospital's performance included a remark that Zancanella "would have been better off delivering this baby at the bathroom of a gas station, or in a hut somewhere in Africa, than in this hospital." He went on to describe the medical center as "the most dangerous place on the planet" for Zancanella to give birth.

The damages awarded include compensation for the lifelong care that Azaylee will require and punitive damages against the medical center. However, the collection of the award remains uncertain due to Steward Health Care's withdrawal from the case and its subsequent filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in 2024. Despite these complications, the family's attorney, Jennifer Morales, remains confident that they will recover at least half of the awarded sum.

Judge Corum's ruling not only reflects the gravity of the medical negligence but also the profound loss experienced by the family. "The person she was to be, the person she deserved to be, is trapped inside a brain-damaged child," he stated, emphasizing the irreversible harm inflicted upon Azaylee.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The heart-wrenching story of the Zancanella family's loss due to medical malpractice is a stark reminder of the systemic issues plaguing our healthcare system. Progressives see this case as evidence of the need for comprehensive healthcare reform, including stricter regulations and oversight to protect patients from negligent care.

The size of the settlement speaks to the severity of the damage inflicted upon Azaylee and her family, reflecting a society that values human life and the pursuit of justice. Progressives would argue that such a settlement, while it can never truly compensate for the loss suffered, is necessary to support the lifelong care that Azaylee will require and to deter future negligence by healthcare providers.

The fact that Steward Health Care could file for bankruptcy and potentially evade full responsibility for its actions is troubling. This case illustrates the need for stronger legal mechanisms to ensure that corporations cannot escape accountability through financial maneuvers. Progressives would advocate for legal reforms to protect victims' rights and ensure that justice is served, even when corporations face financial difficulties.

Conservative View

The tragic case of Anyssa Zancanella and her daughter Azaylee highlights a catastrophic failure in a healthcare system that conservatives believe should be held to the highest standards of accountability. This incident underscores the need for rigorous oversight and the enforcement of medical protocols to ensure that such negligence does not occur. The substantial award in this case sends a clear message that institutions must prioritize patient care over profit and that there are severe consequences for failing to do so.

From a conservative standpoint, while the award amount is staggering, it is a just response to the egregious harm caused by the hospital's negligence. It is a reminder that the justice system must uphold the rights of individuals and families against the potential malpractices of larger entities. Furthermore, it emphasizes the importance of personal responsibility among medical professionals, who should be properly trained and prepared to handle the critical responsibilities entrusted to them.

The bankruptcy of Steward Health Care raises concerns about the financial management and ethical considerations within the healthcare industry. This case may serve as a cautionary tale for other healthcare providers, reinforcing the conservative belief in the necessity of sound business practices and ethical conduct within the medical profession.

Common Ground

Both conservative and progressive viewpoints can agree on the fundamental principle that the healthcare system must prioritize patient safety and adhere to the highest standards of care. The Zancanella case is a tragic example of what can happen when these standards are not met. Both sides may also concur that the justice system should hold medical institutions accountable for their actions and that victims of medical malpractice deserve fair compensation to support their recovery and ongoing care needs.